This is very serious stuff!!!! The Irvings are always printing lying stuff about me in their papers and now this???
I hope that Jamie Irving knows that I can continue a battle without a blog???
The Irvings use my ordeal in their paper and I can't blog it???
Old Germany again???
Here's the email-
Charles, I'm afraid you have been warned. We have repetitively asked you NOT to violate copyright laws by republishing articles from CanadEast without permission. At each warning you have thumbed your nose at our request and flagrantly continued to violate the law. At each instance we have kept detailed records and screen shots of your violations and your comments about them. There are no more chances.
We are now in contact with Goggle, who take copyright violation very seriously, and I'm afraid you can probably expect them to revoke your Blogger access. Please DO NOT even try to rant that its the Irvings out to bring you down again because you have nobody to blame but yourself. You have violated our copyrights over ten times in the past year and we simply cannot tolerate this unlawful behaviour anymore. You were politely warned and chose not to rectify the situation. Now you will have to suffer the consequences just like everybody else.
Sincerely,
Scott Agnew
Web Services Manager
CanadaEast Interactive
78 comments:
Go Scott Agnew.
It's about time someone takes this rude ignorant person off the internet. I am tired of being insulted by this guy. Taking a picture of me and calling me a beauricrat just because I wear a suit and tie to work. I don't even work for the government.
Must be nice making good money to read my blog all day????
I wish I had a good like that one???
:P
Thank you God. There is a justice. No more harassing people on the streets.
Go Scott Agnew go. Get rid of this nuisance.
Shut him down. That is the only language he may understand. Although nothing sinks in.
Don't worry Charles, if google decided to revoke a person's blogger account on the basis of cutting and pasting news article or for the omission of a quotation/hat tip/source, then they basically would have to revoke at least half the google accounts of North American bloggers as well as globally.
Let me tell you, if you've surfed blogs as long as I have, you realize that most bloggers don't even come close to understanding the intricacies of copyright rules or journalistic standards.
Keep blogging away buddy as the statement by Scott Agnew sounds like a very languorous threat to me.
For the record, taking Mr Leblanc "off the internet" is not my concern. What is my concern as Web Services Manager for the online division of Brunswick News Inc. is the protection of our copyrights. We have politely asked Mr. Leblanc to cease and desist from violating these copyright son a number of occasions. He has refused to remove offending articles and continues to violate our copyrights time and time again. Copyright laws exist for a reason and it is my obligation to enforce our rights under the law. As i said in my previous email, Mr. Leblanc has nobody to blame but himself. He was given ample opportunity to correct the problem. He chose to do nothing. And also, for the regard, Jamie Irving has nothing to do with this situation Mr. Leblanc. As publisher of the Telegraph Journal, Mr. Irving has little to do with the day to day operations at CanadaEast Interactive. I'm sure Mr. Irving has many more important issues to deal with on a daily basis.
I see that all my fans are very happy.
:P
This issue cannot be debated with the Irvings because they have blocked my email.
So therefore I can.t send them an email but it would be interesting to see if the Irvings who have bloggers on their payroll?
To see the Irvings go against Bloggers would be a great story for the CBC?
I wish the Irvings would do like they did during my trial in Saint John.
They ignore the story but picked it up once the story hit the New York Times-
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/27/business/media/27blog.html?ex=1322283600&en=18bfd70c0ed20a88&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
But this is different. It's the information highway so lets see what Jamie Irving and lawyers will do?
This could be the start of a big story of freedom of speech in New Brunswick?
...and yes...Scott Agnew was very rude in his comment....
I met Jamie Irving a few months ago and he wasn[t rude like this guy.......
Hey? I don't have my glasses so maybe what I wrote just don't add up????
TRULY STAY TUNED FOR THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH SAGA IN NEW BRUNSWICK!~!!
