HERMENEGILDE CHIASSON A ROYAL BIGOT???

I’m writing a few blogs today because I don’t believe that I will do too much on Monday!



Yes! Monday is a great day!

It’s a provincial holiday! It’s my birthday!!!

This is the reason years ago the Government made it a recognizes day!..lol…

I have debated the issue of the Lieutenant Governor Hermenegilde Chiasson on the issue of his comments that the Acadians should forget an apology and move on!

Many are not too please with his remark!

We know that Bernard Lord is born in Quebec so therefore he doesn’t have too much Acadian pride.


Myself, I always been touchy with this issue.

I remember when the C.O.R. Party with Brent Taylor announced that the Government should remove the Acadian flag from the Legislature. Also my bigot buddy Jimmy Webb said the same statement.





I crashed that meeting with over 800 members of the C.O.R. Part present to denounced their bigot views? It was just like a black person disrupting a meeting of the KKK!!!

I went further by asking then Governor Romeo LeBlanc face to face if the Queen will grant an apology to the Acadians?



I was certain this would have been done in 1994 during Le Congres Mondial! The Queen just happened to be in the area but it never happen! He told me that some person was working on it but it never happen!!!

The Government of Canada apologizes to the Japanese people of the way they were treated during the second world war.



So why not the Acadians?

Good question and I don’t pay attention to the media on this issue!

Tomorrow I will see the Lieutenant Governor face to face and asked him my questions?

Will his Royal Highness have me beheaded for speaking out on behalf of the many thousands of families who went through a lot of hardship so the Acadian population is very much alive today?

Am I doing something wrong?

The Lieutenant Governor should have kept his mouth shut!

He got appointed by who he knew and therefore shouldn’t have never gave his views on this very emotional issue!

Stay tune!

When I’m done with this appointed individual? I may spend my birthday in Jail???..lol….

Is Hermenegilde Chiasson a royal bigot????



I’ll let you know in my next update after I asked the guy some questions?

Will he ignore moi?? Stay tune!!!

A person has to love living in the Capital!!!!

THE ISSUE OF THE NATIVES IN CANADA!!!!

There's been a lot of comments on this issue so I decided to open my own blog on this touchy issue!






Anonymous said...
This letter in Gleaner may be of interest to Spinks. Dan Innis makes compelling case:

=======
Treaties didn't sign away all resources in Canada
I would like to offer comment on the recent Supreme Court of Canada decision on Indians and Crown land wood. For any Euro-Canadian court to pass fair, unbiased and just judgment on Canadian natural resources it must begin from the standpoint of the land that now is known as Canada is the homeland of the Beothuk, Maliseet, Haida, etc. It must also take into account that our homeland was acquired by Euro-Canadian sthrough genocide, deceit, religion and theft.

How many Canadians today would trust a treaty that is written in a strange language with no opportunity to acquire appropriate translation and are forced to sign that treaty under duress at the point of a gun?

Another thing which must be taken into consideration is the fact that those treaties between our people and the transplanted Europeans did not sign away any land or resources. They were simply treaties of peace and friendship. All that these latest rulings affirm is the Euro-Canadian arrogance and racist mind set of "white is right" and "might is right."

The reason Euro-Canadians are now pushing for so-called modern treaties is so all of the things (land and resources) that their forefathers neglected to include within the old treaties can now be included so as to make the theft of our homeland look legitimate and legal. For any self-respecting modern day Indian to fall for that bit of deception is dumber than how Euro-Canadians already think of us.

One final but crucial point. That being the Euro-Canadian concept of their rule of law. This rule of law is something that Euro-Canadians speak highly of in terms of the origins of civil government and society and at its heart is third party adjudication when disputes arise between two parties. Without third party adjudication the rule of law is a hoax and will be seen as a hoax.

Since the Euro-Canadian act of genocide was incomplete there are a few of us who are still here, and because the signed treaties did not sign away any of our land or resources. We still have the outstanding issue of jurisdiction.

All along the white man's law, under the rule of law principal, has said that because the Indians were here first, and are humans, until territory has been purchased from them by the newcomers that the Indians have territorial jurisdiction. As has been previously mentioned our homeland was never purchased by the newcomers.

Dan Ennis Tobique, N.B.

