Wednesday, February 08, 2006

NEW BRUNSWICK FAMILY SERVICES ARE REFUSING TO HELP THIS POOR WOMAN!!! THE QUESTION IS WHY????

This past Saturday while walking by the Farmer's Market. I notice the poor disable woman still panhandling. New Brunswick Family Services is still refusing to help this poor soul.

You can read about her in a blog I wrote last week. Just click here-
target="_blank">Charles
Blog


jmacalpine
Picture 031

She landed in the hospital a few days ago. If something happens to her? Maybe the Bernard Lord Government can be held responsible for her death? Stay tune!!!


Picture 033

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

I never was a Bible Pounder, but I have heard man a folk say the old saying, There But For The Grace Of God, Go I.

Anonymous said...

You said she was only 48 - why can't she find work? The Government finds work for many with disabilities or does she not want to work?

Anonymous said...

It's called Exploitation.

Exploitation of:
The Poor
The Disabled
The Disfuntional
The disadvantaged
The Handicapped
The Working poor
The weak
The volnerable
The Unemployed
The Homeless
Social Assistance
Special Care
Mental Illness

etc...etc..

The big picture is quite self evedent.
If it doesn't say Corperate in front of Your Conservative Support Card, you don't have a chance in the Province of New Brunswick.

Socializm is not and will not ever be a part of the Conservative Government's platform

Anonymous said...

Hey Charles....read this one....

NB Telegraph-Journal | Courts/Crime
As published on page A1/A2 on February 8, 2006

Court seeks explanation from N.B. bureaucrat
Province cuts ties to man, which judge says puts public in 'grave danger'

By David Shipley
Telegraph-Journal

SAINT JOHN - A provincial court judge has summoned a high-ranking bureaucrat to explain why the province severed its responsibility and put a 20-year-old man with a history of violence and sexual deviance on the street.

Kevin Edward Bishop of Sussex has been under the care of the department since he was eight years old. During that time he has undergone a battery of tests that indicate he has an insatiable sexual appetite and poses a danger to the public.

Mr. Bishop left provincial jail late last week after serving a 90-day sentence for assaulting an employee at a group home where he lived. He became enraged when the women unplugged a television to get his attention, striking her with his fists and a telephone.

As he prepared to finish his sentence, Family and Community Services abruptly ended its 12-year involvement with him, leaving him on the street with $10 in his pocket.

That put him in breach of his probation order, which requires him to live in a home approved by Family and Community Services and Probation Services. It also landed him back in Judge Henrik Tonning's court.

"Everyone who has anything to do with Mr. Bishop, ever, knows this is the wrong thing to do," said Judge Tonning of the department's decision to cut its ties with Mr. Bishop.

"If, in fact, he is placed in a situation where there is no supervision, the public is in grave danger. . . . The offences he will commit involve violence and they are sexual in nature and the victims are often young."

Judge Tonning said while Family and Community Services "didn't have the courtesy" to send a representative to Mr. Bishop's probation hearing, he would not allow the department to simply walk away from his court.

The judge then subpoenaed André Lepine, director of services for adults with disabilities and seniors, to appear next Tuesday to explain the department's reasoning.

A pre-sentence report done in 2004 indicated Mr. Bishop has an insatiable sexual appetite with sexual interests that are extremely concerning, said Judge Tonning.

Given the reports on file about Mr. Bishop, Judge Tonning said it was "beyond belief" that the department let a post-guardianship agreement with Mr. Bishop expire while he was in jail.

The judge said he wondered if the department was simply waiting for Mr. Bishop to commit a crime and end up back in jail.

"I hope that isn't what's going to happen," he said.

A spokesman for Family and Community Services said Tuesday the department could not even confirm if Mr. Bishop was a client, let alone discuss the circumstances of a specific case.

Anonymous said...

Man, welcome to New Brunswick! I really have to laugh when people see people on the street and say 'why don't they get a job'. Come on now, what ARE you thinking. I know people who are young with degrees who can't find work, let alone a disabled elderly woman.

Anonymous said...

Can you at least tell us why she is on the street? I hear all these unrelated stories about pedophiles in sussex and cases that are totally unrelated, but what the hell is SHE on the street for? You place these BLOGS on this so called site but I can't seem to figure out what your message is Mr. Leblanc.

Anonymous said...

Are you brain dead? Do you watch the news and ask 'what is your reason for showing me this?' The blog is to let people know what is going on. The message is pretty self explanatory, if you need to ask, then you probably shouldn't be here. This is the place you go when you want to find out what is REALLY going on in the capital. You won't see these stories in the Irving Press or on Rogers. These are stories about people, most of them poor people.

It's a blog, which means that people can post anything. The pedophile story wasn't by Charles but by somebody who thought it important enough to share. I'm glad they did, because I hadn't heard about it. Anybody can post stuff to Charles blog so long as they don't swear or threaten, you are welcome to as well. That's what makes the internet so great, personally, I've seen A LOT of blogs, and Charles' stands head and shoulders above almost all of them. On a good day he gives the media a good run for their money.

It's called 'participatory journalism' and if more New Brunswickers took part it would be a hell of a lot better province. I suspect that's why the government canned McKenna's idea of 'a computer in every home and every one connected to a high speed network'. It's simply become too dangerous to them. Could you imagine if there were a Charles in EVERY part of New Brunswick? I'd love it, but you can see why the government wouldn't.

Anonymous said...

Some people just don't really want to know what is happening and for those ones go back to your corner of the world and pretend everything is alright. People who know about the suffering of people please bring things forward; at least it is better then ignoring it. We have a social service plan but everyone fits their list of restrictions. Thanks for this site.