Andrew Crystal < no picture >
Tuesday, November 29, 2005
ADHD OR RITALIN IS A FRAUD!!!!!
Home > Your Children Are Mentally Ill!
Is your child easily distracted? Or perhaps he talks excessively, or can become impatient? Most, if not all, parents would perhaps answer yes to these questions, as they are, what many of us believe to be, normal expressions of child behaviour. Not so, according to Psychiatry. It could be that your child has "Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder", a "disease" of the mind that could require medical treatment.
(I-Newswire) - The American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistics Manual ( DSM, version IV ), the psychiatrist's handbook, lists a number of behavioural traits, such as these, that it considers abnormal in children. Others include: "often has difficulty awaiting turn", "often does not seem to listen when spoken to directly", and "often has difficulty playing or engaging in leisure activities quietly".
'It's total fraud', says Michael Westen, editor of Psychbusters ( groups.msn.com/psychbusters ), an online activist group that was set up in 2000 to 'decode Psychiatric propaganda'. 'This is not a disease and these are not "diagnostic criteria." These are subjective judgments aimed at coercing a person to follow rules of "proper conduct" made by others with power. The list could just as easily contain: fails to be white, often does not attend a Christian church, tends to be smaller, younger, and unable to do adult tasks.'
'For a disease to exist there must be a tangible, objective physical abnormality that can be determined by a test,' says neurologist Dr. Fred Baughman. 'Such as, but not limited to, a blood or urine test, X-Ray, brain scan or biopsy. All reputable doctors would agree: No physical abnormality, no disease. In psychiatry, no test or brain scan exists to prove that a 'mental disorder' is a physical disease.'
Baughman, from California, and Fellow of the American Academy of Neurology, is one of an ever-growing number of campaigners fighting to expose the lies within the psychiatric industry. An adult & child neurologist of some 35 years, Dr. Baughman is vocal when coming up against misleading research or downright fraud palmed off as "science". 'They made a list of the most common symptoms of emotional discomfiture of children, those which bother teachers and parents most, and in a stroke that could not be more devoid of science or Hippocratic motive--termed them a "disease". Twenty five years of research, not deserving of the term "research", has failed to validate ADD/ADHD as a disease. Tragically--the "epidemic" having grown from 500 thousand in 1985 to between 5 and 7 million today--this remains the state of the "science" of ADHD.'
Despite there being no scientific basis for ADHD, prescriptions of Methylphenidate - most commonly sold as Ritalin - rose to 359,100 last year, a rise of 344,400 since 1995. Figures from the Prescriptions Pricing Authority reveal that there has been a 180-fold increase in prescriptions since 1991 when only 2,000 were issued in England.
Ritalin, which is pharmacologically similar to Cocaine, is a favoured treatment option for those labelled with ADHD, yet critics claim it is a harmful drug that can cause neurological defects and further behavioural difficulties. Earlier this year, researchers in Texas found a link between Ritalin use and chromosome abnormalities - occurrences associated with increased risks of cancer and other adverse health effects.
'The simple fact is that there is absolutely no reliable test that accurately distinguishes between children that are supposed to have "ADHD" and those that are not', says Dr. John Breeding, author of "The Wildest Colts Make The Best Horses". To counter the claim that ADHD is a valid medical condition that requires medical treatment, Breeding encourages parents to demand conclusive scientific evidence. For there simply isn't any.
Elliot S. Valenstien, Ph.D., Professor Emeritus of Psychology and Neuroscience at the University of Michigan also agrees. 'Contrary to what is often claimed, no biochemical, anatomical, or functional signs have been found that reliably distinguish the brains of mental patients.'
'I am constantly amazed by how many patients who come to see me believe or want to believe that their difficulties are biologic and can be relieved by a pill,' says psychiatrist Dr. David Kaiser. 'This is despite the fact that modern psychiatry has yet to convincingly prove the genetic/biologic cause of any single mental illness. However, this does not stop psychiatry from making essentially unproven claims that depression, bipolar illness, anxiety disorders, alcoholism and a host of other disorders are in fact primarily biologic and probably genetic in origin, and that it is only a matter of time until all this is proven. This kind of faith in science and progress is staggering, not to mention naive and perhaps delusional.'
But if ADHD does not exist as a disease, what explains the inattentiveness and hyperactivity in so many of our children?
