Stephen harper 'NEVER SAID' he would use the notwithstanding clause,PM paul martin 'DID SAY HE WOULD USE IT'. get your fear & smears right will ya. ___________________________________
nobody is buying this fear & smear BS anymore ARTIST WCIE.
the best the 'LIBRANOS' can come up with this election is their 'BROKEN RECORD' from the last election of attack ad's with 'SOCALLED' quotes taken from 'OVER THIRTEEN YEARS AGO' taken 'COMPLETELY OUT OF CONTEXT'.
for me its a very easy choice,choose a party whos 'STOLEN MILLIONS' from me to give to quebec 'OR' vote for one person in a party who 'MIGHT OF SAID SOME STUPID THINGS OVER THIRTEEN YEARS AGO TAKEN COMPLETELY OUT OF CONTEXT & POINTED OUT BY A CORRUPT PARTY'...
I'll take my chances with 'REPLACING' a corrupt party whos been in power since >>>'1993'<<<,whos stolen 'MILLINOS' from me to give to quebec,whos lead by a quebecer 'FOREVER',whos under investigation by the 'RCMP',who puts out 'MISLEADING' attack ads that attack our proud canadian forces,ETC,ETC,ETC..............
anyone who votes for that 'NEEDS SERIOUS HELP'! LOL !.
Everybody is entitled to their personal opinion, even Nimrods like yourself.
I think that's why Charles erected this site, so people could exchange Ideas and various opinions.
Since when does expressing one's opinion or Viewpoint become Spamming on a Public Blog Open Forum, " only when somebody eles opinion varies from Yours."
Charles is far more tolerant than myself, because I would block your IP Address from even being allowed to come on this site, let alone Voice Your Self Indulgent fooish Ranting And Raving.
Get a Life Nimrod 5:17
And I don't hide behind the Anonymous Monicker like your Scared Wimpy Little Self.
We all have freedom of speech, it's just I think your wrong and a fool. So how do you like me Now :>)
To keep the Notwithstanding clause means that anyone that has a social need may not be protected by the Charter of Human Rights & Freedoms. It means the Government can over-rule any court decision as it deems necessary. This is very...very...very....disturbing. The Liberals want to get rid of it...meaning those that are poor...homeless...disabled, etc will have protection under the Charter. It is very clear the Conservatives do not respect the Charter. And t hose of us who need the Charter are nervous. Paul Martin may be questionable....but Stephen Harper is the "devil in disguise".
Mrs. Karr you have all the freedom you want but you are putting the same nonsense under every blog. Verbatim. That is what is spam. If you want to be a broken record that "Harper is great" then that is your problem. However vast majority of Canadians know he is an idiot. He may win by 35% of votes and not even 50% and that is does not make him a hero. Just that he is good at fooling people and hiding his real self--disgustingly right-winger.
I've never figured out this holy grail of the Charter. While it sounds good in theory, it's also caused lots of problems and undoubtedley will lead to more. How many criminals and I mean guilty as sin criminals have gotten off because of some Charter loophole. Lots...and their victims are the ones who suffer. Apparently those who hide behind the Charter for everything don't care about that little fact.
Spinks are you an authority on constitution? Are you saying Charter protects criminals? What is wrong with you? It protects everybody. Does that mean all Canadians are criminal? Wow. We will call it new philosophy: Harpism. Keep on harping, Spinks.
Yep, the Charter has protected lots of criminals as they get off on little technicalities that some layer who knows their client is guilty uses. Then they strike some other victim. The Charter is not the perfect document Paul Martin would have the country believe. Getting rid of the not-withstanding clause is giving a green light to activist judges to do what they want. Parliament with elected by the people MP's makes the laws, not appointed judges UNLESS Paul Martin has his way...again.
First tell me about a document which is perfect and prepared by humans. Charter is one of the best in the world if not the best.
It is politicians who screw around. When it comes to rights I rather depend on judges as they do not have to worry about elections. Please do not call judges crooks as they only interpret the law and if politicians continue to screw the law there is nothing judges can do.
You need to inform yourself a little more when it comes to rights and politicians vs judges. Politicians by very nature are biased and jugdes are not to the same extent unless someone is totally incompetent.
I called some judges activists, not crooks. The Charter's not bad but it has flaws when guilty as sin criminals get away with their crimes and the victin suffers. It has tied the hands of police in some instances and that's too bad. I just don't think it's the holy grail Paul Martin makes it out to be, that is all.
When it comes to rights I rather depend on judges. Politicians are crooks and Nothwithstanding clause is dangerous in their hands. On that one I agree with Martin.
12 comments:
Got it. Now I know why he wants nothwithstandin clause - so that he can screw the public.
