Does anyone out there has a picture of Mary Keith < Spokeperson for the Evil Irving Empire!! >
Please send it along to this blog.
I tried to locate her picture on the net but I didn't have any luck.
This morning, I was in the Cafeteria at the Legislature and there was a MLA standing beside me.
I told the MLA- Look at all these fine Irving's employees!
In front of me were three reporters from the Daily Gleaner, Moncton Transcript and Telegraph Journal!!! All Irvings newspapers!!!!
The MLA quickly replied- Ohh Charles...you know how to make a entrance!!!
Now? Mary Keith spokeperson was in the hallways of the Legislature yesterday.
This Irving robot < who never smile > was lucky that I didn't noticed her because once outside?
I would have make certain that my voice would have been heard!
I mean Racist Irving employees in the Legislature???? Hiiii Irving!!!!
This robot from the Irvings told the Irving's newspapers some very false stories about me a couple of years ago.
The scary thing is that they printed her words therefore brainwashing the readers with their BS!
I said it in the past and I will say it again- It's old Germany all over again and lets see if the Canadian Senate will down on the Irving Gestapo?
Time will tell!
Anyway? Mary Keith was surrounded by her Irving's employees in the Legislature yesterday and what a FARCE!!!
Can you imagine what would happen if an Irving reporter wrote against the Irvings?
They would be fired right on the spot! As we speak? The Irvings are training future Journalist to follow the Irving's way!!!
All this have to do is to dedicate their life and soul to the Evil Irving Empire and they will be hired on the spot!
This morning I saw Minister Keith Ashfield!
Keith is on the left!!
I shouted that he should walk around with Body Guards because the Irvings are upset with him over yesterday's decision against doubling the clear-cutting in this Province. ...lol...The Irving Gestapo will shoot him on the streets!!!..lol...
I don't believe the Irvings have hitmen on the streets because I would have been shot a long time ago!!!!...lol
Ok...I got a meeting this afternoon so therefore this is a very short update? Don't forget? Send me that picture so I can post this robot on my blog! Merci!!! Bye bye
Again, I wrote this one very fast!!!!
20 comments:
Reporters for NB newspapers are free to write anit-Irving stories, and they do so. Regularly.
Also, Irvings aren't training any future reporters. They made a donation to STU and UdeM, and those universities are using the donations as they see fit.
Charles, if you want to be treated like a reporter, don't distort the facts!
Please provide references which would lead me to the anti-Irving stories you say are being regularly written.
and regarding the Irving donations to the Journalism schools, two points on that. He who pays the piper calls the tune and wouldn't acceptance of the funding create the appearance of being compromised and shouldn't that appearance be avoided?
also I could be wrong but I believe it is an Irving Journalist running that coarce at the university??
I've seen a lot of stories critical of the LNG deal, just for example. And David Coon and the Conservation Council get regular coverage for their anti-forest-industry stuff. In fact, Janice Harvey has a regular column. And notice of the Senate hearings on media concentration. And years ago, coverage of the Irving Whale fiasco. Coverage of strikes when they happen, including of the union perspective.
Just a few examples. I'm not an Irving fan, but I am a bit of a news junkie. I find the NB papers basically pro-corporate and pro-business, but not moreso than other papers I read regularly or semi-regularly.
I don't believe the Irvings owned the papers in question when the Irving whale fiasco took place,lets see it happen now!!
Coverage of the Senate hearings???? You are nuts!!! Go have a look on the front blog of what was said and what the Irvings covered???? By the way??? I never once tried to say that I am a reporter!!! I am just a person with my personal point of views on different issues! By the way? A tent in front of the Legislature and no media coverage by the Irvings??? Come on!!! Give me a break!!!!
Nuts? Ouch! Ah well, sticks and stones...
I said one of the papers had "notice" of the Senate hearings. One of the NB papers did have notice, I remember being surprised by that.
Sorry...I'm getting touchy I guess!!! Stress?????...lol
If you think that Ashfield or Lord government will do something which would hurt Irving interest then you are hallucinating. It is just a mirage that you are seeing which Lord government does create once in a while.
Ashfield is safe and welcomed to spend time at Irving summer cottage as others have done before as long as he is Minister of Natural Resources or in the cabinet.