'There are people out there who believe that those who question the existence of ADHD must question the existence of hyperactivity or attention difficulties, but that's totally untrue,' says Michael Westen. 'There are many reasons why a child can become inattentive or hyperactive. Nutritional deficiencies or a poor diet are often underlying problems. There can be difficulties in the home, disciplinary issues, vision problems, even a lack of sleep. And there can be many others. Yet instead of looking at all these issues Psychiatry ignores them, inventing a one-size-fits-all "disease" that requires "medication". It's junkscience.'
'The lives of millions of children are being put at risk,' says Lawrence Smith, creator of www.RitalinDeath.com, 'with dangerous, addictive drugs that have been publicly known to cause death, suicide, cardio vascular damage, chemical dependency, depression, tics, weight loss, appetite loss, school shootings and many other things for something that can't even be proven.' Smith, from Michigan, lost his fourteen year old son Matthew to long-term Ritalin use, in 2000. According to Dr. Ljuba Dragovic, the Chief Pathologist of Oakland County, upon autopsy, Matthew's heart showed clear signs of small vessel damage caused from the use of Ritalin. Matthew had had no pre-existing heart condition or defect.
'Disingenuous comparisons between physical and mental illness and medicine are simply part of psychiatry's orchestrated but fraudulent public relations and marketing campaign,' says Dr. Baughman.
Many seem to share these views including the late Dr. Loren Mosher, a noted psychiatrist and clinical professor of Psychiatry at the University of California, San Diego, and former Chief of the Center for Studies of Schizophrenia at the National Institute of Mental Health. Mosher famously resigned from the American Psychiatric Association in 1998 due to Psychiatry's growing "unholy alliance" with the multi-billion dollar pharmaceutical industry.
'Psychiatry has become drug dependent ( that is, devoted to pill pushing ) at all levels - private practitioners, public system psychiatrists, university faculty and organizationally,' Mosher wrote before attacking the field as being mechanistic, reductionistic, tunnel-visioned and dehumanising.
Between the years of 1990-2000, over 569 children were hospitalized in the USA due to the effects of ADHD medication, according to the FDA MedWatch program. 186 deaths were also reported, yet critics point out that MedWatch is a voluntary reporting scheme and that these numbers represent no more than 10 to 20% of the actual incidence.
'Modern psychiatry has forgotten the Hippocratic principle,' Mosher once wrote. 'Above all, do no harm.'
###
PSYCHBUSTERS
Decoding Psychiatric Propaganda
http://groups.msn.com/psychbusters
Is your child easily distracted? Or perhaps he talks excessively, or can become impatient? Most, if not all, parents would perhaps answer yes to these questions, as they are, what many of us believe to be, normal expressions of child behaviour. Not so, according to Psychiatry. It could be that your child has "Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder", a "disease" of the mind that could require medical treatment.
(I-Newswire) - The American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistics Manual ( DSM, version IV ), the psychiatrist's handbook, lists a number of behavioural traits, such as these, that it considers abnormal in children. Others include: "often has difficulty awaiting turn", "often does not seem to listen when spoken to directly", and "often has difficulty playing or engaging in leisure activities quietly".
'It's total fraud', says Michael Westen, editor of Psychbusters ( groups.msn.com/psychbusters ), an online activist group that was set up in 2000 to 'decode Psychiatric propaganda'. 'This is not a disease and these are not "diagnostic criteria." These are subjective judgments aimed at coercing a person to follow rules of "proper conduct" made by others with power. The list could just as easily contain: fails to be white, often does not attend a Christian church, tends to be smaller, younger, and unable to do adult tasks.'
'For a disease to exist there must be a tangible, objective physical abnormality that can be determined by a test,' says neurologist Dr. Fred Baughman. 'Such as, but not limited to, a blood or urine test, X-Ray, brain scan or biopsy. All reputable doctors would agree: No physical abnormality, no disease. In psychiatry, no test or brain scan exists to prove that a 'mental disorder' is a physical disease.'