Stephen harper 'NEVER SAID' he would use the notwithstanding clause,PM paul martin 'DID SAY HE WOULD USE IT'. get your fear & smears right will ya.
___________________________________
nobody is buying this fear & smear BS anymore ARTIST WCIE.
the best the 'LIBRANOS' can come up with this election is their 'BROKEN RECORD' from the last election of attack ad's with 'SOCALLED' quotes taken from 'OVER THIRTEEN YEARS AGO' taken 'COMPLETELY OUT OF CONTEXT'.
for me its a very easy choice,choose a party whos 'STOLEN MILLIONS' from me to give to quebec 'OR' vote for one person in a party who 'MIGHT OF SAID SOME STUPID THINGS OVER THIRTEEN YEARS AGO TAKEN COMPLETELY OUT OF CONTEXT & POINTED OUT BY A CORRUPT PARTY'...
hmm 'MILLION'(libranos)...'WORDS'(harper)... hmmmm.
I'll take my chances with 'REPLACING' a corrupt party whos been in power since >>>'1993'<<<,whos stolen 'MILLINOS' from me to give to quebec,whos lead by a quebecer 'FOREVER',whos under investigation by the 'RCMP',who puts out 'MISLEADING' attack ads that attack our proud canadian forces,ETC,ETC,ETC..............
anyone who votes for that 'NEEDS SERIOUS HELP'! LOL !.
TY.
4:27 Why are you spaming? If you are selling Harper then through spaming you're having opposite effect.
5:17 PM
Everybody is entitled to their personal opinion, even Nimrods like yourself.
I think that's why Charles erected this site, so people could exchange Ideas and various opinions.
Since when does expressing one's opinion or Viewpoint become Spamming on a Public Blog Open Forum, " only when somebody eles opinion varies from Yours."
Charles is far more tolerant than myself, because I would block your IP Address from even being allowed to come on this site, let alone Voice Your Self Indulgent fooish Ranting And Raving.
Get a Life Nimrod 5:17
And I don't hide behind the Anonymous Monicker like your Scared Wimpy Little Self.
We all have freedom of speech, it's just I think your wrong and a fool. So how do you like me Now :>)
To keep the Notwithstanding clause means that anyone that has a social need may not be protected by the Charter of Human Rights & Freedoms. It means the Government can over-rule any court decision as it deems necessary. This is very...very...very....disturbing. The Liberals want to get rid of it...meaning those that are poor...homeless...disabled, etc will have protection under the Charter.
It is very clear the Conservatives do not respect the Charter. And t hose of us who need the Charter are nervous. Paul Martin may be questionable....but Stephen Harper is the "devil in disguise".
Mrs. Karr you have all the freedom you want but you are putting the same nonsense under every blog. Verbatim. That is what is spam. If you want to be a broken record that "Harper is great" then that is your problem. However vast majority of Canadians know he is an idiot. He may win by 35% of votes and not even 50% and that is does not make him a hero. Just that he is good at fooling people and hiding his real self--disgustingly right-winger.
I've never figured out this holy grail of the Charter. While it sounds good in theory, it's also caused lots of problems and undoubtedley will lead to more. How many criminals and I mean guilty as sin criminals have gotten off because of some Charter loophole. Lots...and their victims are the ones who suffer. Apparently those who hide behind the Charter for everything don't care about that little fact.
Spinks are you an authority on constitution? Are you saying Charter protects criminals? What is wrong with you? It protects everybody. Does that mean all Canadians are criminal? Wow. We will call it new philosophy: Harpism. Keep on harping, Spinks.
Yep, the Charter has protected lots of criminals as they get off on little technicalities that some layer who knows their client is guilty uses. Then they strike some other victim. The Charter is not the perfect document Paul Martin would have the country believe. Getting rid of the not-withstanding clause is giving a green light to activist judges to do what they want. Parliament with elected by the people MP's makes the laws, not appointed judges UNLESS Paul Martin has his way...again.
Spinks..
First tell me about a document which is perfect and prepared by humans. Charter is one of the best in the world if not the best.
It is politicians who screw around. When it comes to rights I rather depend on judges as they do not have to worry about elections. Please do not call judges crooks as they only interpret the law and if politicians continue to screw the law there is nothing judges can do.
You need to inform yourself a little more when it comes to rights and politicians vs judges. Politicians by very nature are biased and jugdes are not to the same extent unless someone is totally incompetent.
I called some judges activists, not crooks. The Charter's not bad but it has flaws when guilty as sin criminals get away with their crimes and the victin suffers. It has tied the hands of police in some instances and that's too bad. I just don't think it's the holy grail Paul Martin makes it out to be, that is all.
When it comes to rights I rather depend on judges. Politicians are crooks and Nothwithstanding clause is dangerous in their hands. On that one I agree with Martin.
Post a Comment