Mike Cameron from ATV News had a story on this newspaper in this evening news. I guess they showed a real picture of a mother Breast feeding her baby. The Irvings ordered the newspapers off the street. What do you think of the HERE newspaper? I'm just curious...
8 comments:
Piece of crap not worth wrapping a fish in. It's free and I still want a refund.
I dont see any boobies
I wouldn't be surprised if a few local businesses didn't want the old cover. I bet there would have been parenting/women's groups that would have taken them though.
All in all, here does suck
Is that story true? Who is the editor? Obviously an editor made that decision and then Irving's overrode them. THat's something most editors claimed never happened when they presented in front of the senate committee. Is there any way to make lies told to committees perjury?
here used to be a good mag.......of course, that was before it was bought by Irvings.
And get a load of this: the editor gave 2 weeks notice on Monday but when she went inot work on Thursday, she was locked out of her computer and escorted of the premises. And I find this too funny: the new editor was their distrubition manager!
I have that issue of here, and there's no such photos.
How dare they remove breasts from a magazine? When I am Premier with my majority government after the next election I'll make sure women's bresats are available everywhere for all to see. Oh, now I need a cold shower.
8:01
There definitly was the picture on the front. It was distributed to some locations, not all locations, and then took them back and replaced them with the ones with the new picture on Friday.
Post a Comment