Even when I wasn't ban from the Legislature. I never even tried to get an invitation.
I just couldn't stay still in the gallery. It would be an impossible task!!!
My uncle enjoyed it I guess?
Tuesday, February 06, 2007
SHAWN GRAHAM TO DELIVER THE SPEECH FROM THE THRONE IN ONE HOUR!!!!
This is what I like about the new Premier. He gave me this photo-op without any problem.
It’s call good public relation. Do you believe I could have gotten the same picture with Bernard Lord?
Of course not!!!!!
I might add that before he left? I said- I hope there’s something about Ritalin in there???
I just couldn’t stop myself!!!!
I went at the Legislature and it’s quiet!!! Ok...gotts go...
Stay tuned!!!!!
Ok...I'm off to the New Brunswick Legislature!!!!!!
I believe that I will be arrested but if there's a protest? I have to cover the story. The Irvings sure won't!!!!
If I'm jailed? This means that New Brunswickers will find out the reasons that I was banned in the first place.
The names of the cowards will come to light. I know of one name but I will not print the name until we find out what's going on?
Stay tuned!!!!
If I'm jailed? This means that New Brunswickers will find out the reasons that I was banned in the first place.
The names of the cowards will come to light. I know of one name but I will not print the name until we find out what's going on?
Stay tuned!!!!
Brent Taylor - KOOK INTERVIEWS BIGOT!!!!
.Ok......Here it is!!! The first audio interview for this blogger.
The guy edited the chat. I like the old version better because it was funny at times.
But that’s my opinion.
It was funny. Maybe once we get things going? We could play the whole interview?
Anyway, this could be a new version of blogging for this guy.
I always walk around with my recorder on me so you never know who I will have a chat with?
Click below for the first interview and let me know what you think about it?
target="_blank">Charles
Blog
The guy edited the chat. I like the old version better because it was funny at times.
But that’s my opinion.
It was funny. Maybe once we get things going? We could play the whole interview?
Anyway, this could be a new version of blogging for this guy.
I always walk around with my recorder on me so you never know who I will have a chat with?
Click below for the first interview and let me know what you think about it?
target="_blank">Charles
Blog
God's Minute!!!
AND DO NOT LEAD US INTO TEMPTATION, BUT DELIVER
US FROM THE EVIL ONE. FOR YOURS IS THE KINGDOM
AND THE POWER AND THE GLORY FOREVER. AMEN.
( MATTHEW 6:13 *NKJV )
Dear Charles,
We all face temptations in this life at times so; BE
SOBER, BE VIGILANT; BECAUSE YOUR ADVERSARY
THE DEVIL WALKS ABOUT LIKE A ROARING LION,
SEEKING WHOM HE MAY DEVOUR. ( 1 PETER 5:8 )
After all satan knows that; EACH ONE IS TEMPTED
WHEN HE IS DRAWN AWAY BY HIS OWN DESIRES
AND ENTICED. ( JAMES 1:14 ) and that is one of his
favorite tricks!
Therefore; MY SON, IF SINNERS ENTICE YOU, DO
NOT CONSENT. ( PROVERBS 1:10 ) Instead; WATCH
AND PRAY, LEST YOU ENTER INTO TEMPTATION.
THE SPIRIT INDEED IS WILLING, BUT THE FLESH IS
WEAK. ( MARK 14:38 )
Also remember that; NO TEMPTATION HAS OVER-
TAKEN YOU EXCEPT SUCH IS COMMON TO MAN; BUT
GOD IS FAITHFUL, WHO WILL NOT ALLOW YOU TO BE
TEMPTED BEYOND WHAT YOU ARE ABLE, BUT WITH
THE TEMPTATION WILL ALSO MAKE THE WAY OF
ESCAPE, THAT YOU MAY BE ABLE TO BEAR IT.
( 1 CORINTHIANS 10:13 )
So Charles, the next time you are tempted do not give in,
instead; SUBMIT TO GOD. RESIST THE DEVIL AND HE
WILL FLEE FROM YOU. ( JAMES 4:7 )
NOW TO HIM WHO IS ABLE TO KEEP YOU FROM
STUMBLING, AND TO PRESENT YOU FAULTLESS
BEFORE THE PRESENCE OF HIS GLORY WITH
EXCEEDING JOY, TO GOD OUR SAVIOR, WHO ALONE
IS WISE, BE GLORY AND MAJESTY, DOMINION AND
POWER, BOTH NOW AND FOREVER. AMEN
( JUDE 24-25 )
With My Love & Prayers,
your servant Allen
[ Prayer Requests---Contact Us---Bible Study---*Donations* ]
[ Audio---Subscribe---Change of Address---Unsubscribe ]
at: http://www.godsminute.org
Apostle Paul Ministries, P O Box 55996, Hayward, CA 94545
(c) Copyright 2007 by Apostle Paul Ministries
This Daily Message was sent by request to:
Charles Leblanc at
QUEBEC DID IT RIGHT!!! WHY NOT THE SAME ACTION IN SAINT JOHN????