5:24 PM


Spinks said...
Mr. Ennis probably writes more letters to the edirot than any other native in N.B. He's considered a bit of a maverick even among his own people and I've never been clear on what it would take to make him happy. I suspect if 3 trillion dollars was offerede, he'd want 4 and so on. What's the price on injustices done in the past? I don't think anyone knows.

8:57 AM


Anonymous said...
You have serious problem in comprehending things other than your own blinkers and what you see. Mr. Innis makes lot of sense. You did not suffer genocide, natives did. So it is easy for you to say all that stuff and hold your narrow-minded views.

11:33 AM


vivenewbrunswick said...
I agree, that was kind of snide. That letter makes a lot of good points, the fact that the author writes many such letters is hardly a damning retort.

Native groups are similar to everyone else in that it is made up of individuals, so that he would be considered 'a maverick' by some isn't pertinent. No doubt I am considered a maverick by some, no doubt you are. Such a label has no real meaning and only serves to detract people from the real issue-which is the CONTENT of the message. If you can't comment or criticize the comment, everything else is just distraction.

This is a very real issue and must be dealt with openly. Natives have a fundamentally different way of viewing society, and they have valid reasons for attempting to recognize those rights. Our disservice is that we refuse to even discuss it. You'll notice that native representatives have never even asked for reparations, even though they would be perfectly justified in doing so. What they want now is commercial access to the land and self government. Continuous talking about the absurdity and amounts of 'reparations' just detracts from the REAL conversations that need to take place.

11:51 AM


Spinks said...
Interesting theory Vive, but lots of discussions over the years have taken place. What's a real discussion and again what's a real workable solution short of throwing exorbiant amounts of money which doesn't exist without taxing the population to the poorhouse.

12:30 PM


vivenewbrunswick said...
Find one quote from a native representative that asks for an amount of money that would 'send us to the poorhouse'. Find one. Somebody posted a post away back mentioning an absurd number, perhaps even being tongue in cheek. However, anonymous blogs at a blogsite is hardly representative.

So ask yourselves this: what negotiations have taken place? Where? What was said? What is the natives position? WHat have natives asked for?

I'll answer it for you, you have no idea. In fact, I'd do a poll right now and ask anybody who may still be reading this for the name of three native organizations in New Brunswick. Name them and who their representative is.

It's a good bet that hardly anybody knows because New Brunswickers have no idea what is going on. We almost had a ruling that would have let natives run to the woods and cut trees for commercial use. Obviously natives want that. Why do they need a ruling? Why CAN"T they do that? As New Brunswickers we own 50% of the land in NB, why can't half of that be set aside for natives to manage? This would actually be good because natives hire far more people per capita than Irving or the forestry companies do.

Native use would be closer to the management of private woodlot owners, where people take care of one certain section, rather than having Irving with it's not even 1500 cutters simply using technology (which our tax system lets them depreciate) to wipe out vast tracts.

Now, this is just me talking and thats just my opinion. I doubt that natives have even asked that much, even though as a voter and taxpayer I would GLADLY offer that deal.

So the question is, how many have asked their representatives what the government's position is? How many know what the native position is? From the above letter we can quite easily understand their point of view, but that has nothing to do with negotiations. The point of racism in Canada is that of course we ASSUME that government is doing it's job and playing by the rules, etc. The opposite is the case, and ignorance of that is no excuse. I'm not preaching here, I'm no different than anybody else, I don't know what their position is either, so I'm going to stop wasting time here and go find out.

3:12 PM


Spinks said...
Intriguing and you have a good point. I think part of the problem is there are so many different native organizations, MAAIW is one that comes to mind and they've never really spoken with once clear voice because of course there are hundreds of independent First Nations. Then you add in that if one group does sign a deal, people within the group buck it and want more on top of it. Big Hole Tract in 1995 on the Miramichi would be one example. It boils down to this, there's a whole bunch of different opinions out there among natives as to what they want and just like non-natives (the municipalities issue is probably the closest example I can think of) there doesn't seem to be that magic solution. That's part of the reason I raised the question, what's sufficient for the most people possible. Racism might play part of it but I suspect the bigger problem is a lack of understanding of what the solution is. I sure don't have it or I'd be a millionaire lawyer.

5:31 PM


Anonymous said...
How many cents lawyer are you then?

5:48 PM


vivenewbrunswick said...
Just because some people will try to skirt the law doesn't mean that's a reason to not negotiate. I read an article that talked about how the federal government is trying to dump native issues onto provinces. Even though we won't be making decisions, it's a good idea to know what's going on.

