"He has not provided Canadians a single compelling reason why his government should be re-elected and he has utterly failed to answer three important questions,"
"Mr. Martin, where is the missing money? Mr. Martin, why do the scandals such as income trusts keep happening? Mr. Martin, how after two referendum defeats could you let separation get back onto the national agenda?" Harper asked.
"He's dodged these questions because the answers to these questions all point to the corruption of the Liberal party." ___________________________________
l:l0 You must be paid to write this kind of stuff. Yes do get your facts. I voted NDP the last time and was leaning towards Conservatives this time but after reading this, I am voting Liberal. Final decision.
ATTENTION: atleast four of the above posts are by the same LOOSER trying to create one HUGE impossable illusion that the liberals have more then one supporter lol!. pretty LAME to say the least. ___________________________________ @4:06pm-
A:anywhere from 40-60 MILLION still unaccounted for,tho you are a liberal so you should know where it is right?
A:so there are not 'TWO' separate RCMP investagations of the liberal party underway right now? & o ya the RCMP just investagate air? ya ook LOL!
A:ummm yet again WRONG,its on the agenda because your leader wont shut up about it & his BEST BUDDY buzz hardgrove is telling quebecers to vote for the separtist!.
I wrote one of the above, so I'm not sure who the other 'loosers' are:) But by all means keep the posts coming, you do more to scare people away from the conservative party than all the speeches Harper has ever made.
Something to chomp on"
The beginning of the end The Conservative party has demonstrated from its origins in 2003 that it can't be trusted by David Orchard
On the international stage, Mr. Harper, his foreign-affairs critic, Stockwell Day, and his deputy leader, Peter MacKay, were vociferous in their support for the U.S. invasion of Iraq. While the vast majority of Canadians – French- and English-speaking – are grateful to former prime minister Jean Chretien for keeping Canada out, Mr. Harper, Mr. Day and Mr. MacKay would have had Canada participating in the illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq, and Canadian women and men would today be coming home from Iraq in body bags.
His past writings attacking bilingualism as "the God that failed," his advocacy of a firewall around Alberta, and his lack of passion for and roots in French Canada are lethal obstacles to such an effort in Quebec.
And what is the position of this new Conservative party on aboriginal people, another key part of Canadian society? One of Mr. Harper's principal advisers is a man named Thomas Flanagan, who came here from the United States and has made a career of attacking the rights of aboriginal people. His book, First Nations? Second Thoughts, sneers at the very the idea of treaty rights. The Canadian Alliance position was for privatization of the native reserves, which means the outright assimilation of aboriginal people and their cultures.
Agriculture is a major Canadian industry. The Canadian Wheat Board is the world's largest marketer of wheat and barley and, although almost unknown to Canadians, the most prestigious marketing board in the world. It is Canada's greatest net earner of foreign currency and one of the few remaining defences for western grain farmers. (Most recently, it played a key role in preventing the damaging release of genetically modified wheat in our country.) The new Conservatives have repeatedly stated their intention to dismantle and destroy the powers of the Canadian Wheat Board. Without the Wheat Board, our grain industry will move, virtually overnight, into U.S. hands and we will see even more farmers driven off the land.
Mr. Harper and his colleagues, although campaigning as friends of the farmer, revealed their true colours when they blocked an all-party investigation into the exorbitant profits made by the giant U.S. meat packers at the expense of Canadian farmers during the BSE crisis.
The new Conservative party has run a campaign focused on ethics. For months Mr. Harper and Mr. MacKay have been talking loudly and sanctimoniously about honesty, integrity and trustworthiness in our public figures and promising to "clean up" Ottawa. Well, the ethics of Mr. Harper and Mr. MacKay are, unfortunately, something I happen to know about.
In the last leadership race of the Progressive Conservative party, in 2003, Mr. MacKay and I went into the convention with the two largest blocks of delegates. At the end of the day, Mr. MacKay sought my support. We negotiated an agreement, put it in writing and signed it. Point number one of our agreement was no merger or joint candidates with the Canadian Alliance. I and the majority of my delegates then delivered our part of the bargain – we voted for Mr. MacKay and made him leader of the Progressive Conservative Party of Canada.
Afterwards, what did Peter MacKay do? Mr. Harper urged him to abandon his commitments to the membership of the PC Party and his agreement with me, and to merge the party into the Canadian Alliance. This the two men did – in a blatantly fraudulent manner. They arranged to stack the ratification vote of the PC party, whose members had steadfastly opposed merging with the Alliance – by allowing tens of thousands of Alliance members to join the PC party to overwhelm our existing membership and the voting process itself.