It may sound like a "languorous threat" to you but I assure you, we are serious about protecting our copyrights. I would direct you and Mr. Leblanc to Google's own copyright policies as they relate to the Blogger service: http://www.google.com/blogger_dmca.html
We have followed those policies to the letter. I would have preferred it if Mr. Leblanc had done the same.
Sincerely,
Scott Agnew
Web Services Manager
CanadaEast Interactive
You better pray that Mr.Irving don't read comment because he just hates to be call - Mr.Irving.
He just wish to be part of the good old boys and be call- Jamie!!!
:P
Yeah, the Irvings are out to get all the bloggers! Try again Charles. The email is very clear to any semi-intelligent reader. They are not out to stifle free speech, they simply want you to stop stealing their articles. You copy and paste articles from their sites which is a clear violation of their terms of use and intellectual property laws. The Irvings are not out to shut down all bloggers. They have asked you to stop stealing and you told them to go %$#@& themselves. I hope Google does follow their own rules and shuts you down.
Google must understand that I copy and pasted a story done about ME ME ME!!!!
I will never lower myself to share a story from the Irving's papers?
This is all about ME ME ME!!!!
Get it????
The Irvings should be proud that I used a story to promote their rags!!!
Enough said!!!
:P
Hey it's nice to see that you finaly admit that this whole blog is agout YOU YOU YOU. You anything to get attention and nothing about ADHD or Political issues.
Oh really? Is this the "honest" Charles Leblanc speaking? If you'd like, I could probably do a quick search of your blog and pull out a dozen or more articles you cut and pasted from Irving papers that had nothing to do with the oh-so-important Charles. For someone who claims to be an honest "voice of the people", you sure do lie a lot.
Charles, Charles, Charles. Do yourself a favor and read up on copyright and intellectual property law. It makes no difference if you are the subject of a coyprighted story, you still have no right to steal it. Do you think Mohammed Ali has any rights to the movie based on his life? What about Queen Elizabeth? Do you think she should be able to screen the movie The Queen and charge admission to it because she's the subject of the movie. You have very clearly broken the law and Scott Agnew, along with many of your own commenter's, have told you so. You ignored them every time. Now you get what you deserve.
This is very unfortunate, since although its all about 'you', the world doesn't revolve that way.
It is too bad, but not unexpected. I and others told you on numerous cases to simply post the first paragraph or else write your own damn article using footnotes from their article. That's how everybody else does it.
The Irvings have money and clout, and why would google stand up for one blogger who constantly breaks copyright law? If I write a story about Irvings that doesn't mean they own it and can print it if they want to. And actually, the Irvings have been a model of restraint compared to many other corporations out there who will sue people at the drop of a hat. There are corporations that sue because some blogs just 'make them look bad and so are bad for their image'.
But Charles has been warned on numerous occasions. As the bible says, pride goes before destruction. Hopefully Charles will rethink this, what a stupid way to see the blog come to an end. Google takes this stuff very seriously-when they get complaints, which isn't that often.
Hopefully Google will give Charles another opportunity before shutting off the account, I urge Charles to take it. The articles are not even that interesting or integral, what a dumb way to lose an account.
I advise Charles to make a backup of all the articles just in case.
Shows the level of irving intelligence. It is repeatedly asked, not repetitively asked.
You never get it. Now you will say Irvings never warned you and shut you down.
Do other people have rights? You have harassed people at the legislature and they had to ban you. You have been warned not to harass people on the streets and you continue to do that. City of Fredericton must do something and get a pest like you off the streets. You have caused too much nuisance. You are crazy and a kook.
It doesn't matter what the article in the newspaper says...a copyright is a copyright. Charles, you have violated the law and there are consequences.
A blog is like a diary!!! Of course it's about MOI MOI MOI!!!
:p
On a serious note? This is a very small province and the Irvings owns all the newspapers.
Now? I believe the irvings might wish to use me as an example?
Who truly knows?
The story was about me me me and I blogged it.
Sorry...but this is news and the issue of freedom of speech is at risk.
I believe the Irvings should just ignore this blog and let me do what I have to do?