Native groups have chiefs(mayors) and councillors, just like municipalities. However, we have to remember that SOME reserves have huge problems with this because native culture has always been far more democratic so they don't always like the one group speaking and acting for them. There current form of government is one that has been forced on them.

However the bands themselves have various memberships just like your municipality does. This isn't confusing, your town council is a member of literally HUNDREDS of organizations. That doesn't mean it has any effect on the actual decisions that the council makes.

The so called 'warrior societies' are a different matter altogether. Usually if they get involved then something radically out of the ordinary is going on. When they are involved you have to be VERY careful where you get your information, because it's a good bet that editors have been at it.

12:39 AM


Anonymous said...
Before we get onto worrying about native demands we should keep in mind that our own government had a Royal Commission on Aboriginals which had a series of recommendations which are gathering dust on a shelf.

12:46 AM


Anonymous said...
That 12:46 AM post makes lot of sense. There is a lot of lip service but no action on the part of governments.

8:19 AM


Spinks said...
I've observed several different native negotiations for various things first hand and I just don't see a solution. I think you can satisfy some of the First Nations and then others will want more and then the first ones you settled with will want more again. It doesn't mean you stop trying but negotiations are just that, give and take. Given what I've observed there seems to be little room for give. It's usually all or nothing. Former NB Indians Assn. Chief Roger Augustine was an exception and saw how negotiation could move things forward and the First Nation he was Chief of - Eel Ground, is to this day one of the better off in N.B. I have tremendous respect for the man which is why I do get defensive when I'm called racist and hate natives because I simply have criticism or questions some people don't want asked. Although Vive, since you've added your name, you've been nothing but respectful.
St. Mary's First Nation has done some phenomenol work as well by creating business and jobs in the community. So many are grumbling instead and waiting for something to drop out of the sky such as the comments by Mr. Anonymous earlier about trillions and that every non-native should start paying rent and back-rent. I'm not familiar enough with First Nations outside of N.B. to offer comment.

1:31 PM


vivenewbrunswick said...
We'd really have to have more detail on that before we just buy into that bit about negotiations. You mean to say that you were a negotiator? Or that you simply followed it in the press?

Under federal law if one band receives a certain concession, then other bands are obligated to recieve the same concessions. No band I have heard of has ever asked for reparations, so we can simply drop that. The federal government has a clear history of breaking its own laws, there are tons of information on that on the web-even from government sources.

The propaganda in Canada is exactly supposed to be the above-you are SUPPOSED to think that it's all or nothing, that natives want so much and so our government has to 'be reasonable'. This is FAR from reality. In fact not even close.

There are of course different native tendencies, they want to 'manage' their own affairs. That doesn't mean they don't negotiate, or negotiate 'reasonably'. They have 5% of the cut, which is miniscule, even though they often hire non-natives. To suggest that if we offered 10% they would refuse and say "we want it all or nothing" is simply absurd. They would JUMP at it. It may not stop their court cases, but it would spur on negotiations.

2:03 PM


Spinks said...
No not a negotiator, an observer. There just never seemed to be much room for negotiation. That's why I can't agree with the propaganda comment. I am certain there are those who are willing to give and take, I've just never witnessed it and considering so little has been settled in hundreds of years, that would seem to be the way it's going. I have little doubt governments are to blame too and on certain issues aren't willing to move either, but it is a two way street. Both have to be willing to move significantly and I just haven't seen it. Again, I've been very impressed with native leaders who want to continue the negotiations but are also willing to create better lives for their people within the confines of what currently exists instead of waiting for whatever to take place. There are far too few of those leaders.

3:16 PM


Anonymous said...
I think that trillion of dollars thingy, Spinks, someone was just pulling your leg as you were making outlandish statements about natives and on the issue of racism. In final analysis we are all humans and there is a basic human goodness in all of us. It depends which part of the person you appeal, good or bad.

If certain issues were not solved for centures that does not mean that there is no solution. As was said before governments (Federal ,Provincial and to certain extent municipal) pay lot of lip service to buy time and push things under the rug. When there is sincerity on the part of governments there may be a backthrough. Also natives have to get their act together otherwise divide and conquer tactics of whiteman will continue.

