LNG Breaking News www.TimRileyLaw.com

Tim Riley wrote:

Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 09:16:04 -0700
From: "Tim Riley"
Subject: Warning: LNG Causes Pipeline Leaks
To: "From Tim Riley & Hayden Riley"

LNG Breaking News www.TimRileyLaw.com







July 13, 2005

LNG Causes Pipeline Leaks - Warning by LngDanger.com
Tim Riley and Hayden Riley, hosts of http://LngDanger.com, and producers of the LNG documentary film: The Risks and Danger of LNG, warn that a new report reveals - LNG causes pipe couplings to shrink and leak.



(PRWEB) July 13, 2005 -- The Washington Post reported on July 7, 2005, “A company-sponsored study, launched after a District Heights house exploded in late March, found that subtle molecular differences in the imported liquefied natural gas the utility began using in August 2003 were drying the rubber seals of aging metal couplings that link sections of pipe.” Prince George's County Executive Jack Johnson said, “he was ‘very alarmed’ that the gas industry knew since 1992 that changes in gas composition could cause couplings to leak.”



“We too, are very concerned that the energy industry knew of this problem, and yet the siting of new and expanded Liquefied Natural Gas importation facilities is moving at a fast-tracked pace,” said Hayden Riley.



“It is time to put the brakes on, and slow down the LNG application process - nationwide - until this troubling report and possible solution is fully examined and fully understood. We don’t want our communities being exposed to dangers of pipeline leaks and explosions from regasified LNG,” said Tim Riley.



The Washington Post further stated, “The frequency of leaks began to soar in late 2003, soon after the company started supplying Prince George's with imported gas, mainly from Trinidad, brought in by tanker through Dominion's Cove Point liquefied natural gas terminal in Calvert County.”



“We are very concerned that the leaks started within six months of the regasified LNG passing through the pipeline system. This shocking revelation proves that LNG’s allegedly innovated and modern technology has many flaws. What also upsets us is that apparently the industry knew about this danger, and nevertheless has failed to disclose this vital information during the nationwide LNG application siting process,” said Hayden Riley.



On July 9, 2005, The Washington Post reported, “The company attributes the leaks to the composition of imported gas, which it has said causes the rubber seals in underground pipe couplings to shrink. Officials hope that by mixing the gas with hexane and pentane -- heavy hydrocarbons lost during the liquefaction process -- or by blending it with domestic supplies, the additives will absorb into the seals, swelling and sealing the couplings.”



Hayden Riley added, “Naturally, the LNG company claims they complied with ‘current standards’ and therefore there is nothing wrong with the gas composition; and further claims there has to be something wrong with the gas company’s pipes. The gas company also claims they complied with ‘current standards.’ So we as bystanders, who face all the risk of their mistakes are relegated to watch their obnoxious finger-pointing game, and suffer injury on top of insult for their lack of responsibility. Clearly, proper standards, when it comes to regasified LNG are not known or high enough.”



“My cell-phone complies with FCC standards, and yet it drops calls all the time. I’m sure the LNG company and the gas company were both complying with ‘current standards.’ Unfortunately, the learning curve requires tragic accidents occur before we recognize when ‘current standards’ are outdated,” said Tim Riley. “California is now considering four LNG importation proposals. California’s pipeline ‘standards’ are as high and adequate as their wishful thinking permits, nevertheless their standard, at this point is purely speculative at best since California has no experience whatsoever in transmitting regasified LNG through a system which faces constant earthquake and seismic activity. LNG is too dangerous for Monday quarterbacking,” Riley added.



According to the Baltimore Sun on July 8, 2005, “‘The breakdown of seals in the couplings of gas pipelines led to about 1,400 gas leaks during the past two years, and has required the company to launch a $144 million project to replace lines and equipment,’ said Tim Sargeant, spokesman for the utility.”



"‘We are experiencing a significant increase in leaks in a 100-square-mile area of Prince George's County,’ Sargeant said. ‘We have not ruled out the possibility of a rate increase in the future,’ to pay for the extensive repairs, he said.”



Hayden Riley suggested that, “Those currently willing to risk residential neighborhoods exploding from regasified LNG leaks in hopes that they might save a few bucks a month on cheaper utility gas prices, now have to take a second look. The alleged price benefits of importing LNG apparently have costly hidden dangers as well.”



Tim Riley concluded, “Higher utility rates for replacement of couplings, pipe repairs and upgrading pipelines damaged by or to accommodate regasified LNG, will inevitably be passed on to consumers who will be forced to pay higher utility costs. Obviously this factor alone makes it clear that LNG will not bring down our utility costs, and to think otherwise is very naïve.”



