An interesting point of view. Mind you he is incorrect about the fact you collected the signatures all yourself..(as pointed out in your own blog complete with pictures).Also the picture that he "suggests" was taken during a verbal encounter in the streets with you recently is nothing but a bold faced lie. Anyone that has spent any time on your web page knows it is from the pipeline protests and has been around for a very long time.I am sure that you have already informed this blogger that he must make changes in his article as you would never want to be part of deceit such as this.On the other hand he is just a blogger, would anyone actually expect him to be responsable, ethical or even truthful?
Leblanc is giving bad to good people. His usual practice and stupidity.
The first point has criticisms that need to be proven. Where exactly did Charles get somebody else to collect signatures for him? I never saw that (I'm not saying its not true). The picture is another issue. He was at the gas demonstration, but that doesn't mean Jamieson wasn't talking (or yelling) at Charles. Charles never said who he was yelling at. However, while its not a flattering picture, he doesn't look like he's 'enraged' and his fist doesn't look clenched. He may be angry, and I've also heard the story about the antics going on in the legislature by these grown up adolescants. I tend to agree about the point of the article, it may be clear that Charles was 'a pain' in the legislature, but thats no grounds to ban somebody. Some of the MLA's obviously are more of a physical threat than charles and have proven it, and that doesn't even get into the fact that no evidence is ever made public. However, I can't make heads or tails out of the last few paragraphs.
Also the picture that he "suggests" was taken during a verbal encounter in the streets with you recently is nothing but a bold faced lie. Anyone that has spent any time on your web page knows it is from the pipeline protests and has been around for a very long time.Just passing is right Charles, if you're going to win this fight against the government, you must veer away from endorsing such articles or blogs that blatantly misconstrue the facts. As you know, I am all for your fight against the government's cencoring of free speech (or more specific your banishment), however, if you want more individuals (like myself) to take you seriously, then I would advise you not to associate yourself with people who lack serious credibility as it, in turn, hurts your own in the end.
Did I miss something here????I collected all the names and that's that!!!The picture was taken in Saint John last November during a confrontation between Stuart and the protesters.As a matter of fact? I got the same face this morning from Stuart.He wasn't too please with me about going public on a issue.Stay tuned....
Nuff said then.
Now Charles be honest. Twice your blogged how people helped you on your petition. In bright orange text you state "The Irving's are Helping Charles With His Petition" and then there is "Charles hits 800 Signatures With Some Help" and there in living colour is a picture of that Shawn fella with a petition in his hand. (don't you just love it when people take things out of context, but then you do know how that works now don't you Charles). Why that was just like what was done in the article in question right here with your pictures ...Quite a coincidence don't you think?
Post a Comment