The Irvings shutting down the biggest blogger in this Province and also the biggest bullshitter speaks wonders???
It would be in the history books!!!!
Of course being Charles? I would have to make a trip to Saint John and protest with a huge bullhorn in front of the Golden Ball with a sign- IRVING GESTAPO????
Freedom of speech must remain alive in New Brunswick!
Stopping certain New Brunswickers from speaking to a talk show or cut them off from writing letters to the editor but shutting down blogs is like Old Germany all over again!!!
Charles said: "I believe the Irvings should just ignore this blog and let me do what I have to do?"
Dude are you for real? Why the hell would they, or anyone, do that? Why don't you turn that around and ask yourself the same question?
Why don't you ignore the Irvings and let them do what they have to do?
Holy over-inflated-ego Batman! One for the history books??? Man, people won't remember this 2 days after your gone.
charles you can always turn to this site for you materials.
http://www.broadcastnb.com/
Do you not know that there are limits to one's "freedom of speech"?
http://www.broadcastnb.com/
You want him to continue harassing people. What kind of broadcast is that? Must be rubbish.
This looks like the Legislature stuff all over again. You were warned to behave many times before they had to ban you 'cause you didn't take the warnings seriouly. Charles, the Irvings warned you many times... and you didn't listen.
Its a shame your adviser left the city, he might have told you to let this go, apologize and remove the article as posted. Mind you if I recall correctly he was around for all those other articles so either you never listened or he never was much of an adviser in the first place. All you have managed to show with your rants as posted here is to show Google you not only repeatedly refuse to followed the rules you actually don't even care. It really is a shame to find out you are willing to throw away any good you might have done all because of your own inflated ego. Has this ever really been about anything but your own personal gratification and glory?
I cannot believe that Mr Scott Agnew, Web Services Manager (no less) wrote Goggle (with 2 g's) instead of Google...Twice...In two different postings...Nobody does that...I mean, come on man...Your a Web Service Manager...I bet you 'Google' would take using their name in vain like that a lot harsher than a 'copyright violation'...Give your head a shake...
Charles you said that the Irvings own every newspaper in the province. That is not true at all. They don't own the Miramichi paper the Woodstock paper, the Campbellton paper the French paper and all the other little ones. They only own the biggest ones which are the Moncton paper the Fredericton paper and the Saint John paper.
More lies. It's about time someone did something about this blog. You had the perfect tool to talk and discuss important issues and you turned it into your personal attack tools on New Brunswick citizens, New Brunswick industries, New Brunswick Corporations and the New Brunswick Government.
Well buddy you got yourself in this mess on your own.
If they shut you down then just start another site somewhere else.
No big deal there.
There thousands of other free place to have your site at.
Then you can lash out at the irving there.
"A blog is like a diary"
Then why do you always call yourself a journalist? If writing in a diary makes someone a journalist, a lot of teenaged girls are journalists. Of course they would probably write better than you.
This isn't about freedom of speech. This is about theft. You stole their intellectual property, which is ILLEGAL, so no matter how you spin it, you're wrong, Charles. If the Irvings did this to you, you wouldn't be half as polite as they have been.
Hey Scott Agnew !
Stop bothering Charles.
If he copy and past some of your stuff it only gives you free advertising.
Your just jealous because Charles gets more traffic on his site then your site.
And your newspaper web site sucks!
You Scott Agnew have just opened up a big can of worms.
So leave pore Charles alone or you will be responsible for a pissed off loud mouth Acadian in a tent with a blow horn in front of the Irving building.
You should have left Charles alone.
Charles is not afraid of you Scott Agnew or the Irving.
Charles will not back down from this. He will fight this till the end.
Then with all the bad press the Irving’s will get Scott Agnew will get fired.
Go Charles!
-- maurice the homeless guy --
33 comments? I should stay and debate in the blog more often???
ok.....
I'm moving on.....
Time to blog!!!!
