WHERE WILL BERNARD LORD BE LOCATED IN THE MORNING????

Does anyone knows?????

IS BERNARD LORD HOLDING OUR CHILDREN HOSTAGE????

IRVING ROGERS TELEVISION TRYING TO HELP BERNARD LORD TONIGHT!!!!

People from Ontario are trying to help Bernard Lord by denying the public to call in the show!!!!! They have no one from the NDP!!!! They're trying hard to brainwash the public!!!!





No wonder Irving Rogers television only buy their gas from the Irvings!!!

DID I SEE BERNARD LORD CRYING AGAIN????

He did this kind of action twice in the past. He told me the media with a sad expression on his face that he didn't have a clue the conditions the families live in Saint John!!! I say - BULL SH#T!!!!!

IVAN COURT COULDN'T SPEAK IN A SUPPOSE FREE DEMOCRACY????

I received this email.

I wanted to understand how things went down with the the LNG Deal.



I recall this clearly: Before the Mayor asked them to vote that night; the mayor met with some Councillors individually and informed some more then others.

Hooton said she was asked by the Mayor to not discuss anything after her private meeting.



Ivan Court was not informed about an early meeting to be at Council and a meeting went on without him. When he arrived he was told shortly before council was going to commence, no time to get more information.

A vote was made and all had been decided before so the Deal was passed.

Most asked their questions but the group as a whole wanted the Deal.

Next council meeting Hooton passed a motion to rescind and Hooton was allowed to give her rescinding speech.



Court wanted to rescind but because Hooton was given the opportunity by the Mayor to pass her motion, Court could not ask or speak on the item. Had Councillor Court been able to rescind we would have at least had a chance revisited the tax deal.

Also he would have brought out more facts.

It was known from the start they had to keep Councillor Court out of the loop.

Finally next Council meeting, Councillor Court brought forward a motion and asked if someone would second his motion to revisit the tax deal and no one would second his motion; Court wanted to obtain information on the dangers and also more information for a better tax deal; wanting what was right for the people of Saint John.

Other areas were automatically given millions under similar deals. Hooton was not there and therefore did not have to second Courts motion; convenient or what!

On CFBC she said she voted against the Deal everytime. But all along she said she was only against the process," this was flawed" she quoted.



Never once did she ever defend on the fact that this was not a fair tax deal or did she ever try to help Councillor Court revisit the deal.

While she has been acting like she was representing us in reality she was not representing the taxpayers just her corporate friends whom she met with and a plan was staged and the rest is history or Hooton's version of history.

PS Oh yes Hooton had time for a "move on speech " but at no time did she ever want to try to help the taxpayers of Saint John who were only asking to get fair municipal tax dollars in an area that has been in need for far too long.

TIM SMITH WANTS A BULLHORN!!!!

I guess he wants one for the weekend? Do you have one? Give him a call at 693-9464 or email him at thsmith@nb.sympatico.ca

BERNARD LORD ON NOVEMBER 15TH!!!!! < THINK ABOUT IT!!!! >

BERNARD LORD ACT OF DESPERATION TO THE VOTERS OF SAINT JOHN HARBOUR!!!!!

TIM SMITH WILL BLOG WHAT IS SAID ON THE TALK SHOW!!

Tim did a good job. So???? Did you listen to the talk show this morning? Is Bernard Lord still the King?

PLEASE ANSWER THIS QUESTION????

I bumped into Andy Scott a few weeks ago and I noticed he was wearing a new pair of glasses. I politely told the MP that he should get rid of his new glasses…lol…< all in fun.>

But a few days ago, he still had them on. He don’t listen to good!...lol….So what do you think? Stay with the new or go back to the old? I say - Go back!!!

The old???



The new???



Let me know....lol