a What Rights do I have,To move on with Life After June 3 2005 OF THE NEW BRUNSWICK HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION DAY ON January 24 the ELIMINATION OF THE NEW BRUNSWICK HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION DAY ON JANUARY 24TH!!!http://oldmaison.blogspot.com/ the fact is that I can"t move a way from New Brunswick unless I give up on these law suit RE:F/C/187/o4, The Court Of Appeal of NB. Re::File 100/05 ; Look at Letter of September 28/06 , Received and filed on September 29/2006 "Delivered by hand ATTENTION: MICHAEL BRAY,Q.C REGISTRAR. Sir, I am not a lawyer and do not Know what a status Report (form 62,J ) IS,however ,these are the facts of my CASE to the best of my ability:-(1) (1) I have been requesting my Total Files back from my x lawyers (see Attached letter dated September 14,2006 to the NB Lawyer Jamie Eddy:,Esq. ] now look at Law Society.{blog ] (2) I do not Know What Judge Russell"s Desision was Based on, and i do not think it was based on any REPORTS of APPRAISERS, Such as Babineau's Report, The Rules of Best Evidence. [ Now look at his Exter Bill of Babineau Invoice #05054id,Date 04/21/2005 and when I recived a copy from my now X lawyers in the mail on May 8 2005, =Description of exter invoice ,Discovery -Undertakings 1 day,meeting with lawyers,review Report,Court Date, Expenses:Travel,Charts,Hotels (2) Meals, H-Hst 15% for a Total of 4,835.75 Now look at the Lawyers bill to New Brunswick TAX PAYERS? =Summary of Bill of COSTS. Legal Services . Patterson Palmer -Truro Office=$153,828.69 Fredericton Office=$42,921.42 For a Total outstanding bill of costs =$212,359.86 Now look at the McLeod court case Bill of Cost =$333,333.01 And who was the stage player in this Court Case,??????? I can't tell you any more now ,? because i got to go to Work at the new dead end job of the Government Propaganda Systens.of Deep pocketing Tacit,???? (2 ) I was advisised in early 2001 by LAWYER BOB that in order to take or start a ACTION against Mr. Goodwin ,that I would need an Appraisal Report used in the Expropriation case , (The file # F/C/328/oo ) this is one reason I Retained the Number two Appraiser Mr.Babineau [see attached faxed correspondence dated April 3,2001 ? whitch should have been in Mr. Babineau's file or notes ,and was not.] ?? Build lots worth 16, to 25,000.dollars each. (3). also is Attached is page 90 from the Goodwin's draft report.The third or forth paragraph down ,now EXPLAINS TO ME how this an independent appraiser would know what is being faxed by a Governments worker Ross Little .? ! I confirm I had no Knowledge of any of this until August,2001,two weeks before Discovery of September 11th and 12 th 2001. so, how did Mr.Goodwin of these incidents which were occurring at D.O.T. in 1999.????? On or About February 13.1997 ,I went to N.B. D.o.T.planning office with a drawing thatI received from the Development Officer ,Lonnie Forbes, a drawing dated 12/96 . I drew a red line on it indicated where DOT could have saved the salt and sand storage buildings, by taking all of total Property of mine,by doing this.? now if Mr. Forbes had Plan # 82 ? that Mr. Goodwin was aware of; he did not provide it to me. He did not even provide it with his letter to me dated February 5 ,1997 ,?Which was received in mail on or about February 13, 1997, now this was after Steven LeBlanc meeting with Marilyn Harris and Richard Harris on February 12,1997,[look at Discovery 2001 Exhibit 21, and then take a look at Heather Pugh nemo and what she seed in Court,?? Now look at Mr.Justice David H. Russell ,June 3,/05 Decision on paragraph [51] quote, I accept Ms.Pugh's Evidence as being factual. I conclude Mr Harris did meet with Heather Pugh on the date mentioned in the memo ,. now think about this my wife Marilyn did not get of work till 4.30 pm,on the December 17/96 and the :only Public Meeting of December 11;1996 that people did not know about,the drawing with a date of 12/96 .the one that Lonnie Forbes,sent me. Now look at Sheldon Lee letter of May,28/1997 that i will not know about tile September 2001 , this lead me,QUOTE I do not belive this plan # 82 was not even prepared until March ,1997 because the Road center line as indicated on plan #82 must have come of a another survey sketch and the survey work.? so why would they have the survey work done befour December 17,1996. (4) My appraiser ,Mr. Babineau ,used Chapter 14 of the Expropriation Act,(section 45,) where a Business is located on the land Exproprrated ,DISTURBANCE DAMAGE ,include DAMAGES .....(FACT Land that would make 18 lots in one located,) see Attached letter from Whitehead Bird & Miles Dated October 6,1997, to DOT. This letter was forwarded with out my Knowledge,? I had by this date. Already sold my Gravel pit ,.and the Land had no FUTURE development potential for me, Allen Miles Esq, was the Lawyer who arranged for the sale of my Gravel Pit. ??