Visit http://LngDanger.com and http://TimRileyLaw.com to learn more about Liquefied Natural Gas, and to preview and acquire a DVD copy of the LNG documentary film, The Risks and Danger of LNG which is an Official Selection of the Malibu Film Festival.




* Malibu Film Festival to Screen World Premiere of LNG Documentary Film 2004-09-17
* Anti-Terrorism Expert Praises New Film About LNG 2004-10-08
* LNG Film Now Available at LngDanger.com 2004-11-15
* LNG Tanker Liability is Limited by U.S. Law 2005-03-17



BHP Cabrillo Port Application Docket # USCG-2004-16877

The following Formal Comments were submitted by Tim and Hayden Riley and posted on the DOT Docket Management System



July 11, 2005



Comments Regarding the Draft EIS/EIR for the Cabrillo Port LNG Deepwater Port Application



Docket #: USCG 2004-16877

State Clearing House #: 2004021107



Submitted By:

Tim Riley and Hayden Riley

Co-Hosts of http://TimRileyLaw.com

Co-Hosts of http://LngDanger.com

Co-Producers of the LNG Documentary film: The Risks and Danger of LNG

Phone: 805-984-2350



We respectfully request that you consider and investigate the following vital issue in your review of the BHPB application:



According to ABC News, on July 8, 2005, “… Washington Gas concludes that LNG caused rubber seals within pipe couplings to shrink and leak.”



The Washington Post reported on July 7, 2005, that “A company-sponsored study, launched after a District Heights house exploded in late March, found that subtle molecular differences in the imported liquefied natural gas the utility began using in August 2003 were drying the rubber seals of aging metal couplings that link sections of pipe.” Prince George's County Executive Jack Johnson said, “he was ‘very alarmed’ that the gas industry knew since 1992 that changes in gas composition could cause couplings to leak.”



The Washington Post further stated, “The frequency of leaks began to soar in late 2003, soon after the company started supplying Prince George's with imported gas, mainly from Trinidad, brought in by tanker through Dominion's Cove Point liquefied natural gas terminal in Calvert County.”



On July 9, 2005, The Washington Post also reported, “The company attributes the leaks to the composition of imported gas, which it has said causes the rubber seals in underground pipe couplings to shrink. Officials hope that by mixing the gas with hexane and pentane -- heavy hydrocarbons lost during the liquefaction process -- or by blending it with domestic supplies, the additives will absorb into the seals, swelling and sealing the couplings.”



According to the Baltimore Sun on July 8, 2005, “The breakdown of seals in the couplings of gas pipelines led to about 1,400 gas leaks during the past two years, and has required the company to launch a $144 million project to replace lines and equipment, said Tim Sargeant, spokesman for the utility.”



"‘We are experiencing a significant increase in leaks in a 100-square-mile area of Prince George's County,’ Sargeant said. ‘We have not ruled out the possibility of a rate increase in the future,’ to pay for the extensive repairs, he said.”



We are very concerned that the leaks started within six months of the regasified LNG passing through the pipeline system. This shocking revelation proves that LNG’s allegedly innovated and modern technology has many flaws and other unforeseen problems, which will be even more difficult to discover when dealing with guinea pig projects such as BHP Billiton and Crystal Energy. Discovery of problems with guinea pig projects may unfortunately be too late and at too high a price - caution must dictate.



The possible solutions to LNG causing rubber seals within pipe couplings to shrink and leak now being proffered, such as adding more hydrocarbons into the regasified LNG before it enters the pipe grid have not been contemplated or addressed by the present applicant or its proposed regassification system.



Also the other potential solution proffered, such as blending the regasified LNG with domestic supplies can never be accomplished by the applicant for approximately 22 miles. Their regasified LNG won’t even reach domestic gas to mix with until it travels approximately 22 miles by pipeline.



Until this alarming study prepared by Environ International Corp., is fully examined and fully understood, it is time to fully stop the BHPB LNG application process. We don’t want our communities being exposed to dangers of pipeline leaks and explosions from regasified LNG, especially in the County of Ventura where the pipeline connections will be exposed to the additional stresses caused by the instability of seismic activity, liquefaction and earthquake as most recently predicted by the U.S. Geological Survey submitted with our last comment.



For those willing to risk neighborhoods exploding from regasified LNG leaks in hopes that they might get cheaper gas prices, now have to take a second look. The alleged price benefits of importing LNG apparently have hidden dangers as well. Higher utility rates for replacement of couplings, pipe repairs and upgrading pipelines damaged by or to accommodate regasified LNG, will inevitably be passed on to consumers who will be forced to pay higher utility costs. Obviously this factor alone makes it clear that LNG will not bring down our utility costs.



Respectfully Submitted by

Tim and Hayden Riley