Natural-gas proposal sparks fears
Quebec citizens concerned that terminal would pose serious dangers to community
RHÉAL SÉGUIN
From Monday's Globe and Mail
QUEBEC — A poll conducted by the citizens coalition last fall showed that 75 per cent of households living within a 2.5-kilometre radius of the future site are against the project.
Concerns over Rabaska have grown to the point where, when public hearings resumed last Monday, the joint federal-provincial environmental-assessment panel that will decide whether to go ahead with the LNG terminal had received more than 625 briefs from various groups, experts and individuals -- the most the panel has received for any project in Quebec.
The $840-million project was developed by a consortium of Gaz Métro LP, Quebec's leading natural gas distributor, Ontario-based Enbridge Inc. and the French energy company Gaz de France.
The original plan was to build the project in the small community of Beaumont on the south shore of the St. Lawrence River across from Quebec City. But Mr. St-Laurent and other residents mounted a successful campaign to stop it. In a referendum held in December, 2004, 70 per cent of voters gave a resounding No.
The consortium has signed an agreement with Lévis city council to pay an average of $10-million a year in property taxes over 50 years, making Rabaska one of the highest-tax-paying industrial facilities in the province.
Rabaska promised to offset the loss of any property value for all 135 homeowners within a 1.5-kilometre radius of the terminal. And the company said it would pay the cost of any home-insurance premium increase caused by the terminal.
In addition, Rabaska vowed to invest $300,000 in the city's public transportation system and $475,000 for a new park and recreational area, and to plant as many as 15,000 trees around the facility to attenuate its visual impact.
Construction of the terminal, which will last more than three years, will create more than 500 jobs in general, and as many as 800 during peak construction periods. Afterward, the company estimates it will hire 70 full-time employees and contends the project will generate another 220 jobs with local suppliers.
There are currently five LNG import facilities in North America, all in the United States. Government regulators have approved close to 20 more, including three in Canada. Another 25 are waiting for approval, of which five, including Rabaska, are in Canada.
The environmental panel must table its report April 4. Should it recommend approval, local residents plan to take court action, arguing that the building of the LNG terminal violates municipal zoning bylaws as well the province's agricultural land-protection laws.
"It's going to take one hell of a government decree to override existing laws," Mr. St-Laurent said. "I wish them good luck because we'll be waiting for them."
Read a past blog by clicking below -
target="_blank">Charles
Blog
Quebec citizens concerned that terminal would pose serious dangers to community
RHÉAL SÉGUIN
From Monday's Globe and Mail
QUEBEC — A poll conducted by the citizens coalition last fall showed that 75 per cent of households living within a 2.5-kilometre radius of the future site are against the project.
Concerns over Rabaska have grown to the point where, when public hearings resumed last Monday, the joint federal-provincial environmental-assessment panel that will decide whether to go ahead with the LNG terminal had received more than 625 briefs from various groups, experts and individuals -- the most the panel has received for any project in Quebec.
The $840-million project was developed by a consortium of Gaz Métro LP, Quebec's leading natural gas distributor, Ontario-based Enbridge Inc. and the French energy company Gaz de France.
The original plan was to build the project in the small community of Beaumont on the south shore of the St. Lawrence River across from Quebec City. But Mr. St-Laurent and other residents mounted a successful campaign to stop it. In a referendum held in December, 2004, 70 per cent of voters gave a resounding No.
The consortium has signed an agreement with Lévis city council to pay an average of $10-million a year in property taxes over 50 years, making Rabaska one of the highest-tax-paying industrial facilities in the province.
Rabaska promised to offset the loss of any property value for all 135 homeowners within a 1.5-kilometre radius of the terminal. And the company said it would pay the cost of any home-insurance premium increase caused by the terminal.
In addition, Rabaska vowed to invest $300,000 in the city's public transportation system and $475,000 for a new park and recreational area, and to plant as many as 15,000 trees around the facility to attenuate its visual impact.
Construction of the terminal, which will last more than three years, will create more than 500 jobs in general, and as many as 800 during peak construction periods. Afterward, the company estimates it will hire 70 full-time employees and contends the project will generate another 220 jobs with local suppliers.
There are currently five LNG import facilities in North America, all in the United States. Government regulators have approved close to 20 more, including three in Canada. Another 25 are waiting for approval, of which five, including Rabaska, are in Canada.
