Monday, November 07, 2005

THE IRVINGS AND ROGERS TELEVISION WILL STEP UP TO THE PLATE FOR BERNARD LORD!!!!!

LIR marriage

20 comments:

Anonymous said...

I would suspect any big business (over 100 employees) would always support the gov't party especially a conservative gov't.

Anonymous said...

There seems to be a love triangle.

Anonymous said...

Big business does support governments but our government is also sell-out to big business. We the public are screwed.

Anonymous said...

Tim I have been reading a lot of your posts and comments and I have no other choice but to agree with you.
Mr.lord does seem to favor exploitation to it's fullest, including: the Poor,the Volnerable,the Weak, the Unemployed,the disabled,the seniors, I don't think I have to go any further to make my point.
If your not a corperate giant in New Brunswick you are up for grabs.

Anonymous said...

I'm sorry I didn't clarify the straw that broke the camel's back to come to my conclusion on the above comment.
It was his statement on how he felt about gaming and gambling in the Teleghaph Journal.
After all you have tried to do to bring awareness to the issue of vlts including putting your very life on the line (twice) to save someone else if that was not enough to persuade this government that proper responsible regulations are long overdue combined with how he himself said he feels about this issue then I don't know what will be.
good luck and please stay with it!

Anonymous said...

I went out today as I knew Mr.Lord would be making an appearance in Saint John on Charlotte Street for the opening of Mrs.Weir's office.

So I took advantage of the media to remind Mr.Lord that the only reason he created Mrs.Weir's Job Tittle was to move her out of the way so he can try and steal the poor peoples votes and that was the ONLY reason.

The Irving flyer is being by-est toward this by-election and will not give the Liberal party their just due as far as information reaching the people goes so any opportunity is a golden opportunity as far as getting the message out there.

But I just want to make this perfectly clear.

I went on my own as I knew the LNG group was going to be there so therefore cameras would be also ,of which I took advantage of.

I am in no way nor is the Liberal Party associated with the LNG group.

The main reason I am explaining this is because the Hooton's office is directly across the street from the new office of Mrs.Weir and I know for a fact the CON-servative party will try to connect me with the LNG group as they were making bogus calls as soon as I arrived.

But again we MUST take advantage of the press and or Media...Thank-you

Anonymous said...

If tim would go out and look for a job instead of following politicians maybe we might not have to support him. welfare is for people that cant find work because of mental or physical conditions.
If tim smith would look at the classified adds he might relies that there are jobs there.

Anonymous said...

Charles: Once upon a time you were all for Rogers (calling in to every show)...what is wrong with Rogers giving someone else an opportunity to express an opinion? It would appear as if you have had ample opportunity.

Anonymous said...

So Irving dude in the middle has two suiters, both Bernard Lord and Rogers They are both ready for metrimony. Is the dude going to choose one or have two brides? It is going to be one big happy family. We the rest are the peasants and servants.

Anonymous said...

I was looking at the picture on the top of the page, Maurice. Big business and government get together to screw the general public.

Anonymous said...

Nice Liberal shirt you were wearing on the news tonight Tim. At least we all know who's side you're on.

Anonymous said...

Thank you but that was never a secret.
I threw my support their way when I was in Fredericton in May and I've had some great conversations with quite a few mlas since then and also a couple of chats with Mr.Graham.

I also attended the biennal meeting of the Liberal party last month in Fredericton and had a great time and met some interesting people who were willing to listen to some ideas I've been working on involving responsible regulation for VLTs.
Again thanks.

Blogger Charles LeBlanc said...

I was going to delete the attack on Tim but I won't. Yes, he's on welfare and he's a good father. Why always lower yourself to the personal attack? He could do like the poor people and stay silent but he refuses to do so. What's wrong with that? Come on? Lets be nice and debate the issue.

Merci!!!!

Anonymous said...

If you deleted the attached Charles :

" If tim would go out and look for a job instead of following politicians maybe we might not have to support him. welfare is for people that cant find work because of mental or physical conditions.
If tim smith would look at the classified adds he might relies that there are jobs there. "

Then I would see nothing different abut your Blog Site and the Irving Media Press you talk about.

And what about this question Charles, and I'm not asking this to be mean.

" Anonymous said...
Charles: Once upon a time you were all for Rogers (calling in to every show)...what is wrong with Rogers giving someone else an opportunity to express an opinion? It would appear as if you have had ample opportunity.

5:26 PM

Blogger Charles LeBlanc said...

What is there to delete??? This is Canada...a free democracy. I'm not saying that Charles LeBlanc should go on the air all the time. If Charles is the first one to call and he acts like an idiot? Sorry..cut him off! This has never happen. From what I'm told? Someone from the Bernard Lord office made a complaint to Voice of the Province. These people at Rogers Television are run by people from Ontario and should be put to a stop! The Irvings and Rogers Television are working hand in hand trying to brainwash the public. Yes, it is old Germany all over again. That kid Rich Crosby got orders from the Irvings? Did he accept a bride???? You tell me?????

Anonymous said...

5:21 the reasons why Mr. Smith is on assistance could be too numerous to debate.

As a matter of fact this type of comment is a very narrow question as some people in their 40s or older have probably been productive most of their lives as we have no info on his previous dispositions.

The information I've read in the newspaper and this blog on just his case as I know it, he is a single parent raising his daughter for the past 8 years while suffering from a gambling addiction but also up until 2 years ago has held a well paying long time job.

He chose to try fixing that by standing up to his Government to raise awareness to this addiction and to help others in that process.

I can't imagine the enormous amount of courage it took for him to expose this to the province and the whole country.

To this day I see he is still active to help on vlt addiction, which means he must be trying to re-enter into society and come out of his shell and face his realities as well as his demons.

On that note how do we know what else he is working on toward a better future for himself and his family?

The bottom line here is for those who have fallen victim to the temptations of society be it drugs, alcohol, gambling, abuse of many kinds and so forth but eventually gain the courage to rise above it only to be condemned in that delicate process does more harm then good.

And for us the public to have no details what so ever on these individuals and yet condemn them at the stroke of a keyboard without putting a single thought forward on encouraging what their trying to do to help themselves or others is a far worst thing then them being on temporary assistance.

Blogger Charles LeBlanc said...

to Donald H.M.Fred.....VERY VERY VEY WELL SAID!!!!! MERCI BEAUCOUP!!!!

Anonymous said...

It is an insult to our Jewish community to refer to anything going on here as"Old Germany".Your ignorance of the facts is apalling.

Blogger Charles LeBlanc said...

No one here spoked against the Jewish population. I'm talking about freedom of speech!! You kow that anyway!!!

Spinks said...

9:29, haven't you heard? Everyone's a racist and everything said can hurt someone's feelings. Yeah I'm saying that tounge in cheek but this just proves how ridiculous things can get. Charles didn't slander Jews at all. Either someone is super-sensitive or saw a small window of opportunity to try to make something out of nothing or a little bit of both.