Baughman, from California, and Fellow of the American Academy of Neurology, is one of an ever-growing number of campaigners fighting to expose the lies within the psychiatric industry. An adult & child neurologist of some 35 years, Dr. Baughman is vocal when coming up against misleading research or downright fraud palmed off as "science". 'They made a list of the most common symptoms of emotional discomfiture of children, those which bother teachers and parents most, and in a stroke that could not be more devoid of science or Hippocratic motive--termed them a "disease". Twenty five years of research, not deserving of the term "research", has failed to validate ADD/ADHD as a disease. Tragically--the "epidemic" having grown from 500 thousand in 1985 to between 5 and 7 million today--this remains the state of the "science" of ADHD.'
Despite there being no scientific basis for ADHD, prescriptions of Methylphenidate - most commonly sold as Ritalin - rose to 359,100 last year, a rise of 344,400 since 1995. Figures from the Prescriptions Pricing Authority reveal that there has been a 180-fold increase in prescriptions since 1991 when only 2,000 were issued in England.
Ritalin, which is pharmacologically similar to Cocaine, is a favoured treatment option for those labelled with ADHD, yet critics claim it is a harmful drug that can cause neurological defects and further behavioural difficulties. Earlier this year, researchers in Texas found a link between Ritalin use and chromosome abnormalities - occurrences associated with increased risks of cancer and other adverse health effects.
'The simple fact is that there is absolutely no reliable test that accurately distinguishes between children that are supposed to have "ADHD" and those that are not', says Dr. John Breeding, author of "The Wildest Colts Make The Best Horses". To counter the claim that ADHD is a valid medical condition that requires medical treatment, Breeding encourages parents to demand conclusive scientific evidence. For there simply isn't any.
Elliot S. Valenstien, Ph.D., Professor Emeritus of Psychology and Neuroscience at the University of Michigan also agrees. 'Contrary to what is often claimed, no biochemical, anatomical, or functional signs have been found that reliably distinguish the brains of mental patients.'
'I am constantly amazed by how many patients who come to see me believe or want to believe that their difficulties are biologic and can be relieved by a pill,' says psychiatrist Dr. David Kaiser. 'This is despite the fact that modern psychiatry has yet to convincingly prove the genetic/biologic cause of any single mental illness. However, this does not stop psychiatry from making essentially unproven claims that depression, bipolar illness, anxiety disorders, alcoholism and a host of other disorders are in fact primarily biologic and probably genetic in origin, and that it is only a matter of time until all this is proven. This kind of faith in science and progress is staggering, not to mention naive and perhaps delusional.'
But if ADHD does not exist as a disease, what explains the inattentiveness and hyperactivity in so many of our children?
'There are people out there who believe that those who question the existence of ADHD must question the existence of hyperactivity or attention difficulties, but that's totally untrue,' says Michael Westen. 'There are many reasons why a child can become inattentive or hyperactive. Nutritional deficiencies or a poor diet are often underlying problems. There can be difficulties in the home, disciplinary issues, vision problems, even a lack of sleep. And there can be many others. Yet instead of looking at all these issues Psychiatry ignores them, inventing a one-size-fits-all "disease" that requires "medication". It's junkscience.'
'The lives of millions of children are being put at risk,' says Lawrence Smith, creator of www.RitalinDeath.com, 'with dangerous, addictive drugs that have been publicly known to cause death, suicide, cardio vascular damage, chemical dependency, depression, tics, weight loss, appetite loss, school shootings and many other things for something that can't even be proven.' Smith, from Michigan, lost his fourteen year old son Matthew to long-term Ritalin use, in 2000. According to Dr. Ljuba Dragovic, the Chief Pathologist of Oakland County, upon autopsy, Matthew's heart showed clear signs of small vessel damage caused from the use of Ritalin. Matthew had had no pre-existing heart condition or defect.
'Disingenuous comparisons between physical and mental illness and medicine are simply part of psychiatry's orchestrated but fraudulent public relations and marketing campaign,' says Dr. Baughman.
Many seem to share these views including the late Dr. Loren Mosher, a noted psychiatrist and clinical professor of Psychiatry at the University of California, San Diego, and former Chief of the Center for Studies of Schizophrenia at the National Institute of Mental Health. Mosher famously resigned from the American Psychiatric Association in 1998 due to Psychiatry's growing "unholy alliance" with the multi-billion dollar pharmaceutical industry.
'Psychiatry has become drug dependent ( that is, devoted to pill pushing ) at all levels - private practitioners, public system psychiatrists, university faculty and organizationally,' Mosher wrote before attacking the field as being mechanistic, reductionistic, tunnel-visioned and dehumanising.
