Thursday, July 06, 2006

KELLY LAMROCK FINALLY COMES FACE TO FACE WITH CHARLES!!!


IMG_5547, originally uploaded by Oldmaison.

I had a very good chat with the Liberal MLA. Stay tune.....

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

So what happened??

Pretty soon all these bureaucrats and politicians won't even be able to go into shops downtown-they'll have to ban you from the city Charles! At this point it wouldn't even surprise me.

Anonymous said...

Be nice and non-antagonistic and who knows Kelly may help you.

Your abrasive and belligerent attitude is not paying dividends.

Anonymous said...

Yes, learn to suck up better Charles. Learn to grovel at their feet and worship them. Don't forget to call them "Honourable" or "Minister" even though they do nothing for New Brunswickers.

Anonymous said...

Mutual respect is very important no matter what the position of a person in life whether a person is a Minister or a pauper. Charlie Leblanc can be down right insulting and harassing. That is where the problem lies.

I have doubt of some of these ministers being so “honourable” and I am not a fan of politicians. But we all are human and due respect is essential. Charlie Leblanc thinks he is the only who has rights and he can walk all over others with impunity and that is wrong.

Blogger Charles LeBlanc said...

We had a good chat and I will not disclose our conversation but it was the very first time that I have been told the reasons I was banned for life from the Legislature.

Very interesting and very sad.

Let me put it this way?

If this was in court? I would quickly be found not guilty!!!!

Many many many false statements but stay tune because this is not over yet.

I will add that it was nice for Kelly to chat with me for 45 minutes. My God, he even played for the camera with me.

Stay tune...lots of action in the Capital.

Anonymous said...

Good Day Charles I am new to your blog, visiting it this week for the first time. I had heard about the ban in the local paper..(the Irving one) and was a little curious about what a person had to do to in fact be banned. If in fact you were not told the reasons then you had every right to complain and do so loudly. In fact you have put much time and effort in the past weeks on this blog complaining about how unfair you have been treated. The government, union leaders, opinion columnists, the papers, The Irving's and who knows how many more seem to be part of this conspiracy in your mind yet when you say you finally are told the reason you feel compelled to keep it secret. Is it because you feel the need to protect Mr. Lamrock? Is it for some legal reason? Perhaps you just didn't have the time to "go into it in depth"? Or perhaps there is a more personal reason? I cynical person might think that maybe the answer doesn't reflect too well on a certain blogger. Frankly after all the complaining could it be that knowing the reason is not as "convenient" as not knowing? Could it be that as the old Will puts it "Thou Doest Protest To Much"?

Blogger Charles LeBlanc said...

Nope..nothing to hide at all!!! As a matter of fact? I expect to be in the Legislature very soon.

All I will say is that Kelly couldn't believe the many lies that was said about me.

Stay tune....

Anonymous said...

If you are soon to return to those hallowed halls then is it not even more important that you let people know the injustice of your situation? If (from what your blog seems to indicate) you have spent so much time and effort looking for the answers to your banning it seem odd that when you finally find out why its such a secret, Especially as they are lies. It seems to me that your whole existence as a blogger is to expose those that lie and have no qualms expressing your opinions of them in no uncertain terms. Yet on this your unusually closed mouthed. I realize that its your blog and you can do as you please but I reiterate, your former righteous indignation at being banned doesn't seem to match the ease in which you pass off the "many lies" told about you.