I wont be reading or buying anything published by canadaeast because of this as it has nothing to do with copyright protection! in that case the whole net would have to be wiped out!
They just want to censure You Charles! Your name carries enough weight now you could drop this blog and start another without much problem!
You must be taking a bite out of them as they are starting to attack you! go charles go!!
Irving owns:
The Telegraph Journal, The Times Telegraph, The Daily Gleaner AND
La Catarche
L'etoile
Le Hebdo Chaleur
Here Magazine
Le Journal Madawaska
Kings County Record
KV Style
Miramichi Leader
The Northern Light
The Post Gazette
La Republique
The Tribune
Vibrant Magazine
La Voix de Restigouche
York County Connection
Welcome Magazine
Apart from very few other papers, none with their resources, they own just about all of them.
While Charles is being just plain dumb here, its not possible to post part of an article and link it, since most articles you have to pay for. Plus, they don't have searches for past articles. That means that online posts are the only record for New Brunswickers of important news events.
Another blabber mouth - Maurice the Homo Guy.
Good riddance.
Hmmm, the Irvings giving out free lessons on freedom of speech. Almost as bad as that veil law being pushed by the clueless Marc Mayrand. Laughable.
Instead of picking on those who copy and paste from newspaper articles (90 per cent of the blogosphere), maybe you should spend more time helping out the poor editors at your three daily english rags who continually f%&# up the titles and push through articles with numerous spelling errors.
At this point in the game, I'm starting to truly believe that if the Irving's took their newspapers out of circulation, literacy rates in New Brunswick would increase tenfold.
Oh yeah, while you're at it, instead of demonizing him, maybe you should ask Charles to hold a seminar for your 'popular blogs section'. I mean, let's be honest, even Charles realizes that popular equates people actually reading the stuff. :)
signed
Wiping my ass with the TJ and reading Majesta.
Warren Kinsella, Paul Wells and Small Dead Animals all have posted full articles written by people other than themselves. Two of those three bloggers actually work as journalists for the national post and Macleans.
Yes, they are not using google tools to blog, but regardless, if you go by the copyright laws you cited, it means they are in violation and should be shut down. Very curious behaviour for two individuals who graduated from Carleton with journo degrees and generate more traffic in a day than the Irving online newspapers do in a month.
Let's face it, this is a personal vendetta to shut down someone who exposes you guys for what you are. Let me tell you, if you go through with it, your organization will never recover from the online backlash created by...
Bull. This guy is obnoxious and no one gives a damn. No backlass. Poeple will feel the sigh of relief. He must be banned from the internet, period. I am a blogger but I respect others and not insult people all the time which he does.
Just like everbody else? Scott Agnew please give us this long list of bloggers you have shut down? maybe if new brunswicks press was a really fair,impartial and not controlled by a monopoly we wouldnt need this blog to get out views that dont make it to the mainstream media! shut him down and thier will be a backlash!
I find it hard to believe that their are journalists working for McLeans.
are we allowed to cut out articles in the paper and post them on the bulletin board, or is this against the copyright rule too...
Its different if you HAVE PERMISSION, which two of those three bloggers/writers no doubt have.
Copyright infringement is rampant on the net, we know that. The difference is whether the media or person who owns it will take it to court. Its sadly ironic that if Irving printed a Charles article verbatim, there is almost literally nothing Charles can do about it.
So there COULD be a backlash against Irving, but probably not from New Brunswickers, but from the blogging community.
It's clear that Irving is in the right here, no question about it. It's also clear they can't let this continue. This isn't a case of once or twice or just posting a quarter or half an article. If it continued long term, then it sets a precedent. If somebody else set up a blog and simply cut and posted the most interesting articles, then why would anybody buy the papers?
So Irving HAS to do something here. Hopefully Google will give Charles a first warning, then his complaint will not be with Irving but with Google 'shutting down free speech'.
PS, that was the funniest damn thing I've read in awhile- "wiping my ass with the TJ and reading Majesta" I'm going to copyright infringe that one!
