It was another good journalism story by Robert John. < My hero >
It's not on the CBC website but I guess it's petro for Coleson Cove and the stuff flies all over the place in Saint John!!!
Saint Johners are in big trouble for their health and there's nothing that can be done because the Irving's lobbylists are in control of the Capital.
Hey? Maybe it's maybe its them who sent those bouncers to have me harm or killed at Sweetwaters?
Click below for that story -
target="_blank">Charles
Blog
11 comments:
The bouncers were not going to kill you. Stop exagerating, they just told you to leave and if you didn't they would have escorted you out. No killing, if you would have fought them then maybe they would have defended themselves and yes that would have hurt you.
The SJ and petroleum coke well that I have to agree with you Charles. SJers will pay for that with their health and a poluted environment.
I think your talking about petroleum coke or petcoke as they call it. It can be messy to work with and according to the article on CBC it sure does appear to have been handled incorrectly. A situation that should not be tolerated and the company (who ever it is) should be held responsible and corrected before any more is unloaded. What it doesn't show is the stuff flying all over the city of Saint John nor does the CBC article seem to suggest that was the case. I also couldn't happen but notice they seemed to see no connection to your supposed near death experience at Sweetwaters. Is it possible that everything that happens in this province is NOT directly related to you after all?
Someone knew what they were doing at Sweetwaters.
If I would have racted? I would have been dead!
Many people were killed by bouncers in New Brunswick!!!
I emailed Rick Miles for some info but he didn't reply to his email.
Someone from the Liberal Party sent these bouncers to do me great harm and I'm going to find out who?
Speaking of violence? Something happened to me at noon....
Stay tuned....
Irving's Lobbylists???
Who truly knows???
Of course they knew what they were doing Charles, they had your name on a list. No one sent the bouncers after you. They simply told you to leave. That has nothing to do with anyone wanting you dead. That you might have been hurt if you tried to enter an establishment that you were obviously asked not to would have been your fault and no one else. You were more likely to be killed crossing the street to get to Sweetwaters than to ever be killed by a bouncer. How much longer before that car that turns the corner as you cross an intersection becomes some plot to "do you serious harm"? Its getting pretty close to that kind of nonsense already. It is the paranoid statements that you repeat here like this that demonstrate more clearly than anything else why you no longer are taken seriously on the majority of topics you blog these days.
Listen Passing Gas?
This is a very serious issue.
A member of the Liberal Party of good standing is invited to a Liberal Christams Party. < Twice >
and this happens?
Someone gave the orders and the liberal Party as we speak are investigating this serious issue.
Stay tuned....
Charles, that the liberals didn't want you at their Christmas party is NOT a sign they want you harmed or killed. So although investigating why you were sent invitations is a worth while cause and is a serious issue for you. Accusing them of wanting you harmed adds nothing to that cause. Frankly what it does is make you sound like some kind of a nut case..I am sorry about saying that but you have to see that carrying on like this does nothing but harm your reputation. You do have things to say that are worth hearing, but darn it Charles saying things like this does not help one bit. It might make your blog popular but it makes what you have to say irrelevant and thats just a shame. If being popular is more important to you then I guess you will just keep going down that road but that would be a shame.
I agree with the above, sort of. There are other political bloggers in NB, but none with Charles 'style'. As one poster said, they never know what Charles is going to come out with but they keep coming back for more.
Whether its meant to be flamboyant or not I don't know. It's Charles blog though, and tying himself into the stories is at least clever, even if it doesn't add to it.
This isn't a lobby blogsite, so people who want to complain that Charles isn't acting enough like the CBC or Irving media should keep that in mind.
I do agree that the Sweetwaters thing is overblown. Only Charles could come up with the logic that if somebody asked him to leave then therefore they would know he would react and they could hurt him which means somebody was trying to hurt him or kill him. However, that's Charles.....
Charles doesn't seem to see that a political party is more than one person, and just because he got two invitations doesn't mean everybody would welcome him.
However, as for the environmental issue, I think Charles is right to 'overblow' it for the simple reason that environmental issues are consistently 'underblown' in the province (and most provinces). Fumes and dust can blow a long way, perhaps not to downtown St. John, but who knows?
Appears charles knows what he talking about,no need for you to repeat after him,unless your learning.Charles knows coleson cove has switch to petroleummm coke
The pet coke is (or should have been)the story here and it is good to see that Charles has in fact "re-blogged" it. That was the point. The Sweetwaters nonsense actually takes away from what was something worth blogging about. This may not be a "lobby blogsite" but Charles has stated more times than enough that he is a "journalist". No one expects a CBC like Charles blog but as of late there has been little of any a journalistic nature in here and that is worth pointing out to Charles even if he chooses to ignore it.
I am a court appointed journalist and that's the way it is!!!
Irving's journalists would be invited to a Party and given free beers and a few bucks!!!
Not with the biggest blogger and biggest bullshitter in New Brunswick????
What do the liberals do???
SEND THREE BOUNCERS AGAINST THE GUY!!!!!
I am starting to believe it's not the Liberal Party but the Irving Party!!!!!
Charles you have finally started to believe your own hype. The courts do not appoint journalists so of course that suggestion is a false one and you really must know that. But that being said you did at one time have the opportunity to at least be something of an important local blogger with some sort of journalistic integrity. But sadly you have decided that being popular is more important. More to the point that the number of visits to your blog is all that really
matters. Now there is nothing wrong with being popular Charles, but when it's gained by printing nonsense and insults why would you be surprised to find yourself on the outside looking in? So please keep it up if you want the attention. I find you still humorous to the point I have to visit..(even if it means being one of your visitor numbers) but only very rarely is their something worth any more than a shake of the head, a little smile and a sarcastic comment. Sadly you are no longer an activist or a blogger journalist only one of many that will pretty much say and do anything to stay "the peoples choice".
Post a Comment