3:37 PM


Spinks said...
I'm not sure what was outlandish but I'll chalk it up to point of view and that it's a sensitive issue so things can be perceived as such. I agree if First Nations want to make serious progress, unity is required with a common plan of goals and objectives. Can't say I agree with the the statement "divide and conquer tactics of whiteman", although you may not have meant it the way it sounds. I don't think every white person is looking for that although I'm sure a few are. I still think statements like that are racist because it's categorizing everyone the same because of their skin colour, it just happens to be white, but I know I'm alone on this thread about that one.
Sincereity would be a major step but given the current Minister Andy Scott's track record on say one thing and do another, I don't think it will happen with this minister.

4:15 PM


Anonymous said...
I said 'whiteman' on purpose to draw you out that how quickly you will react to that and how sensitivity works when it is directed at the person himself/herself. Yes it is wrong to generalize and I am glad you recognize that. If you met a few natives then you cannot generalize that particular encounter to the whole first nation - such as that they are racist or other attributes you assigned to them.

The "divide and conquer" have been tactics of those who are in power and those who control. In colonial times those tactics were used successfully and still that approach is being used by powerful nations of the world against weaker nations. I will go so far as to say that U.S is using those tactics in Iraq as those fellows are killing each other more so than fighting occupying forces.

'Divide and conquer' is reference to the government in control. I hope we are on the same wavelength now.

4:52 PM


Spinks said...
Sure. I'm really not offended and never have been by terms such as whitey. In fact you'd be hard pressed to find s white person who was. The point was that there is a double-standard on such terms. I don't think every native is racist, nor do I think every white person is racist, but racism is alive and well on First Nations just as much as it is in the north end of Saint Joh or anywhere else. In other words, two wrongs don't make a right.

5:01 PM


Anonymous said...
Here is another fact of life we must recognize. A dominant group in a society does not suffer from racism as much because minorities know if they push their luck too much there will swift consequences. Unfortunately opposite is not true. Here in Canada, natives and minorities (as word applies they are not dominant) suffer the brunt of racism. However, in the long run the whole society suffers. Dominant group has to set an example to have more livable and peaceful society. In Canada we have a long way to go to achieve that livability and peace. You will be wrong to say that natives are racist therefore we are equal. Not at all.

I will give you an example. Rich can ignore the poor for a long time but poor and hungry sooner or latter will break into the rich man’s house because they do not have food, TV or microwave and money. To say that let us ignore the problem because rich man has his own hardships to deal with and poor do not work hard and are lazy. That approach in the long run helps no one. There are many factors in play here. That is why governments have programs to get people in the job market and reduce the poverty. Hey you cannot eliminate the poverty completely but you cannot ignore it either. Same goes for racism.

6:04 PM


Spinks said...
Interesting point of view. Obviously I don't totally buy into it, because if a white person is racially attacked in say, China, he's the minority but let's be honest I don't think it would be reported as racially motivated even if it was. However you have sold me on the fact natives for example aren't really equal in many respects. I'm still of the view racism is unacceptable no matter who you are and to whom, and there is no excuse no matter what the people of one race have done to another but you've given me an understanding about why some natives may feel that way and feel justified.

7:04 PM


Anonymous said...
"...but you've given me an understanding about why some natives may feel that way and feel justified." That is very encouraging to hear. You have come long way my friend since your early posts.

Someone posted earlier that how well they were treated in China. I have never heard any racial attacks in China. The people, that I know, who have traveled to China have nothing but praises for Chinese society and its people. Now we are not talking about governments and its agencies we are talking about society in general.

Yes there are anti-American sentiments in China and elsewhere for totally different reasons. It has nothing to do with race. If you are an American and black or native and you are known to be American then there may be a problem. Race does not matter. My experience is that as soon as you show maple leaf and that you are Canadian people's attitude changes.

A dominant group has a responsibility to treat minorities well if we want a peaceful society or if we want to be known as a civilized society. We have more resources to do so then most nations in the world.

Natives have received short end of the stick for centuries. There is that built up anger.

Let me come at you from another perspective. Statistics show that crime rate is higher amongst poor than rich. You know why? Not that poor are criminal minded. Poor kids have suffered growing up and there is that built up anger. There is considerable literature in sociology which reveals that frustrated youth from poverty stricken environment retaliate against the society. As a society we have to understand that anger before we start laying the total blame on the poor. More understanding there is fewer problems there will be.