You will be sorry Scott Agnew!
You should have done some research on Charles Leblanc.
If you did you would not have bothered him.
He might be too old for a fist fight but he has the biggest mouth in the world and he will go to the extreme to fight for what he bereaves in whether its right or wrong.
He will never forget it.
He never forgot about the anything the that happened with golf, the shipyard or anything the Irving’s did to him.
Same as the leg, Dan Bustier etc.
When the cops arrested him did he back down? No he did not and its not over yet.
Do you think he will ever forget that you tried to shut down his blog Scott Agnew ?
You have no idea what a mess you got yourself and the Irving’s into.
If you do succeed to shut down this blog then Charles will just start another one somewhere else.
With all the attention you have brought to the TJ and the Irving’s you will end up losing your job.
Big deal if he copied some stuff from your rag. Who did it hurt? Nobody that’s who.
You will now have a ugly, pissed off Acadian after you.
If you knew Charles you wouldn’t have pissed him off.
Leave him alone!
-- maurice the homeless guy --
For someone who does not allow profanity on their blog, I would politely request that you post the entirely of your email to me on your blog VERBATIM. If you don't, please cease and desist from sending me childish, profane and threatening emails (you did warn me to watch my back which could easily be taken as a threat to my personal safety).
Now, as I've said before, I have no wish to have your blog removed. All I've asked is that you obey the law as it relates to copyright and more specifically to our copyright. If you obeyed the law, there would be no problem here. The ball has been in your court since I sent the first request to remove our copyrighted material from your site.
You ignored several polite requests. Now you send personal threats against me. I would advise you to be very careful or you may find yourself in deeper trouble than copyright infringement charges. Uttering a threat is a criminal offense and you did so with verifiable evidence (the email).
This will be my last correspondence to you via your blog. We have explained our position and we have the law on our side. The rest is up to you.
Sincerely,
Scott Agnew
Web Services Manager
CanadaEast Interactive
Am I the only one who wonders if "Scott Agnew" is legit? First, I can't see one of the Irving flacks coming on here to debate Charles and contribute to the comments section. Second, in some places, this guy's spelling and word use leaves something to be desired. I wonder if this is a set-up by someone having some fun at Charles' expense? It doesn't fit the Irving approach to this sort of stuff. Does "Scott Agnew" really work for the Irvings?
OHHHH BOY!!!!!! I received two emails from this Scott gur. Here they are -
Nice language Mr. Leblanc. Perhaps I should publish your email on CanadaEast as you seem to want to publish every correspondence we send you on your blog.
Now if you’ll excuse me, I have a lot of important work to do managing a network of news and information websites. Have a nice day sir.
Sincerely,
K. Scott Agnew
Web Services Manager
CanadaEast Interactive
P: (506) 383-2597
F: (506) 859-4904
E: scott.agnew@canadaeast.com
BTW, Mr. Leblanc, I will be in Fredericton tomorrow, Sept 12, 2007 so if you’d care to repeat the content of your earlier email to my face please advise of a meeting time and place at your convenience.
Sincerely,
K. Scott Agnew
Web Services Manager
CanadaEast Interactive
P: (506) 383-2597
F: (506) 859-4904
E: scott.agnew@canadaeast.com
The Problem I have is my email won't reach any Irving's employee.
Hey Scott? If you read this? Read again-
I have not sent you any emails!!!
But if you wish to meet with me? I have no problem with that at all!
Send me a private email at oldmaison@yahoo.com.
Tell me the place and time and I'll try to be there.
I can't reply to your email because the Irvings blocked my emails. If you have a hotmail or yahoo acount? Send it to me and I'll reply.
Merci...
K. Scott Agnew is not real then it is very disappointing. This man is a kook and his blog must be shut down. He is a danger to public safety if he is making threats.
He wants to fight you Charles !
Dont fall for it.
Your too old to fight him.
He might be a black belt or a mix martial expert or something.
Bring some back up! and a video camera.
