Since Kelly Lamrock told the media that most of our elected officials will agree that I should be banned for life from the New Brunswick Legislature?
I believe that it’s my turn to give my view on Kelly Lamrock.
During my six months protest in front of the Legislature, I met a lot of Liberal Mla’s but Kelly Lamrock never came to see me.
It took a long time for me to get to know Kelly Lamrock.< Months after the protest >
I was told that he was very smart and thinks a lot. 
He’s a lawyer so therefore this would put him way up there compare to the so call average New Brunswickers.
Sorry but that’s wrong?!
The Irvings, lawyers, priests or to the blue collar workers. Everyone must be treated equally.
Then suddenly from nowhere?
Kelly Lamrock began to gather a lot of attention from New Brunswickers. 
Many would say that he’s the next leader of the Liberal Party.
On a few occasions, he got my attention and I congratulated him for it.
He’s a good speaker.
Behind the scenes the members from the P.C. Party were calling the Liberals - The Kelly Party.
There’s a few from the liberal Party who said - Kelly is way up there but if he went down to the level of the poor New Brunswicker?
He wouldn’t survive 24 hours. He would be dead!
Kelly Lamrock has shown his true colors when he voted that I should be banned from the Legislature for life.
Let me be very clear on one issue.
Kelly Lamrock will never be the leader of the Liberal Party. I would be there up front there on the front line telling the Liberal Party what Kelly Lamrock is all about.
We don’t need a individual who believes that only the so-call smart people should be allowed to be in the Legislature.
If Kelly Lamrock was in my riding? I would put my name in the ring as an independent to attract some votes away from this lawyer.
A MLA from the opposition side who believes that certain New Brunswickers should be banned in a democratic system?
There’s something very wrong here.
If Kelly Lamrock has that kind of attitude as a MLA while in the opposition?
Can you just imagine his attitude as a Minister? 
Very scary taught indeed.
Thursday, June 22, 2006
KELLY LAMROCK SHOULD NEVER BE RE-ELECTED OR THE NEW LEADER OF THE LIBERAL PARTY!!!!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
17 comments:
As usual you are wrong attacking one person. There are 5 conservatives and 3 Liberals on that committee who voted to bar you from the legislature. For a change take some blame. First it was Irvings, then Human Rights Commission, then the Quebec staff at the legislature and on and on and now Kelly Lamrock. It looks whole world is against you. You are paranoid.
They're next on my list...stay tune....
At least Kelly has the testicular fortitude to admit that he thinks you should be banned. Where's Tanker in all this? Not to mention I have heard nothing from Graham about this either. Admit it Charles, you gambled and lost.
Charlie, you heart is in the right place but a wize man once said to me: "Everytime you are pointing a finger at someone, you have four pointing back at you!".
For everything you beleive the Irvings do badly, they also invest millions of dollars every year in our Universities, R&D, local communities, sports and the environment. How are they different from companies like GE, Kraft, GM, Ford, etc?
Did you even read the ban notice given to you? Seriously, did you?
It does NOT say you are banned "for life" as you have called it about 20 times this week. It says INDEFINITELY. There's a big difference, but as usual, you twist things to garner more attention for yourself.
They don't own all the newspapers in their State!
They also don't cut down all the trees, and most importantly, don't have the politicians in their back pocket. The difference is that if Kraft owned as many companies, newspapers, politicians, gas terminals, docks, ships, etc.,etc., we'd be talking about them. But they aren't the Irvings and have no presence here, so it's pointless to discuss them.
I hardly think its 'paranoia' when somebody has been barred from the legislature and arrested for taking pictures. Charles is often out of line, but that comment is just unbelievably stupid.
Kelly Lamrock was a born politician, he only went to law school because he figured its a good way to get into politics. Even at Saint Thomas he was a politician. He's a fatheaded idiot of the worst kind-the kind that thinks because they've read Plato they understand the world better than every who hasn't.
Unfortunately Charles, going against these liberals in their ridings means going for the tories. It's hard to have it both ways.
It's gotta be hard as a public figure like Charles-what's left after both the liberals and the tories have screwed you over? I say run as an independant in your hometown of Memramcook as an independant. It's a small riding, and it would be absolutely hysterical to see what would happen!
Could you imagine? Only in New Brunswick would a riding elect a Member of the Legislature only to find that they are legally barred from entering the building! Priceless!
I will never run for political office but I will admit that it would be interesting.
I feel bad that the Liberals have joined up with Bernard Lord on this one but what can a person do?
Just take it day by day and blog away!
...and bloggling I shall do.....
Lamrock is a good guy. At least he's in good company: Charles has developed a loooon list of enemies.
Charles: this particular blog comes off as very childish. Maybe it just seems that way to me because I don't care for Lord and I like Lamrock, but I'm just saying.
