The following was in August 29, 2005 editorial of Telegraph. Is that not double-faced? LNG is great for Saint John but bad for the health of St. Andrews' folks. What about the health of people in Saint John? Telegraph Journal editorial: quotes: "Irving Oil might benefit if the Maine LNG projects fall through, but Premier Lord is not acting as the company's advocate. He's opposed to the Passamaquoddy Bay projects because they would be located on waters this province shares with Maine, and that worries New Brunswick residents"
"LNG tankers would disrupt Canadian businesses based on tourism, fisheries and aquaculture."
"The residents of St. Andrews and other communities fear the LNG projects on Passamaquoddy Bay would threaten their health, property, and way of life."
2 comments:
At least he used parliamentary language and did not say pain in the butt or pain in the as*.
The following was in August 29, 2005 editorial of Telegraph. Is that not double-faced? LNG is great for Saint John but bad for the health of St. Andrews' folks. What about the health of people in Saint John?
Telegraph Journal editorial:
quotes:
"Irving Oil might benefit if the Maine LNG projects fall through, but Premier Lord is not acting as the company's advocate. He's opposed to the Passamaquoddy Bay projects because they would be located on waters this province shares with Maine, and that worries New Brunswick residents"
"LNG tankers would disrupt Canadian businesses based on tourism, fisheries and aquaculture."
"The residents of St. Andrews and other communities fear the LNG projects on Passamaquoddy Bay would threaten their health, property, and way of life."
Post a Comment