I respect that Charles that lies or swearing are not allowed. Well I agree that proper language is needed at all times.
But as far as lies that people put in comments, can you prove that they are lies? I know for a fact, and yes I can prove it, that you wrote or posted other peoples blogs on issues that had lots of lies in it. I chose not to go into detail on this site because there is always a time and place for this and I feel this is not the place for it.
So you see sometimes people post lies (sometimes not knowing that they are lies or just got wrong information) and unless people come forward with proof that they are lies it is your word againts other peoples. So in my opinion if there is no swearing and you CAN NOT prove that they are lies you should post it.
Hey it would improve your credability if you would post it then comment back with facts and proof that you are right.
In reality there are simply too many nonsense postings to allow unrestricted access. Anybody that thinks a guy on welfare who has a blog and a multibillion dollar family who controls all the print media and many other media are 'the same' is just an idiot. In the past there was open access and the comments were full of swearing, slander and verbal abuse. Charles still posts most comments, even insulting ones to himself, so grow up and get a life.
Honestly I don't understand the fuss. The reality is so true. This paper has their own agenda and there is is alot of bias issues. Not going to waste my time explaining something some people refuse to see. If they want to support someone they do or an issue they want people to accept they give it a spin. A person could do great things but it is not covered because they don't want that facts known. They also try to give some people more political coverage if they like them.
You don't have to believe what is printed in this paper but some are so gullible they think it it is factual and all true, like the Enquiry.
8 comments:
You are doing the exact same when you don't post some comments.
Sorry...lies or swearing are not allowed in this blog.
Only facts!!!!
However, you can tell all kinds of lies and that is ok.
Do what you say? Post all comments and remove this approval crap.
I respect that Charles that lies or swearing are not allowed. Well I agree that proper language is needed at all times.
But as far as lies that people put in comments, can you prove that they are lies? I know for a fact, and yes I can prove it, that you wrote or posted other peoples blogs on issues that had lots of lies in it. I chose not to go into detail on this site because there is always a time and place for this and I feel this is not the place for it.
So you see sometimes people post lies (sometimes not knowing that they are lies or just got wrong information) and unless people come forward with proof that they are lies it is your word againts other peoples. So in my opinion if there is no swearing and you CAN NOT prove that they are lies you should post it.
Hey it would improve your credability if you would post it then comment back with facts and proof that you are right.
In reality there are simply too many nonsense postings to allow unrestricted access. Anybody that thinks a guy on welfare who has a blog and a multibillion dollar family who controls all the print media and many other media are 'the same' is just an idiot. In the past there was open access and the comments were full of swearing, slander and verbal abuse. Charles still posts most comments, even insulting ones to himself, so grow up and get a life.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/interactives/map-canada-media/
Grow up and get a life? Calling people idiots? That must be an example of a nonsense posting that slipped by.
Honestly I don't understand the fuss. The reality is so true. This paper has their own agenda and there is is alot of bias issues. Not going to waste my time explaining something some people refuse to see. If they want to support someone they do or an issue they want people to accept they give it a spin. A person could do great things but it is not covered because they don't want that facts known. They also try to give some people more political coverage if they like them.
You don't have to believe what is printed in this paper but some are so gullible they think it it is factual and all true, like the Enquiry.
Post a Comment