The environmental panel must table its report April 4. Should it recommend approval, local residents plan to take court action, arguing that the building of the LNG terminal violates municipal zoning bylaws as well the province's agricultural land-protection laws.
"It's going to take one hell of a government decree to override existing laws," Mr. St-Laurent said. "I wish them good luck because we'll be waiting for them."
Read a past blog by clicking below -
target="_blank">Charles
Blog
Will the drugging and the killing of our children in New brunswick continue with Shawn Graham???
Here's an email I just received...Click read more...
Just aired last week, you can now watch the shocking BBC documentary Secrets of the Drug Trials on the association between Paxil and suicide here:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/panorama/6291773.stm
Although it focuses on children and Paxil, there is really no clinical difference between any of the SSRI antidepressants and children or adults with regards to suicide and self harm.
This case is but an example, encapsulating the professional/institutional
betrayal of trust by big pharma, gov't regulators and doctors/researchers, and the triumph of marketing over science.
What this documentary exposes is the corrupting influence in pharmaceutical science which has become almost natural and easy -- the product not only of greed and self-interest, but of established professional and organisational practice.
As one of the mother's (who lost a child to suicide while on Paxil) interviewed in the documentary put it, "it's despicable".
-a
--------
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/panorama/6291773.stm
Drug company 'hid' suicide link
Secret emails reveal that the UK's biggest drug company distorted trial results of an anti-depressant, covering up a link with suicide in teenagers.
Panorama reveals that GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) attempted to show that Seroxat (Paxil) worked for depressed children despite failed clinical trials.
And that GSK-employed ghostwriters influenced 'independent' academics.
GSK told Panorama: "GSK utterly rejects any suggestion that it has improperly withheld drug trial information."
GSK faces action in the US where bereaved families have joined together to sue the company.
As a result, GSK has been forced to open its confidential internal archive.
Karen Barth Menzies is a partner in one of the firms representing many of the families.
She has examined thousands of the documents which are stored, box upon box, in an apartment in Malibu, California.
She said: "Even when they have negative studies that show that this drug Seroxat is going to harm some kids they still spin that study as remarkably effective and safe for children."
GSK's biggest clinical trial of Seroxat (Paxil) on children was held in the US in the 1990s and called Study 329.
Child psychiatrist Dr Neal Ryan of the University of Pittsburgh was paid by GSK as a co-author of Study 329.
In 2002 he also gave a talk on childhood depression at a medical conference sponsored by GSK.
He said that Seroxat (Paxil) could be a suitable treatment for children and later told Panorama reporter Shelley Jofre that it probably lowered rather than raised suicide rates.
In amongst the archive of emails in Malibu, Shelley was surprised to find that her own emails to Dr Ryan from 2002 asking questions about the safety of Seroxat (Paxil) had been forwarded to GSK asking for advice on how to respond to her.
She also found an email from a public relations executive working for GSK which said: "Originally we had planned to do extensive media relations surrounding this study until we actually viewed the results.
"Essentially the study did not really show it was effective in treating adolescent depression, which is not something we want to publicise."
But the article was published in the Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry which says it ranks as number one in child mental health in the world.
The editor in chief of the British Medical Journal, Fiona Godlee, said that what she calls the "blind-eye culture of medicine" should be exposed by professionals.
She has written in response to the Panorama film: "We shouldn't have to rely on investigative journalists to ask the difficult questions.
"Reputations for sale are reputations at risk. We need to make that risk so high it's not worth taking."
The Medicine and Healthcare Products Regulatory Authority (MHRA) began a criminal investigation into GSK three years ago but no action has been taken yet.
A spokesperson told Panorama that the investigation has been given substantial additional resources and remains a high priority.
Seroxat (Paxil) was banned for under 18s in 2003 after the MHRA, revealed that GSK's own studies showed the drug actually trebles the risk of suicidal thoughts and behaviour in depressed children.
WILL QUEBEC SECURITY STAFF LET OLDER NEW BRUNSWICKERS FREEZE TO DEATH???
It's going to be close minus 40 with wind chill.
For the first time in New Brunswick history? The citizens will be search at the door.
I'll see if I can take a couple of pictures.
Hey? The Quebec Security Staff might run out and jump me or send the Fredericton Police Force after moi?
Quebecers searching New Brunswickers????
Only in New Brunswick!!!! Give me a break!!!
Click below for a past blog on this issue
target="_blank">Charles
Blog
For the first time in New Brunswick history? The citizens will be search at the door.
I'll see if I can take a couple of pictures.
Hey? The Quebec Security Staff might run out and jump me or send the Fredericton Police Force after moi?
Quebecers searching New Brunswickers????
Only in New Brunswick!!!! Give me a break!!!
Click below for a past blog on this issue
target="_blank">Charles
Blog
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)