# posted by Richard A. Harris @ 9:55 PM 0 comments
1 comment:
a
What Rights do I have,To move on with Life After June 3 2005
OF THE NEW BRUNSWICK HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION DAY ON January 24 the ELIMINATION OF THE NEW BRUNSWICK HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION DAY ON JANUARY 24TH!!!http://oldmaison.blogspot.com/ the fact is that I can"t move a way from New Brunswick unless I give up on these law suit RE:F/C/187/o4, The Court Of Appeal of NB. Re::File 100/05 ; Look at Letter of September 28/06 , Received and filed on September 29/2006 "Delivered by hand ATTENTION: MICHAEL BRAY,Q.C REGISTRAR. Sir, I am not a lawyer and do not Know what a status Report (form 62,J ) IS,however ,these are the facts of my CASE to the best of my ability:-(1)
(1) I have been requesting my Total Files back from my x lawyers (see Attached letter dated September 14,2006 to the NB Lawyer Jamie Eddy:,Esq. ] now look at Law Society.{blog ] (2) I do not Know What Judge Russell"s Desision was Based on, and i do not think it was based on any REPORTS of APPRAISERS, Such as Babineau's Report, The Rules of Best Evidence. [ Now look at his Exter Bill of Babineau Invoice #05054id,Date 04/21/2005 and when I recived a copy from my now X lawyers in the mail on May 8 2005, =Description of exter invoice ,Discovery -Undertakings 1 day,meeting with lawyers,review Report,Court Date, Expenses:Travel,Charts,Hotels (2) Meals, H-Hst 15% for a Total of 4,835.75 Now look at the Lawyers bill to New Brunswick TAX PAYERS? =Summary of Bill of COSTS. Legal Services . Patterson Palmer -Truro Office=$153,828.69 Fredericton Office=$42,921.42 For a Total outstanding bill of costs =$212,359.86 Now look at the McLeod court case Bill of Cost =$333,333.01 And who was the stage player in this Court Case,??????? I can't tell you any more now ,? because i got to go to Work at the new dead end job of the Government Propaganda Systens.of Deep pocketing Tacit,???? (2 ) I was advisised in early 2001 by LAWYER BOB that in order to take or start a ACTION against Mr. Goodwin ,that I would need an Appraisal Report used in the Expropriation case , (The file # F/C/328/oo ) this is one reason I Retained the Number two Appraiser Mr.Babineau [see attached faxed correspondence dated April 3,2001 ? whitch should have been in Mr. Babineau's file or notes ,and was not.] ?? Build lots worth 16, to 25,000.dollars each. (3). also is Attached is page 90 from the Goodwin's draft report.The third or forth paragraph down ,now EXPLAINS TO ME how this an independent appraiser would know what is being faxed by a Governments worker Ross Little .? ! I confirm I had no Knowledge of any of this until August,2001,two weeks before Discovery of September 11th and 12 th 2001. so, how did Mr.Goodwin of these incidents which were occurring at D.O.T. in 1999.????? On or About February 13.1997 ,I went to N.B. D.o.T.planning office with a drawing thatI received from the Development Officer ,Lonnie Forbes, a drawing dated 12/96 . I drew a red line on it indicated where DOT could have saved the salt and sand storage buildings, by taking all of total Property of mine,by doing this.? now if Mr. Forbes had Plan # 82 ? that Mr. Goodwin was aware of; he did not provide it to me. He did not even provide it with his letter to me dated February 5 ,1997 ,?Which was received in mail on or about February 13, 1997, now this was after Steven LeBlanc meeting with Marilyn Harris and Richard Harris on February 12,1997,[look at Discovery 2001 Exhibit 21, and then take a look at Heather Pugh nemo and what she seed in Court,?? Now look at Mr.Justice David H. Russell ,June 3,/05 Decision on paragraph [51] quote, I accept Ms.Pugh's Evidence as being factual. I conclude Mr Harris did meet with Heather Pugh on the date mentioned in the memo ,. now think about this my wife Marilyn did not get of work till 4.30 pm,on the December 17/96 and the :only Public Meeting of December 11;1996 that people did not know about,the drawing with a date of 12/96 .the one that Lonnie Forbes,sent me. Now look at Sheldon Lee letter of May,28/1997 that i will not know about tile September 2001 , this lead me,QUOTE I do not belive this plan # 82 was not even prepared until March ,1997 because the Road center line as indicated on plan #82 must have come of a another survey sketch and the survey work.? so why would they have the survey work done befour December 17,1996. (4) My appraiser ,Mr. Babineau ,used Chapter 14 of the Expropriation Act,(section 45,) where a Business is located on the land Exproprrated ,DISTURBANCE DAMAGE ,include DAMAGES .....(FACT Land that would make 18 lots in one located,) see Attached letter from Whitehead Bird & Miles Dated October 6,1997, to DOT. This letter was forwarded with out my Knowledge,? I had by this date. Already sold my Gravel pit ,.and the Land had no FUTURE development potential for me, Allen Miles Esq, was the Lawyer who arranged for the sale of my Gravel Pit. ??
# posted by Richard A. Harris @ 9:55 PM 0 comments
Post a Comment