Tuesday, April 10, 2007
The Irvings use my story but that's ok!!!!!
At first, I didn’t really know how to take this one?
I attended the memorial held for Harry Havens this morning.
An individual approached me afterwards and told me the write up was great.
I thanked her.
She wasn’t talking about my blog. She told me it was in the Irving paper.
Was I confused? You darn right I was!!!
The woman told me the story I wrote in my blog was in the Irving paper?
I quickly said - You mean I made the Evil Irving newspaper????...lol
Hours later, I had a look and sure enough there it was.
The Irvings never asked me if they could used the story but that’s ok! If I would have never blogged the story? Nobody would have known and Harry’s death.
In the case? Harry just didn't became a stat!
The only part I had a problem with was the Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Activist.
I wish they would have just wrote the word- Blogger!!! That’s ok!
It’s nice the Irvings sometime use stories from this blog.
I hope this puts an end to the copyrights issue once and for all!!!
Here’s the story-
Homeless community to honour man who refused to give up at service today
TOOL HELP
By HEATHER MCLAUGHLIN
Published Tuesday April 10th, 2007
Appeared on page A3
His name was Harry Havens.
He was 59.
The name won't mean much to the average Frederictonian.
He wasn't a prominent citizen, business leader, scholar or educator.
At one time, the Woodstock-born Havens had an ordinary life. He was the father of three children, the grandparent of two and had two brothers.
He was a man that local street-outreach volunteer Mavis Doucette remembers with affection for his gritty determination and a sense of humour.
Today at 11 a.m. at Brunswick Street Baptist Church, the city's homeless community and Havens's friends from the community clinic and the community kitchen will have a chance to say goodbye.
Havens rented a single room at a Carleton Street rooming house. He had a mattress on the floor covered by a sleeping bag, a chair, a chest of drawers and a pet cat he snuck indoors.
He moved from Woodstock because he wanted to break free of his addiction to alcohol, Doucette said.
"I don't know how many times he was in and out of detox. He just couldn't seem to overcome it. He would go for months without drinking," Doucette said.
Then he'd fall back.
Doucette once asked Havens how his life spiralled out of control.
"Driving down the road with a steering wheel in one hand and a beer bottle in another," Doucette said he told her.
She met Havens while trolling the streets to check on street people. She told Havens about the services at the community clinic.
Havens asked Doucette if she wanted to go out to dinner.
"I'll see if I can get (former YMCA street-outreach worker) Mike Ryan to take us to the soup kitchen some night," Doucette recalled Havens saying in gentlemanly fashion.
"He just had a great sense of humour."
After Havens died of kidney failure at the Dr. Everett Chalmers Regional Hospital, his family took him back to Woodstock for burial. A memorial service was held April 7, but even bus fare to Woodstock is beyond the reach of many of Havens's friends in the city.
"There's no closure for street people who all knew him and loved him," Doucette said. "They die and you're just supposed to forget them and step on and keep on going."
So Doucette reached out to the community for help, hoping to find a meeting room where friends could get together and pay their last respects.
Brunswick Street Baptist Church offered to help and one of its pastors will lead the service today.
While Havens had a dark side, his humanity shone through, Doucette said.
"Havens really cared for people and that got him in trouble," she recalled.
He'd feel so sorry for someone else that he'd give away what money he had. He'd then try to find odd jobs - such as pushing a shopping cart to pick fiddleheads in the spring and sell them to a local store - to earn enough to hold himself together.
A year ago, four young people mugged him and took his wallet. He ended up with a black eye, bruises and wounds. Another time he got so sick, he could barely walk.
"He'd somehow fight his way back. He was determined and stubborn," Doucette said.
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder activist Charles LeBlanc wrote about Havens on his website called Oldmaison recently.
Havens lived in a room next door to LeBlanc.
"I noticed a few weeks ago he was sitting in his chair with his head down while coughing. He had a cat across from him. The room was full of smoke and Harry was coughing a lot ... At night, you could hear him coughing very hard," LeBlanc wrote on his website.
"I bet he made many prayers for God to take him away from his misery. He was in very bad shape."
Within a day of Havens' death, his room was emptied of his few worldly goods, as was his mini-fridge. The food was shared with the rest of the residents.
"I had a sick feeling in my stomach of the way it happened," LeBlanc wrote. "The room was rented hours later ... The female caretaker really felt bad."
With the room bereft of any personal belongings and the door left wide open, there was little evidence of the person who had been there just days before.
"The only thing left as a memory of Harry are his shoes in the hallway," LeBlanc wrote.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
12 comments:
Wow you've got an ego.
How do you know the reporter didn't find out on her own?
Also, they didnt take you're story. You had the story and they had it. Notably, you had it first, but I wouldn't let it go to your head.
Good work Charles. The above just shows that some people will piss on you no matter what you say or do.
It was blogs like this that make me glad you do what you do even if sometimes you go over the top. When you read about a guy like this, then its understandable to see how you live and why you'd get so upset at the way the woman from the mental health clinic talked. It's true, its often in the way people say things and when you have the experience you did with your neighbour, its more understandable to see why you lose your temper.
Perhaps somebody else did talk to the paper, so what? Irving took much of their information from CHarles and still didn't give Charles website.
They may not say so, but good work CHarles, keep it up. Everybody has an ego, yours was in check for this one.