One more thing...The Irvings control the Workers Compensation Board, the Bureaucrtas and those racists members of the New Brunswick Human Rights Commission that gave the ok to the Irvings that Minorities can be hunt down like the old days! Thank God that the Human Rights Commission wasn't around 70 years ago because all and frogs would be hung by the trees!!!!
Leave Mary Keith alone. She does her job and she does it very well.
Something extraordinary happened today. Lord got up in the legislature answered questions and did not mention 1980’s and 1990’s. That is a major breakthrough that this fellow may grow up. Nay, not a chance. He is God damn too immature.
so let's see if I have this right, "anti-Irving" is the same thing as covering a story involving the Irving interests without a pro Irving bias, and Janice Harvey is the counterweight to the editorial perspective of the family owned paper, that sounds like things are operating as they should be. The T.J would have looked pretty foolish if it had ignored the LNG tax fiasco so I don't know whether that's a ringing endorsement of the editorial integrity of the Telegraph-Journal...Look at the big picture, what about coverage of the debate over Jaako-Poyry, why is the environmental viewpoint very often represented by a front page picture of some granola-ish kid with a tree painted on their face hold a placard
saying "save the trees" or are granola-ish kids the only people concerned about the environment? It seems to me that this is blatant and deliberate marginalization of opponents of the industrial forestry espoused by many corporations including the Irvings...In other words, folks don't pay any attention to those people who want to save the trees, they're just misguided hippies, tree huggers...look at Carl Davies' article on the front page of the T.J yesterday the way he established the context of the article about the wait for the government's response to the select committee on wood supply,..."Forest Industry in a death spiral..." or something similar...The Irving's get their slant in and employees are aware that if they bite the hand that feeds them they won't be fed for very much longer. I don't think many people believe the Irvings shouldn't use their papers to promote their views and interests but it would be refreshing to see the Irving papers use the same journalistic rigour investigating stories involving the Irvings as it does investigating other issues...for instance Robert Jones of CBC T.V did a terrific story about how Irving Oil was doing some creative billing of it's furnace oil customers..overcharging them basically..where was the Irving paper follow up on that story?! It would seem to me that if Irving newspaper employees were editorially untethered, then a story about citizens of Saint John being overcharged for their home heating oil would have been worth some kind of play...or maybe the T.J did a hard hitting follow and I missed it, if I have my apologies in advance..Prosecution rests!
I remember on one occasion during the summer of 2002. I noticed protesters in front of the Legislature. They were all Irving employees. There were anti-Irving signs all over the place. I told some people- I wonder how the Daily Gleaner going to handle this story? The next day they had a picture of a young child saying- Daddy wants a job!!! Not one single anti-Irving sign around. Once again, the prosecution rest its case!!!!...lol....As for leaving Mary Keith alone? No way will I ever leave those racists employees alone!!!
I heard on the radio one morning that there was a major drug seige on an Irving ship. I think it was millions of dollars worth of cocaine if my memory serves me well. I am still waiting for the story on the TJ and I will be waiting a very long time for it also. I am sure if it wouldn't of been on an Irving ship we would of got all of the scoop but we didn't did we. As far as Mary Keith is concerned, I think that she does exactly what the Irvings want her to do, be stern looking, and fill peoples heads with her BS defending the Irving's for all the wrongs that they do. I hope that they pay her well because I would rather be human being instead of an Irving Robot anyday no matter what the pay is
I was told the same story by someone yesterday. We never heard anymore on the Cocaine that was on the Irving ship!!! I wonder why??? We need more independent news media to investigate issues like this one!!!
Just to clarify a point, the St Thomas Journalism program is run by a FORMER Telegraph Journal editor in chief who has nothing to do with the TJ anymore.
The money the irving's gave goes to bring in guest speakers and lecturers, not to have the reporters trained to serve the "empire".
My views to that lat comment is -HOGWASH!!!! If you don't believe that these reporters are being brain wash by the Irvings? You are truly living in another world!!!
Hi Blogger,
I've seen this post before but important things are always worth reminding. After all, repetition is the mother of learning.
Hi Blogger,
Thanks for the post, looking forward to more great stuff.
Post a Comment