Ok…I decided to spent close to two hours on this blog.
Why? In memory of the 44 Canadians who died in Afghanistan.
I don’t support the reason we’re in that country.
But I will support the families.
I pray that I’m dead wrong on this one but many soldiers in these pictures might not come back!
Also, you will notice that the cold was set in my camera. At first, I believe that my camera was history.
If you wish to really follow the story in the pictures? I would start at the bottom and work my way up.
Enjoy -
25 comments:
Not a great picture of that girl from Fred FM near the end Charles, you should have taken another-that's why people don't like having their picture taken.
Anybody notice that Jody Carr never wears blue anymore?
Nice, nice, nice photo essay Charles. Thanks for lending me a pic!
Thank you for supporting the families and for covering this story.
But could you please remove the picture of the kids as my picture and the one of my child are in it and I don't want them posted on the internet.
Plus you didn't ask to take my picture. I was there to show my support also but if I would have known that my picture would be taken without permition and posted on the internet, I would have never have gone. The newspapers and tv cameras did ask if they could use the pictures they were taking and I said yes. But I dont appreciate getting a phone call from a friend telling me that pictures of me and my child are posted on the internet.
So please remove the close up pictures of the crowd. Thank you, and you should really ask before taking pictures as people will stop going to events like this, I know from now on I am going to keep an eye out for you in public and I will not go to places were you are. Or maybe I will want to talk to you about your inapropriate behavior.
lol...I'm going to begin removing pictures from annonymous comments?
I wouldn't even know where it is?
I guess that you will have to see me in person and go at the libary for deletion! < Is that a word? >
Yes, the Irvings can take pictures but bloggers are not?
Yes beware! You never know when someone will call ya and said- Listen!!!! YOU JUST BEEN BLOGGED!!!!
The only picture that I could see was the one of a female Canadian < looks like a female? > holding a child in a crowd.
This is way too funny!!!!
The woman politely asked you to remove the photographs of her and her children. You didn't ask permission and instead of doing what she requested, you laugh at her? What is wrong with you? Do you honestly think she should spend her time to try to track you down in person to tell you again to remove the photographs? How could she trust you to not take more photographs of her and post them on your blog and then making fun of her again for asking a simnple thing? There are people around who have restraining orders against former spouses and for their own safety have to try to hide their children from things like the newspaper and television for fear that the spouse might be able to track them down. Do the right thing and ASK PERMISSION of people before taking photographs. Would you want to be the reason a child is abducted by a former spouse or a woman is found and beaten by her former spouse? Or do you think it's all a big joke?
Sigh....I wish some people would totally ignored this blog.
The annonymous I REPEAT ANNONYMOUS individual has no problem being on TV and the Irving's papers so I don't believe she fears for her safety?
As I said? See me in person and confront me.
I'm happy that I'm not just a nerd behind a computer. I can face any individual in person.
If the individual is so concern? Call the police and charge moi?
They're the same bunch who made the complaints at the Legislature but I will get those four people.
Cowards must never run the system behind close doors.
Enough said!!!!
You just don't get it. You seem to think that you should be able to do whatever you want and not care one bit about other people's opinions. That's amazingly conceited of you and disrespectful of others.
They're the same bunch who made the complaints at the Legislature but I will get those four people.
And what exactly do you mean by that? It certainly sounds like a physically violent threat. One of these days you will be charged with uttering threats and responding with "I didn't mean it that way." isn't going to work.
Holly cow you are very ignorant. She politely asked you to do something and you are still laughing at her and saying she is the one responsible for your banning of the legislature.
Charge you maybe she should.
Opps.....came out wrong! I came not a violent individual only when confronted?
That's the ADHD WAY!!!
All that hypertension ready to go.
What I meant by get them???? I will get their names and blog or sue them?
I believe blogging would be better?
There is a huge difference between someone having a 2 second clip on the television news or a glance in a photo in the newspaper and having a photo on a blog site that is online 24 hours a day for years via archives and caching. You can't see the difference?
As for you pondering suing the supposed four employees who complained about you, I hate to break it to you but you would lose that case. Those individuals have the right to their own feelings and if they felt they were intimidated and annoyed by you while they tried to do their jobs, that's their right to feel that way. All a person has to do is read this blog and it's very easy to understand the viewpoint of those people. If I was in an office where you were constantly coming in waving your camera in people's faces without permission and being a disturbance, I'd complain too. Plus, it would be four against one. If you someday post personal information on your blog about those individuals along with commentary about how you're "going to get them" then don't be surprised if you get charged and/or sued for it.
Hey coward??? < At least you use an username >
Question?
Do you stay on this blog 24 hours per day????
Come on Man??? Get a life!!!!!
Moi going into people's office with my camera????
That's a good one!!!
So? We know it's four employees???
If you only knew what I know about this issue. I told many people and they just shake their heads and say- WHAT???
I will not go public with this one.
Stay tuned!!!!
Please Mr. Leblanc remove those pictures of me and my child. I don't want to be part of this childish website. I don't have the means to sue you and I don't wish to cause trouble, but please respect my wishes.
And on another note this is just my second time on your website and seeing you write those things about me and laughing, that is just rude and immature.
This is getting ridiculous???
Making me look like the bad mean blogger here.
I'm going to be perfectly honest with ya.
I don't have a clue which pictures you're talking about?
Deleting all 100 pictures is totally out of the question.
From bottom down. Give the number of the pictures and I'll see what I can do?
Sigh......
The only person with a child is the one that drove you Charles. Keep in mind that you may want the person to email you privately because there's all kinds of people out there.
I've read a lot of newspapers and I thought the story was quite well done, I don't know what is 'childish' about it, the newspapers have as many typos almost.
Perhaps she didn't know you were a blogger when you took their picture, but that seems strange.
The pictures are the two with the red and white umbralla in it. I think it is 78 and 79 from the bottom.
Again thank you in advance for removing those pictures.
You are a mean blogger. Just read what you wrote just after she asked you the first time.
Plus from what I can read in your archives this is not the first time you do this.
Someone is playing games here....you mean those two itty bitty one in the picture?
Someone better take over this issue. There's lots of umbrella in this blog.
Save the picture and send it to me at
oldmaison@yahoo.com
And you idiots agitating readers can maybe back off????
Merci!!!
I even posted every comments in this blog. I don't even know why I control them.
Ok send me the pictures that I truly know what's going on here.
Send me a private email with the pics.
Merci!!!!
Charles was pretty friendly, I don't get the animosity. I'm sure Charles will remove the pictures-if he can figure out how. With almost a hundred pictures I doubt he's going to be malicious here, those pictures don't add that much. This was a public event, and media was also there taking pictures, even video. He was pretty friendly here.
it's just a photo, people
Dude, I can see from the list of pictures which one she means. Just remove them and respect her wish. I know it sounds stupid that all this fuss for just a few pictures but its her wish and she asked politely.
I assume its gone because I can't tell which it would be.
I still can't find the pictures.
Someone is just playing games......
From what I can see I think the person is talking about picture 78 and 79 starting from the bottom.
That is the only pictures that have a close up of women and kids with the white and red umbralla.
Hope this helps. And I agree that you should remove those pictures as she asked politely. Try taking those two pictures down as a gesture of good will
Way to go Charles you are a fine human being for not respecting the wish of a person who asked politely NOT!!!
Class act Charles you are a class act AGAIN NOT!!! Man you are childish and immature.
Someday someone will give you a taste of your own medacine.
Post a Comment