Between the years of 1990-2000, over 569 children were hospitalized in the USA due to the effects of ADHD medication, according to the FDA MedWatch program. 186 deaths were also reported, yet critics point out that MedWatch is a voluntary reporting scheme and that these numbers represent no more than 10 to 20% of the actual incidence.
'Modern psychiatry has forgotten the Hippocratic principle,' Mosher once wrote. 'Above all, do no harm.'
###
PSYCHBUSTERS
Decoding Psychiatric Propaganda
http://groups.msn.com/psychbusters
THE IRVINGS AND THE LOCAL MEDIA WORKING HAND IN HAND WITH THE NEW BRUNSWICK HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION????
There’s something that I don’t understand and maybe someone can helped me with this one?
Are the Irvings, local media and the New Brunswick Human Rights Commission working hand in hand?
My concern is this one?
At least once a month, we always read or see newscasts about cases with the Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission.
Here in New Brunswick? You don’t hear a whisper.
I know for a fact! Once I go into their Human Rights building, the employees are always on the phones.
But the public don’t hear or read nothing about these complaints.
Why is that now?
A few people have asked me the reason the media didn’t cover the complaint of political activism?
This is the very first case in this province.
It’s been accepted by not a whisper from the media.
I believe the Irvings are keeping these issues from the public for a reason.
Take a look at the FAPO meeting a few weeks ago where I was a guess speaker. I spoke loud and clear about boarders and roomers rights.
I didn’t know there was a Irving employee from the Daily Gleaner in the room.
He’s the guy in a black suit up front.
He must be a young reporter who’s just following orders from the Irvings not to cover my concerns. The next day many people at the meeting couldn't understand the reson this issue wasn't covered by the Irvings?
I asked the Daily Gleaner months ago to do a story on this issue. At the meeting? Many had concerns of this issue.
We’re the only province in Canada that boarders or roomers have no rights whatsoever.
Go to VIVENEW BRUNSWICK.COM for more information on this issue.
Just click on this website- target="_blank">Charles
Blog
It’s just another issue that proves my point about the Irving’s monopoly in this province.
If a reporter covers my concerns? They will be fired right on the spot.
At the end, they will have to leave New Brunswick because the Irvings owns all the newspapers in this Province.
The Irvings are trying to brainwash the public via the papers but it’s not working!
I don’t have a big ego but I was the main attraction of the evening because I told the audience sad stories such as a roomer who was force to sh@t in a garbage bag because the caretaker didn’t wish him to use the washroom but not a whisper in the paper the next day on this issue.
I might add that they can evict you and you have one hour to leave the building!
I believe that the Irvings wish to keep the poor population in check by denying the poor to have a voice or to be heard.
I believe that I have proven in the past that I am not a media hound but facts are facts!
First we have the Irvings who are denying the rights to New Brunswickers to write letters to the Editor.
Just a few months ago, the Rogers Television have joined the Irvings in denying New Brunswickers rights to phone their talk shows.
Which reminds moi? I have to write that letter to the C.R.T.C.!
So what gives anyway? Yes, I believe that the Irvings have given the orders not to cover any complaints that goes to the New Brunswick Human Rights Commission because they don’t wish New Brunswickers to know there’s a place that can complaint.
The media in the Capital must cover this very important issue!!!
But I knew there was a place to complain and look what happened to me 4 years ago?
The New Brunswick Human Rights Commision sent me a letter telling me that my complaint was without merit!
It was a very racist and discriminatory case against the Irvings.
Ok Charles…don’t get yourself going early in the morning…go have a coffee….lol…..
But seriously? I don’t understand the reason New Brunswickers don’t hear about Human Rights cases in the Province by the media?
Nova Scotians hear cases all the time but not here?
Is there a reason? You tell moi????
Are the Irvings, local media and the New Brunswick Human Rights Commission working hand in hand?
My concern is this one?
At least once a month, we always read or see newscasts about cases with the Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission.
Here in New Brunswick? You don’t hear a whisper.
I know for a fact! Once I go into their Human Rights building, the employees are always on the phones.
But the public don’t hear or read nothing about these complaints.
Why is that now?
A few people have asked me the reason the media didn’t cover the complaint of political activism?
This is the very first case in this province.
It’s been accepted by not a whisper from the media.
I believe the Irvings are keeping these issues from the public for a reason.
