Thursday, July 20, 2006

PRO CHOICE FIGHTS BACK IN FREDERICTON!!!


1, originally uploaded by Oldmaison.

Pictures of today's pro-choice action; in response to Ontario anti-choice demonstrations yesterday.

Pictures of today's pro-choice action; in response to Ontario anti-choice demonstrations yesterday.

I wasn't there so maybe someone can leave a detail account what happen?

4
2
prochoice

10 comments:

Spinks said...

Equally in bad taste. These folks actually had an opportunity here. I'm pleased to see they blew it and couldn't resist sinking low.

Anonymous said...

Equally bad taste? WHere? I saw no giant posters of anything. There is one girl with red paint down her leg and that's not very graphic at all. The rest are all just placards. So how exactly would they combat it? They'd win your respect if they didn't do anything? Hypocrite.

It's interesting that Charles wasnt there, we know his views as well. Notice how its usually men who are shooting off at the keyboards, and they won't even look at the blood on their hands from their evening meal. Obviously life means nothing to you preachers who only want the world to revolve around your deluded and ancient ideologies. You are hypocrites and its right that these women should be combating your tyranny. Patriarchal societies must end. Men have no right to be judge and jury.

When you are paying to raise those children, when you are sponsoring women on welfare then come talk to us. We never even heard a peep when Charles featured that woman who was being evicted.

As was said to CHarles-either put up or shut up. Worry about your own body, you're the only one that cares about it.

Blogger Charles LeBlanc said...

I will come to my defence. I wasn't there because I was in the middle of my blog about the protest in the morning.

I downloaded 100 pictures that hot afternoon.


Trust me, I would have been there. I'm all over the place.

I found out that this issue is a very touchy one. I had some people upset with me because I covered the protest in front of the Abortion clinic.

Yes, I put my views in that blog and my views on abortion change 30 years ago in Memramcook.

One young girl became pregnant after a one night stand and this was a big faux pas in the Valley.

She wanted to commit suicide or have an abortion.

Once she came from the hospital. I held that little baby in my hands and said- If you would have taken an Abortion? This pride of joy wouldn't be here.

It was at that momment that my attitude change.

Today Mathieu is a fine young man!!

If anyone who wants to get upset with me with my views in this blog?

I'm going to have the whole world against me.

That's the life of a ADHD blogger I guess!!!!

Anonymous said...

Anti-choice forget something. You rather have a child who drank from a toilet bowl and no one cared for him and died in that manner.

Unfortunately anti-choice are the same people who do not believe in welfare or assistance to poor. In other words let the people be born, let them suffer so that these snug people can feel great about themselves by looking down on the poor and their sufferings. Or may be they need servants to cater to all their needs.

I am a man I do believe that women should make the choice and men must not dictate.

Spinks said...

Killing a baby is wrong. It is as simple as that. All the other issues are secondary when it comes to killing someone. Sadly the baby is almost always forgotten in this debate.

Anonymous said...

Spinks,

However once the baby is born then it is ok to shoot them as your friend Bush is doing in Iraq or Israelis are doing in Lebanon and Gaza. Why are you not speaking up there?

Anonymous said...

It is not a baby, it is a fetus, its as simple as that. Anybody who says its a baby doesnt know squat. Killing is wrong, but it happens, people dont want to look at the murders they commit every day just for a meal, but they can rant on and on about things that have no impact on them and that they are not involved in. No surprise that the preachers are usually ones who dont bother helping the poor or animals. They just drone on and on so they can feel smug and superior in their perceived righteousness.

So what if that fine young man werent around. That argument went out with the stone ages because every time you use a condom or are a woman who isnt pregnant you are denying a life. Its ludicrous, and it is population of north america that inflicts poverty, slavery, and misery on the rest of the world.

Yet we dont hear anything about our countrys participation in forced birth control in developing countries or things like that. People just like to pick on scared young girls because they are sick. They dont deserve to be listened to and have no right to preach. If there are any teens reading this, feel free to tell Charles or anybody else to "go to ^%$$" if they preach to you.

Spinks said...

Well, now we're seeing the differences. If a person thinks it's just a fetus (piece of inanimate tissue), of course who cares and I totally understand where you're coming from. However, put yourself in the shoes of someone who views it as a baby? Why would they not think it's morally wrong?

11:48, man, what does that have to do with abortion? I'm happy to address the issue at hand but don't cloud it. That's another blog.

Anonymous said...

Spinks, there is a relation that very people who are anti-choice are also pro-owning guns and pro-war. Look at Bush. He will not allow stem cell research yet it is ok for him to kill ten of thousands of children in Iraq. Hypocrisy at its worst.

Anonymous said...

Who says a fetus is "inanimate tissue"? Why are you lying? Has anybody EVER said that? All that was said is that your skin isn't even inanimate tissue. How much thought do you give to your skin?

Call it a baby, call it a stork if you want. The reality is that it has zero awareness of the outside world. Far less than the animal you just had for supper, far less than that roadkill you drove past. A plant has about as much awareness as a fetus.

To call a fetus the same as a born child is completely misleading, which is why there is a cutoff point after which abortions are not done. You can call it an astronaut if you want to, it doesn't change the fact of what it is-a fetus. Far worse things are done just to provide you with too much protein and fat in your diet, but I suppose its far easier to look past the stick in your eye and cast the first stone elsewhere.

Perhaps that's why so many people are so judgemental of others and issues which they play little part-it enables them to not have to change their own behaviour.