Hi Charles.
I first read about Harry on your blog yesterday and was quite surprised to read it today in the Gleaner. It was a good story and I'm glad it was written.
You should be proud of yourself to have played a role in ensuring that Harry, your neighbour and friend was not forgotten.
I would like to have attended the service but unfortunately was not able to. However, he was close in my thoughts today.
May he rest in peace.
ps. I thought the description of your as the ADHD activist was a bit over the top too!
Hope to cross paths with you soon......I'm actually surprised that we havent in a while, because when I look at your photos, I have seen some of these scenes........that little puppy today.....saw him on King Street around noon. :)
Actually the "Irvings" researched his history and his backround and gave Charles and his web a plug when they used a few paragraphs at the end of the article anonymous 10:10. Had you read it you might have even noticed yourself. Its called giving credit where credit is due.
Finally a good blog like the good old Charles use to do. No insults no name calling no "Look at me I am Charles LeBlanc" blogs.
Keep it up with these kind of blogs and never mind with the boring old legislature, police force, Irvings, Rogers Cable and especially the "Stay Tuned".
I actually like these types of blogs that talk about good social issues and good blogs about the poor.
Please keep up with these blogs and leave the negative name calling.
Mentioning 'oldmaison' isn't giving credit. Most people reading the paper would have no idea what that meant, and if interested would have perhaps typed www.oldmaison.com or something like that. The only people that would know how to type it in correctly would be people who already go to blogs and already know about it.
Perhaps Charles didn't cut and paste the whole story, and the correct address was given later, but I doubt it.
Come one anonymous 11:05 most people reading the paper wouldn't care what it meant. They gave his name and his blog name. The story wasn't about Charles after all. Try to keep things in perspective.
They didn't give his blog name, they said 'oldmaison' and thats all. Like I said, if somebody were to try to find the blog based on that then they'd have a hard time unless they were familiar with blog. People are always griping at Charles for cutting and pasting, well, 'credit' as every first year university student knows, doesn't mean "I got this from a book by _____". On the internet its quite obvious that credit would be to give his URL address and then people could go to that. THAT is credit, they did just enough to cover their ass.
That's the perspective. Good work Charles, in this case you're a better journalist than the Irvings are.
Anonymous 5:53 read the darned aritcle, they could have easily left thet whole Charles part out and it would have had no effect on the storey. They GAVE Charles the credit by mentioning him when they did. Stop your whinning.
How many times did you copy/paste an Irving newspaper story and put it on your blog without their consent. I'd like to see Robert Jones report on that.
Hi Charles,
Does ADHD give you mind problems. Did you forget that your blog title is "Charles Leblanc political ADHD activist". If you want the media to describe your site in a different manner, change your title.
p.s. I hope your memory comes back.
Y.B.
Am I whinning? That's good to know. Giving credit is posting the website, simple as that. How many times did Charles cut and paste articles-lots, and take a look at the comments section on the people who gave him hell for it.
So once again its proved how much better Charles media is than the Irvings because notice that this conversation is taking place here, at the aggrieved party, NOT in the mainstream media.
So that pretty much makes the point. It's not rocket science people, how hard is it to type the words http://oldmaison.blogspot.com? There, I just did it! Wow, that wasn't hard at all, it was super easy!
On the internet its even easier because they can just make a link that goes right to the website where readers could have linked to Charles article. That's not hard either.
Actually, I know from reporters that its policy to NEVER give the websites of other sources. It's not just Charles, but in this case its pretty blatant and once again proves why it sucks to only have one media owner for the entire province.
However, as Charles says, its 'ok' because at least they covered it and now more people will know about it. It's just too bad they don't know how to give credit where its due. Of course we know that this is part of a larger story, because although Charles is frequently in the news with a protest or an arrest or meeting politicians, his website has NEVER been mentioned by Irvings press. Yet we did see a case where they mentioned websites on a specific story about websites, namely when the 'trenchcoat' figure made some political claims. That story linked to Spinks site, which pretty much just parrots the Irving party line, and one other, I forget which, but while Charles is one of the most infamous bloggers and easily New Brunswick's most successful blogger, they didn't even talk to him.
That's not surprsing, because its part of a larger system of propaganda. During the by-election to get roomers and boarders rights, the issue was only mentioned once in one sentence during the entire campaign. Yet it was so important that the liberals made it there first proposal on Doherty's first day, and Lord mentioned the issue in his throne speech. So clearly it was important, yet Irving gave it one mention in one story on one day, and didn't even explain it or bother to link to the site which had extensive coverage of it.
So, for example, the fact that New Brunswick is the ONLY province where roomers and boarders don't have these basic rights was never mentioned, even though that's a pretty basic statement and you'd think a news report would cover that.
So this is a very important issue because its connected to the larger system of Irving policy. In order to qualify as at least a moderately responsible article, they felt they had to at least mention the 'old maison' part, but that's it.
This is also exclusive to Irving, when Charles set up the broadcastnb site, CBC's information morning had a story on audio on the internet and they mentioned his site directly. You can also go and read larger newspapers such as the Globe and Mail and National Post where they frequently give out website addresses. However, like I said, at Irvings it is policy not to. I suspect that policy is different if an Irving company is involved, but by all means don't believe me, if you get their paper you know this full well, so just go through old papers and try to find any.
Post a Comment