Thursday, July 13, 2006

Should these elected officials be questioned by New Brunswickers?


IMG_5010, originally uploaded by Oldmaison.

Tanker Malley, Cy LeBlanc, John Betts, Bev Harrison, Jeannot Volpe, Elvy Robichaud, Stuat Jamieson, Kelly Lamrock and Shawn Graham are against a true demoncracy???

These individuals are responsible for me being banned for life from the Legislature. Lets not forget Dan Bussieres also.

The paper trial is very interesting and it leads me towards the Liberal workers. One thing is certain. I can't wait to confront these individual face to face.

If they believe a person should be evicted from the Legislature without just cause? Well, they shouldn't be power because it would be very dangerous.

Stay tune for more because this issue will not go away! Not from a long shot!!!!

IMG_3674
IMG_3690
STB_2514
STB_0673
1
10

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

And you are the only one who is the guardian of democracy. Get a grip of yourself. Is there anyone left that you have not pissed off yet.

Anonymous said...

they were just afraid you might find out something that they don't want the public to know.

Anonymous said...

I'd say it was more like they simply don't like people who 'rock the boat'. The main thing that keeps politicians in power is the masses. Although politicians rank lower than lawyers in popularity, people still have faith in 'the system'. This is mostly because most people know nothing about it. Having charles around was just a royal pain, and even more dangerous, he had public sympathy towards getting a press pass.

That would be VERY dangerous, and the Irvings certainly don't want that. In a democracy the issue isn't why the hell can't Charles attend a press conference and ask questions, the issue is why can't ANYBODY do it. These people supposedly work for us, yet we have zero control over them.

And of course it worked perfectly, the whole issue now is just getting Charles entrance to the legislature, virtually nobody is talking about getting a press pass. The issue 'has been neutralized'.

It also accomplishes something else, mainly keeping Charles focused on 'what is happening to him' and not what is happening in government or to the poor. Even those who defend him now aren't talking about press passes, because most people know nothing about Charles, so when they hear he's been banned they assume that he must have done SOMETHING to deserve it.

But to the first poster here, that is right on the money. In fact, in a functioning democracy a reporter SHOULD be despised by those in power. When reporters are all chummy with politicians you can forget about objectivity, even honesty. That Charles is despised by so many in the legislature (yet very few among regular folk) is the surest reason why he SHOULD be given a press pass.