Why would the Irvings deny his name being mention in my letter to the editor??? I truly believe that the public should watch this individual very closely.
I got to asks Abel LeBlanc about this guy?
He knows them all.....
6 comments:
Anonymous
said...
Oh, come on! A mole for the Irvings??? Anyone who knows Tom Mann's history in New Brunswick knows that he is not working for the Irvings!! Charles, it's time to brush up on your history/politics before you make such accusations. No one in their right mind would ever believe that suggestion. hahahahahaha, it's laughable. There is no story to be uncovered. hahahahahha. You're too funny. Barking up the wrong tree with this one!
Now you have crossed all the limits of being ludicrous. You are miles into insanity. Irving papers did not mention your name either when they published Mann’s letter. Are you actually Irving mole and not disclosing it?
Speaking of right minds, typing "hahaha" is the far side of crazy. As for Irvings, as a union leader Mr. Mann would have extensive contacts with Irvings-as does just about everybody in this province.
I agree with the other comments. Seriously Charles, there is a picture of you shaking J.D. Irving's hand...I think you're the Irving mole! This story has gotten crazier by the day. There is no conspiracy against you. You were disruptive, you were banned, end of story. I don't think there is anyone would dispute that. The Unions of this province have fought hard against the Irvings for a long time. I think the only thing they'd agree on now is that you are disruptive and abusive. There, you've given something the Unions and the Irvings can agree on. Bravo :)
6 comments:
Oh, come on! A mole for the Irvings??? Anyone who knows Tom Mann's history in New Brunswick knows that he is not working for the Irvings!! Charles, it's time to brush up on your history/politics before you make such accusations. No one in their right mind would ever believe that suggestion. hahahahahaha, it's laughable. There is no story to be uncovered. hahahahahha. You're too funny. Barking up the wrong tree with this one!
Now you have crossed all the limits of being ludicrous. You are miles into insanity. Irving papers did not mention your name either when they published Mann’s letter. Are you actually Irving mole and not disclosing it?
Speaking of right minds, typing "hahaha" is the far side of crazy. As for Irvings, as a union leader Mr. Mann would have extensive contacts with Irvings-as does just about everybody in this province.
Charles, I'm sorry, but this is crazy.
I agree with the other comments. Seriously Charles, there is a picture of you shaking J.D. Irving's hand...I think you're the Irving mole! This story has gotten crazier by the day. There is no conspiracy against you. You were disruptive, you were banned, end of story. I don't think there is anyone would dispute that. The Unions of this province have fought hard against the Irvings for a long time. I think the only thing they'd agree on now is that you are disruptive and abusive. There, you've given something the Unions and the Irvings can agree on. Bravo :)
Never once have I've been warn and nobody knows or refuses to tell me the reasons?
Of course beside Kelly Lamrock? I haven't seen any MLA'S!
Don't worry...I'll get to the bottom of this very discriminated or anti-Democrated action.
My main concentration is Irving mole Tom Mann.......
Stay tune....
Post a Comment