And by the way, you don't have to live in a riding to run there. If you want to back up your words, you can absolutely run against Lamrock.
Poor Charles, you just don't understand! The members of the Legislative Assembly of New Brunswick are elected by the PEOPLE, and do the peoples' bidding. That means that when you were banned INDEFINITELY, the people of New Brunswick voted to have that ban delivered to you. The few disciples that agree with your stance are the minority, so get over it and get on with your life.
Oh please all major corporations own shares in the media. GE owned NBC, Disney owns ABC and so on... I agree that they have a monopoly on our media in NB, but that's a different story.
How does barring Charles from the legislature help the Irvings? It doesn't. Secondly, don't the employees at the legislature have the right to a safe work environment and has their employer, isn't the NB govt obligated to take the neccessary measure to make sure that employee needs are met.
What a stupid and idiotic suggestion that he should run as an independent in Memramcook.
Yes he should run independent. After antagonizing everybody in the riding only vote he will get is his own, if he remembers to vote that is. That will be hilarious and first in election history.
That's the most retarded comment I've ever heard. If you think that the MLA's are 'doing your bidding' you are just an idiotic. In more than half of the ridings in New Brunswick the person who 'represents' the riding wasn't even voted for by the majority of people in the riding. And that's even with the NDP getting only 10% of the votes in the province.
Even on house votes the government only holds 28 seats. That's a majority of ONE. That means the other 27 ridings have ZERO power to effect legislation.
If you think that of the dozens of bills passed and hundreds of decisions made by politicians that that reflects the will of the voters then you are so brainwashed there really is no help.
In this case it wasn't even MLA's, it was a committee of only five people who held a secret meeting and won't even say what evidence they base their decision on. This is a secret court if I even heard of one.
It is a VERY serious thing to bar a citizen from a legislative building. Because it involves such a violent reduction in a citizens rights, then all evidence should be public and meetings should be held in public. More importantly, it should NOT be those who are the target of the press who should be making the decisions, but an independant body.
So whether people 'like' Kelly Lamrock is irrelevant. This is a secret trial with secret evidence and a government which holds the people in contempt.
The only real benefit of this is that it shows the liberals true colours as well and people can see they are no different from the tories. They are elitists snobs who don't want to be held up to ridicule and the truth.
However, I would suggest that at least a quarter of what is wrong in politics is that people refuse to get involved. They refuse to grow up and be accountable and responsible and instead like to have the government there to blame when things go wrong. This is perfectly exemplified in Charles stating that he "will never run for office".
Imagine a place where the most important decisions are made that affect everybody's life, and instead of people saying "let's get together and change this", they are saying "there's no way I'm getting involved in politics". The boarding house issue was put forth not by this blog, but during an important by-election in an impoverished riding. In other words, it was within the political arena that change was made, not by shouting outside the walls.
That's bullshit that Charles would get no votes. Even on his own with no platform he'd get votes. His enemies sit in the Legislature, and in case you haven't read many blogs lately, those people are the enemy of more people than Charles. They are the enemies of the people of Saint John, Belledune, all of northern New Brunswick, the acadian peninsula, the fundy region, women, natives, and the environment.
But if people refuse to get involved with politics, then they get the government they deserve-and all the blogging in the world won't help you.
With the excpetion of the comment above mine (which was somewhat reasonable). Who the fuck are you people? It's bloody well obvious you're a bunch of Lamrock cronies looking to ride his jock hard enough to get a job in the civil service.
Only a new slate of NDP MLAs are going to change things. Liberals and Conservatives have lost the respect and confidence of the people. Lamrock should switch back to the NDP, the opportuist. Hey Kelly maybe you should start chasing ambulances again before people vote you out of the job!
With the excpetion of the comment above mine (which was somewhat reasonable). Who the ???? are you people?
It's bloody well obvious you're a bunch of Lamrock cronies looking to ride his jock hard enough to get a job in the civil service.
Only a new slate of NDP MLAs are going to change things. Liberals and Conservatives have lost the respect and confidence of the people.
Lamrock should switch back to the NDP, the opportuist. Hey Kelly maybe you should start chasing ambulances again before people vote you out of the job!
Unfortunately, a new slate of NDP's in the House is expected, ohhhhhh, right around when hell freezes over.
Unbelieveable that they have so many important things to do and the taxpayers have had little respect since they have been there.
Yes we should be disappointed in all of them to vote to ban Charles. This is not democratic but a dictatorship with an "Irving twist". Irving Ragg doesnot enjoy the blog because they want us all to be controlled. Too bad this is so sickening because it would be funny.
For those that don't agree with Charles making the assumption that he is banned for life from the leg rather than indefinately.. Think about this - How many people have been banned from the leg and how many bans have been recinded - None. So I completely agree with Charles as history speaks for itself.
Post a Comment