Wednesday, November 15, 2006

Are those guys true reporters???


Pictures 101
Originally uploaded by Oldmaison.

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Charles, is your ADD so bad that you can't even post more than headlines? If so you should look into ritalin! Even a blogger actually has a BLOG, not just a headline and picture. What the hell is that story supposed to be about? Where was the picture taken? What time was it? Who is being interviewed? What is going on?

Blogger Charles LeBlanc said...

Sometime I just don't feel like writing so I just blog a picture and let the debate begin...

Anonymous said...

I am inclined to agree with the first comment...

I understand you want a headline to start a debate, but when the headline is so vague and without any information, how do you expect a debate, especially an educated debate, to begin?

Anonymous said...

These reporters just want to know all you have to say and then they report a soin of their own. This way of reporting is the way it goes. Does Irving have some say ? I certainly think so because very little is in the news; this should brought out in the open but only when they want to bring their spin!

Anonymous said...

Why would they not be "true reporters"?

Anonymous said...

Rogers (a company that makes billions of dollars each year across the nation) are puppets for irving (a group of companies that are worth about what Rogers makes in a year)?

How so? Because they have similar opinions. All large businesses are pro-large business. And all news radio is pro-getting listeners for advertisers.

Anonymous said...

I DON'T THINK THIS IS A TRUE JOURNALIST.

I THINK IRVINGS AND ROGERS ARE IN BED TOGETHER.

Anonymous said...

I think he's HAAWWT!