And dont forget your asthma puffer either!
-- maurice the homeless guy --
he's listed here as the manager
http://www.canadaeast.com/onsite.php?page=contact
maurice you add some laughter to the site, how do you come up with this stuff, take 2 puffers just to be safe charles...
I think its all a setup by a big gang of Charles haters.
Charles will go to meet Scott Agnew and to his supprise there will be a big gang of Charles haters there wanting to beat him up.
But Charles will out smart them all.
Because he brought his old 10 speed bike and he will take a few puffs of his asthma puffer and escape on his old 10 speed bike.
Charles used to be known as 10 speed Charley back in the day.
They will never catch him.
STAY TUNED !!!
-- maurice the homeless guy --
The rhetoric and threats coming from Canada East and Scott Agnew are very concerning. Yes, Charles may have overstepped a few copyright laws, but who's to say that most bloggers can even identify with the word copyright, better yet, understand it.
And to be so self-righteous in thinking that most of us haven't tripped up on this rule a few times as bloggers before. Furthermore, coming out and attacking Charles like a pitbull off his leash is irresponsible to say the least. For your sake, i hope it is someone posing as you Agnew.
Let be honest, this whole ordeal speaks more to the lack of humility demonstrated by Mr. Agnew than it does Charles' inability to follow guidelines.
So you are successful in getting Charles banned from google. So what? All this does is reinforce the dictatorial nature of Canada east and those associated with it (the Irvings). Not to mention, it sets a very bad precedent, in that, if you disagree with the newspaper owner, you will be banned. The Irving organization already has a bad enough name amongst the NDP, post-secondary insitutions and conservatives, now you want to taint your brand amongst bloggers. Wow, I say go for it, but be warned, you probably will add another 500 years of disdain amongst NBers by going through with it.
I have to admit, the latest threats and tirades by Agnew make me wonder if the newspaper industry, both online and print, are starting to feel the financial pinch due to people changing the channel on them, in that, they are going elsewhere for their news and the truth. And let's be honest, if you're looking for the latter, you sure as hell aren't going to find it in the liberally dominated Irving press.
Not sure how Agnew thinks his tirade will help this matter? Carry on as you were.
If your into conspiracies why not consider that maybe Charles is not being "had" but is in fact "we" all are. Just look at the evidence...the spelling as fred says is...lets say vaguely similar to a certain blogger here....and look at the comments! For an attention starved blogger this is heaven. Why not make up a few emails to add to the pot.
The same for the above, maybe JP is just charles....maybe all the comments are. Maybe these are all written by irving.
What a quaint idea, people going elsewhere and using the internet for the truth. As long is its the truth they happen to want to hear that is. The vast majority of users don't go in search of the truth, they go in search of places that agree with what they already want to believe. There is every bit as good an argument for blogs and other on line self interest sites being less about spreading truth than the main stream media ever was.
Just Passing 7:59
Ah ya right.
Like Charles is smart enough to do that.
Why dont you just pass by and keep going untill you get lost and cant find your way back.
-- maurice the homeless guy --
I don't think this will add to irving animosity much. The only place to hear about it will be CBC and they will have to at least report the truth-that the blog was shut down by Google after numerous requests by Irving to Charles to stop infringing on their copyright.
And actually, if you do some research even bloggers take this very seriously and have no love for people who simply swipe other people's work. Google says that they usually contact people first before shutting down their account, but they also have the right to simply go in and remove the offending articles. However, they have also been known in a few cases to simply close the account without even mentioning it to the author. Which means any day we could log on to the site and it won't be there.
This isn't anything remotely like 'old germany'. This isn't charles not being allowed to speak his mind, this is charles being told not to steal from other people. If he walked into a Big Stop and stole from there and said "its my right to feed myself" nobody would give him much credence. This is exactly the same. It's very very easy to simply write an article about the Irving article and even put in some quotes. But to do this ten times in a year is something that can't be ignored. I don't agree with having an Irving monopoly, but those are two separate issues. To be too lazy not to do that won't get much sympathy from the public.
