Friday, May 12, 2006

WHY IS CHARLES IS LABEL AS A SECURITY RISK AT THE NEW BRUNSWICK LEGISLATURE???


q1, originally uploaded by Oldmaison.

Picture 019
har
charles_jim
Charles 04_07_05 071

Many newcomers who wishes to know the details? Just click here for the whole story -

target="_blank">Charles
Blog

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

if charles you really have been deemed a security risk [ and i don't blame them, if they have lablelled you ] it's because you would drive a sane person to insanity with all your wild ranting and raving.

i don't know why you just don't become an evangelistic preacher, with all that god stuff you 've been posting on your site.

your site used to really be provocative in a very informative display and lay out.

keep to the adhs issue. i know your site claims as well to be about other importnat issues about new brunswick.

but what in the heck do stupid dog pictures, and religous stuff have anything to do with important new brunswick issues.

Gezzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz get it together man

Anonymous said...

Good on you Charles! Nice work on CBC today!

Anonymous said...

I heard the interview. Also the follow-up.

It was a very good presentation by all.

This issue here is really all about "What / Who is a real Journalist"

Not an easy one.

The fact that you have stong opinion seems to be a reason to disqualify You.

BUT

then what about Rex Murphy and all other columnists.

Luc

PS
Someone hates you. He/She must have a loose tile or two....

Anonymous said...

Because you are a security risk. You are unpredictable. You have said many times you love brawls and that relaxes you. You are plain crazy and a lunatic. I agree with the post above 1:15 PM. People who are criticizing you are not your enemies. They want to help and put some sense in your ranting. You can make a difference if you listen to reason instead you insist on being a lunatic.

You tell the whole world what they should do. You tell Irvings how they should run their business. They must be doing something right that they are multi-billionaire and you continue to be a penniless lunatic fringe. You have this stupid little blog and you control the comments. You tell people off when they give you constructive criticism because “it is your shi**y little blog” and Irvings have no right who to hire and fire. Practice what you preach. No one asks for your advice yet you give unsolicited shi**y advice to the whole world. You are a security risk for sure. People are afraid to stand next to you.

Anonymous said...

Charles, we met a while back, at the Human Rights Commission, you were there with horn. and at the legislature, I am the one who was protesting CBC STOP RACISM. any way, today I heard the CBC from Vancouver ref to your Legislature Reporting, you did well, and the two others were giving good info, It is Freedom of Speach, the consitution of the REPORTERS cannot stop you from that, and I cannot see how they Sgt. at Arms has classified you as a security rish, Looks like its the old boys club. this means your are effective. Keep up the good work. I hope you can get to the Legislature as a Blog Reporter. FANTASTIC. I think the coverage will help you, and you have given me an idea to start my own blog. Will be if Fredericton this summer, hope to see you, Take care and Blog on. Joe

BONNEVIE

Blogger Charles LeBlanc said...

I saw your last name Joe and I knew exactly who you were....as a matter of fact? We were talking about you last week....what's up in Vancouver???

Anonymous said...

The issue isn't just the press gallery, its the secrecy of government. As they said,why can't any New Brunswicker ask questions of their government? THe guy from the press gallery was full of it, I loved how the two next guests said "it definitely shouldn't be journalists who decide this". Yet here we have Irving and Rogers calling the shots.

The fear that if they opened up questions that suddenly thousands f people will show up is just crazy. The majority of people ignore politics if they can.

God bless the lunatic fringe Charles, even your critics are among them!

Anonymous said...

If he does not scare people through his lunatic behaviour he would have been long permitted in the press gallery. Now there is not a chance in hell. He has scared people off. He is good at it. People are plain afraid.

Anonymous said...

Charles is labelled a security risk because the big boys club is afraid that he may bring too much heat down on them if too many people find out that the beuracracy does not have the answers to the questions that Charles ask's. They cringe in fear and their fat assholes must pucker as hard as an inside out wood knot when he asks why the poor has to walk in unplowed streets to get to the soup kitchen while walking to the diplomat restaurant can be done on plowed sidewalks, or when he asks why a campaign promise was not kept, or why the crisis of the homeless can not be dealt with effectively or why rats are poluting our water supply. Oh yes i can just see their little assholes puckering and them grabbing their wallets in fear, all at the thought that something Charles has mentioned has just cost them money they should have spent in the first place.In fact it's probably one of those puckered assholes thats calling him a lunatic and accusing him of raving on in his reporting. Why i bet those posters have'nt even been to the soup kitchen or are one of those who has made a campaign promise and broke it.It sure does seem like something has rattled their cage. Maybe it's for affect, yeah thats it, hey i know, lets discredit charles because what he is saying is right but the general public can't know this somebody will know we are not doing our jobs. Your pathetic. Leave Charles alone and crawl back under that rock you only crawled out of, because you've been threatened to be found out that your not worth the powder to blow you to hell. None of you beauracrats are, that pray on the weak and the poor. (Robert Sewell, Fredericton N.B.)