Take a look at the FAPO meeting a few weeks ago where I was a guess speaker. I spoke loud and clear about boarders and roomers rights.
I didn’t know there was a Irving employee from the Daily Gleaner in the room.
He’s the guy in a black suit up front.
He must be a young reporter who’s just following orders from the Irvings not to cover my concerns. The next day many people at the meeting couldn't understand the reson this issue wasn't covered by the Irvings?
I asked the Daily Gleaner months ago to do a story on this issue. At the meeting? Many had concerns of this issue.
We’re the only province in Canada that boarders or roomers have no rights whatsoever.
Go to VIVENEW BRUNSWICK.COM for more information on this issue.
Just click on this website- target="_blank">Charles
Blog
It’s just another issue that proves my point about the Irving’s monopoly in this province.
If a reporter covers my concerns? They will be fired right on the spot.
At the end, they will have to leave New Brunswick because the Irvings owns all the newspapers in this Province.
The Irvings are trying to brainwash the public via the papers but it’s not working!
I don’t have a big ego but I was the main attraction of the evening because I told the audience sad stories such as a roomer who was force to sh@t in a garbage bag because the caretaker didn’t wish him to use the washroom but not a whisper in the paper the next day on this issue.
I might add that they can evict you and you have one hour to leave the building!
I believe that the Irvings wish to keep the poor population in check by denying the poor to have a voice or to be heard.
I believe that I have proven in the past that I am not a media hound but facts are facts!
First we have the Irvings who are denying the rights to New Brunswickers to write letters to the Editor.
Just a few months ago, the Rogers Television have joined the Irvings in denying New Brunswickers rights to phone their talk shows.
Which reminds moi? I have to write that letter to the C.R.T.C.!
So what gives anyway? Yes, I believe that the Irvings have given the orders not to cover any complaints that goes to the New Brunswick Human Rights Commission because they don’t wish New Brunswickers to know there’s a place that can complaint.
The media in the Capital must cover this very important issue!!!
But I knew there was a place to complain and look what happened to me 4 years ago?
The New Brunswick Human Rights Commision sent me a letter telling me that my complaint was without merit!
It was a very racist and discriminatory case against the Irvings.
Ok Charles…don’t get yourself going early in the morning…go have a coffee….lol…..
But seriously? I don’t understand the reason New Brunswickers don’t hear about Human Rights cases in the Province by the media?
Nova Scotians hear cases all the time but not here?
Is there a reason? You tell moi????
God's minute!
NO ONE EVER HAS SEEN GOD; BUT IF WE LOVE
ONE ANOTHER, GOD LIVES IN US, AND HIS LOVE IS
MADE COMPLETE IN US. WE KNOW THAT WE LIVE IN
HIM, AND HE IN US, BECAUSE HE HAS GIVEN US OF
HIS SPIRIT.
( 1 JOHN 4:12-13 *NIV )
Dear Charles,
When we open our hearts and invite God into our lives,
a wonderful thing begins to happen! The Apostle Paul
stated it this way; THEREFORE, IF ANYONE IS IN CHRIST,
HE IS A NEW CREATION; THE OLD HAS GONE, THE
NEW HAS COME! ( 2 CORINTHIANS 5:17 )
As many of you know, this is when we become the
person that God intended us to be. It is also when we
become filled with; THE PEACE OF GOD, WHICH
TRANSCENDS ALL UNDERSTANDING.
( PHILIPPIANS 4:7 )
So Charles, JUST AS YOU RECEIVED CHRIST JESUS AS
LORD, CONTINUE TO LIVE IN HIM, ROOTED AND BUILT
UP IN HIM, STRENGTHENED IN THE FAITH AS YOU
WERE TAUGHT, AND OVERFLOWING IN THANKFULNESS.
( COLOSSIANS 2:6 )
Now my friend, may; THE GRACE OF THE LORD JESUS
CHRIST BE WITH YOUR SPIRIT. Amen.
With My Love & Prayers,
your servant Allen
[ Prayer Requests---Contact Us---Bible Study---*Donations* ]
[ Audio---Subscribe---Change of Address---Unsubscribe ]
at: http://www.godsminute.org
Apostle Paul Ministries, P O Box 55996, Hayward, CA 94545
(c) Copyright 2005 by Apostle Paul Ministries
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)