They then trumpeted a so-called 90-per-cent majority for the merger and destroyed the founding party of Canada, but not before stealing the party's colours, its reputation as a moderate centrist party, its history of achievement and half its name. These are the two men who would now lecture the rest of the political spectrum in Canada about ethics.
well you'll be glad to know that if 'LIBERAL' claims of hidden agendas on the part of stephn harper & all the rest of your fabrications are true 'in your mind' then go to this link of a REAL news website from IN canada to put your poor lil minds at ease about "ethics".
tho im sure you NEO-LEFTWING-LIBERALS will claim its a fake website owned by the conservatives or some FAKE SPIN on it. ___________________________________
-"Tories have best accountability platform: watchdog"-
-The 'Tories' had 'the best' overall grade of "B" -- mainly because they made many specific pledges in the areas of ethics and accountability, says Democracy Watch. -The Tories also had 'the best' grade in two of the five sections (a "B+" in "Open Government Measures, and a "B" in "Representative, Citizen-Driven Measures"). -The 'Liberals' scored an overall grade of "F" -- 'the worst' result 'by far' of 'all the parties', and they also had 'he worst' grades in 'all five' sections.
so 10pm if your worried about "ethics" then id vote 'CONSERVATIVE'.
OR
vote for "THE WORST" of "ALL THE PARTIES",that would be "THE LIBERALS" incase you cant read the 'FACTS' because you are blinded by 'FICTION'.
"platforms" mean nothing. The above are FACTS, a platform is just an advertising slogan a party uses to get into power. They can say whatever they want, and the day after the election rip the whole thing up and throw it out the window-remember the 'red book' the liberals had?
If you believe the promises of politicians I've got a bridge to sell you. I PROMISE I'll send you the receipt and its been documented by third party organizations that its the 'best promise' you'll get for this particular bridge! It's amazing how some people get older but stay as gullible as ever for the next generation of politicians-the corporations that run them must be so glad.
12 comments:
They are all ready for slumber party. At Duceppe's House? For unity sake.
GET OUT & VOTE ON MONDAY! :-)
UNANSWERED QUESTIONS FOR MR.MARTIN.-
CTV.ca
"He has not provided Canadians a single compelling reason why his government should be re-elected and he has utterly failed to answer three important questions,"
"Mr. Martin, where is the missing money? Mr. Martin, why do the scandals such as income trusts keep happening? Mr. Martin, how after two referendum defeats could you let separation get back onto the national agenda?" Harper asked.
"He's dodged these questions because the answers to these questions all point to the corruption of the Liberal party."
___________________________________
Please vote based on FACT not FICTION on monday.
TY. :-)
l:l0
You must be paid to write this kind of stuff. Yes do get your facts. I voted NDP the last time and was leaning towards Conservatives this time but after reading this, I am voting Liberal.
Final decision.
Good for you 1:10 - vote Liberal and be on the wrong side of the fence again. Good for You!
1:25 Good one. These Conservatives are really scaring people away. I was leaning Conservative. Not anymore. I think I will vote Liberal too.
Poor Harper tried to keep these guys under wrap but did not succeed.
Martin DID answer:
-missing money was returned by the liberal party
-income trust isn't a 'scandal' because nothing has even been alleged yet
-its on the national agenda because the bloc is a national party and that is they're central issue.
Do not forget those Conservatives who are in hiding right now. They are scarier than Harper. Once the muzzles are removed watch out.
ATTENTION: atleast four of the above posts are by the same LOOSER trying to create one HUGE impossable illusion that the liberals have more then one supporter lol!. pretty LAME to say the least.
___________________________________
@4:06pm-
A:anywhere from 40-60 MILLION still unaccounted for,tho you are a liberal so you should know where it is right?
A:so there are not 'TWO' separate RCMP investagations of the liberal party underway right now? & o ya the RCMP just investagate air? ya ook LOL!
A:ummm yet again WRONG,its on the agenda because your leader wont shut up about it & his BEST BUDDY buzz hardgrove is telling quebecers to vote for the separtist!.
TY. :-)
I wrote one of the above, so I'm not sure who the other 'loosers' are:) But by all means keep the posts coming, you do more to scare people away from the conservative party than all the speeches Harper has ever made.
Something to chomp on"
The beginning of the end
The Conservative party has demonstrated from its origins in 2003 that it can't be trusted
by David Orchard
On the international stage, Mr. Harper, his foreign-affairs critic, Stockwell Day, and his deputy leader, Peter MacKay, were vociferous in their support for the U.S. invasion of Iraq. While the vast majority of Canadians – French- and English-speaking – are grateful to former prime minister Jean Chretien for keeping Canada out, Mr. Harper, Mr. Day and Mr. MacKay would have had Canada participating in the illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq, and Canadian women and men would today be coming home from Iraq in body bags.