The story was about me me me so therefore I had the right to use it in my blog.
LATEST!!!!
I'm going to make Scott Agnew tomorrow in Fredericton....
Should be interesting?
TRULY STAY TUNED!!!!
can i go too?
Even if the story was bout you it still isn't your property and you are not allowed to steal it.
Your going to make Scott Agnew tomorow?
Make him what?
Your boy?
It might be a setup!
bring your 10 speed and your asthma puffer!
--maurice the homeless guy --
No, you dont have that right. If you asked for permission you would have, and you have the right to 'fair use', which means using small parts of it. I wish you'd stop saying that, because it does sound like you are crazy.
I got to stop posting or blogging late in the evenings.
Medications clicks in...lol
I'm suppose to MEET with Scott this afternoon.
Now? Maurice the homeless? You better start behaving yourself. You're getting to be a little troublemaker....
:P
Geez, I think the Irvings should reconsider their decision to turn down Charlie as one of their bloggers. Look at the excitement the guy generates!!
Vive les Acadien!!!
Charles, do yourself a favour and bring someone with you to this "meeting" with this Agnew guy. You should have a witness just in case he later decides to say that you assaulted him or something. I'm really surprised that the Irvings would allow this guy to blow on as much as he has. Wonder if "greasy, gasy & oily" know what he's up to in terms of the messages he has been sending to Charles? Maybe this is what the "new" Irving empire will look like once the brothers are gone and the Jamie Irvings take over. Scary thought. Fred.
Don't you know when someone wants to meet ya over the information highway?
You always make certain it's in a public space.
I told the guy that I would meet him at Tim's on Regent Street so we'll just take it from now?
I'll be ok...these Irving's employees might leave nasty comments but They're not that bad in person.
Truly Stay tuned.....
hes gonnu write ya a big check, and we will never see charles again, somewheres warm is all he told us when he left...
So if you only put the article up because it was about you, if they never write about you again (which seems likely), will you stop doing it?
They never covered my trial so what makes you think this will cover this one?
By the way?
I showed up at Tim but Scott Agnew never came.
Maybe it was just a big joke?
Who truly knows?
Well maurice at least your not threatening to meet me in a parking lot to talk about your big grapefuits. On the other hand if I were to take your advice and "just pass by and keep going until you get lost and cant find your way back"...wouldn't that just make me homeless like you? Surely you must have learned something from your mistakes.
(Just Passing )
errrr.....What?
What are you passing anyway? gas?
smells like it.
Anyway I cant waste my time on you,
Charles don’t like anyone talking about anything but Charles.
So go pass your gas elsewhere.
-- maurice the homeless guy --
GO TO GLOBAL NEWS, CTV AND CBC--ASAP
Poor maurice the homely guy, just keep your grapefruits in your pants, wouldn't want you to offend anyone. From what I can see all you have is wasted time you should feel right at home here.
I am so sick of the Irving paper, ragg paper lying to us and putting their spin on the facts they want us to know. The TV news and radio is also contolled. Leave the Blogg alone. We need a voice and our opinions matter too.
People are so gullible and believe the crapp written in TJ so why not let us have a say.
Charles, CanadaEast by taking you this seriously gives you credibility. They should just ignore you. By harping on this and warning you over and over they only make you fight harder. One could argue that if you take the whole paper as a work your use of one whole article per issue is only a portion and fair use but if we were to advise you we would suggest that you should be a little less lazy and only cut and paste portions of any one article and paraphrase the rest. However since your identity is tied up in being a fighter you are not likely to do this. It's a shame all round. To the commenters- Charles is Charles -yes, sometimes rude, sometimes uninformed, sometimes off the wall. But if he is taken down in our view it will be still be a shame.
I didn't remove the blog and I'm still on line!!!
Check those CanadEast articles Charles. You are still online yes but Google removed the articles.
Post a Comment