His past writings attacking bilingualism as "the God that failed," his advocacy of a firewall around Alberta, and his lack of passion for and roots in French Canada are lethal obstacles to such an effort in Quebec.
And what is the position of this new Conservative party on aboriginal people, another key part of Canadian society? One of Mr. Harper's principal advisers is a man named Thomas Flanagan, who came here from the United States and has made a career of attacking the rights of aboriginal people. His book, First Nations? Second Thoughts, sneers at the very the idea of treaty rights. The Canadian Alliance position was for privatization of the native reserves, which means the outright assimilation of aboriginal people and their cultures.
Agriculture is a major Canadian industry. The Canadian Wheat Board is the world's largest marketer of wheat and barley and, although almost unknown to Canadians, the most prestigious marketing board in the world. It is Canada's greatest net earner of foreign currency and one of the few remaining defences for western grain farmers. (Most recently, it played a key role in preventing the damaging release of genetically modified wheat in our country.) The new Conservatives have repeatedly stated their intention to dismantle and destroy the powers of the Canadian Wheat Board. Without the Wheat Board, our grain industry will move, virtually overnight, into U.S. hands and we will see even more farmers driven off the land.
Mr. Harper and his colleagues, although campaigning as friends of the farmer, revealed their true colours when they blocked an all-party investigation into the exorbitant profits made by the giant U.S. meat packers at the expense of Canadian farmers during the BSE crisis.
The new Conservative party has run a campaign focused on ethics. For months Mr. Harper and Mr. MacKay have been talking loudly and sanctimoniously about honesty, integrity and trustworthiness in our public figures and promising to "clean up" Ottawa. Well, the ethics of Mr. Harper and Mr. MacKay are, unfortunately, something I happen to know about.
In the last leadership race of the Progressive Conservative party, in 2003, Mr. MacKay and I went into the convention with the two largest blocks of delegates. At the end of the day, Mr. MacKay sought my support. We negotiated an agreement, put it in writing and signed it. Point number one of our agreement was no merger or joint candidates with the Canadian Alliance. I and the majority of my delegates then delivered our part of the bargain – we voted for Mr. MacKay and made him leader of the Progressive Conservative Party of Canada.
Afterwards, what did Peter MacKay do? Mr. Harper urged him to abandon his commitments to the membership of the PC Party and his agreement with me, and to merge the party into the Canadian Alliance. This the two men did – in a blatantly fraudulent manner. They arranged to stack the ratification vote of the PC party, whose members had steadfastly opposed merging with the Alliance – by allowing tens of thousands of Alliance members to join the PC party to overwhelm our existing membership and the voting process itself.
They then trumpeted a so-called 90-per-cent majority for the merger and destroyed the founding party of Canada, but not before stealing the party's colours, its reputation as a moderate centrist party, its history of achievement and half its name. These are the two men who would now lecture the rest of the political spectrum in Canada about ethics.
@10:00pm-
well you'll be glad to know that if 'LIBERAL' claims of hidden agendas on the part of stephn harper & all the rest of your fabrications are true 'in your mind' then go to this link of a REAL news website from IN canada to put your poor lil minds at ease about "ethics".
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20060117/elxn_democracy_watch_060117/20060118/
tho im sure you NEO-LEFTWING-LIBERALS will claim its a fake website owned by the conservatives or some FAKE SPIN on it.
___________________________________
-"Tories have best accountability platform: watchdog"-
-The 'Tories' had 'the best' overall grade of "B" -- mainly because they made many specific pledges in the areas of ethics and accountability, says Democracy Watch.
-The Tories also had 'the best' grade in two of the five sections (a "B+" in "Open Government Measures, and a "B" in "Representative, Citizen-Driven Measures").
-The 'Liberals' scored an overall grade of "F" -- 'the worst' result 'by far' of 'all the parties', and they also had 'he worst' grades in 'all five' sections.
so 10pm if your worried about "ethics" then id vote 'CONSERVATIVE'.
OR
vote for "THE WORST" of "ALL THE PARTIES",that would be "THE LIBERALS" incase you cant read the 'FACTS' because you are blinded by 'FICTION'.
TY. :-)
"platforms" mean nothing. The above are FACTS, a platform is just an advertising slogan a party uses to get into power. They can say whatever they want, and the day after the election rip the whole thing up and throw it out the window-remember the 'red book' the liberals had?
If you believe the promises of politicians I've got a bridge to sell you. I PROMISE I'll send you the receipt and its been documented by third party organizations that its the 'best promise' you'll get for this particular bridge! It's amazing how some people get older but stay as gullible as ever for the next generation of politicians-the corporations that run them must be so glad.
Post a Comment