If you want to understand the world then travel the world if you have not done so already.

8:32 PM


Spinks said...
I hear what you're saying. I'm simply more of the mind that the individual still has a choice on which direction they want to take their lives. Lots of poor people have overcome the adversity and anger and made a difference in their lives and often in many others. Aboriginals the same thing. That's why I have so much respect for those who try and not as much for ones, who for lack of a better term simply "whine" about their lot in life. There was a great story on 60 minutes 15-20 years ago about a black woman in Chicago or N.Y. who worked with ghetto kids and told her students to stop wallowing in self-pity and make a difference in their own life. The when life gives you lemons make lemonade adage. 95% of her kids went on to college in an area where almost none did. That story always stuck with me as I went through a similar situtaion as a youngster (except for the black part, obviously). Tougher for poor, minorities, etc. no doubt but not impossible.
It's interesting this discussion started with my criticism of CBC for trying to create a story about a second attack on Chinese students. I stand by it when even the Chinese student interviewed told the reporter she had no way of knowing that particular attack was racism although the first one definately was. Too often stories are created and not reported on. I've witnessed native disputes drag out for days or weeks solely because of media manipulation (most often CBC was the culprit thus the target of my disgust). Anyway I digress and we have covered the gamut. You've given me a different point of view to ponder. I hope I've done the same for you.
Our critics are our friends;
they show us our faults."
-Benjamin Franklin

9:14 PM


Anonymous said...
Native: We are our own nation not part of yours, we want our own system of governance, we want our freedom.

Colonizer: You aren't being reasonable, here, we will give you access to some of the land under our guidelines, we will provide some investment and money to sustain and educate you.

Native: We are our own nation not part of yours, we want our own system of governance, we want our freedom.

Colonizer: You aren't being reasonable, we'll give you some more money, we'll let you handle your own books (sometimes), we'll give investment when you come up with a business plan.

Native: We are our own nation not part of yours, we want our own system of governance, we want our freedom.

Colonizer: You aren't being reasonable. Just because our supreme court SAID you could manage your own affairs doesn't mean you can. You might get irresponsible with the environment (unlike us) and damage it. We'll train some of you and get you some equipment.

Native: We are our own nation not part of yours, we want our own system of governance, we want our freedom.

Colonizer: Clearly you simply can't be reasonable, we are doing our best but we simply can't let you be 'free'.

Remember, at Burnt Church the natives came up with their OWN fisheries management program which was studied by Fisheries officials and recognized as being very sound. It was SENIOR fishery officials-who know NOTHING about fisheries who called in the police and made the whole issue unsustainable and resulted in the violence.

10:19 PM


vivenewbrunswick said...
There is some validity to a point earlier made, but as usual, some closer inspection shows that it really isn't an issue.

At the committee on wood supply, the following was stated by Pat Paul:
Whereas the Wulustuk Grand Council has never ceded any land and is the rightful owner of said territory, we hereby advise any person, community or corporation to not presume to buy, sell, cede, auction any land described heretofore.

Now, if this was reported in the media, one could well imagine that readers would think that the post above is correct. Clearly this quote seems 'unreasonable', and means that we can't do ANYTHING on the land.

First, we have to realize that the speaker was the leader for the 'traditional council', meaning that he is not part of official negotiations with the province. However, one could argue that he SHOULD be, as he is the 'traditional leader'.

So if we assume he speaks for many people, let's look closer at what he actually says. He says that no entity shall "buy, sell, cede or auction" any land. This is perfectly reasonable, since he is talking about discharging land, not the utilization of it. So really it is not such an 'unreasonable' claim.

To go further, we can skip what natives are saying altogether and look at what our own government said:
(d) There is a presumption in respect of the historical treaties that

• treaty nations intended to share the territory and jurisdiction and management over it, as opposed to ceding the territory, even where the text of an historical treaty makes reference to a blanket extinguishment of land rights; and

• treaty nations did not intend to give up their inherent right of governance by entering into a treaty relationship, and the act of treaty making is regarded as an affirmation rather than a denial of that right.

This is what the Royal Commission had to say, and current government policy is far, far different.

So let's look a little closer. Natives are allowed 5.3% of the allowable cut, therefore they have a significant interest. 92A of the 1982 Charter grants forestry power to the provinces, but clearly states that it is subject to Section 35 which guarantees treaty rights. The charter clearly stipulated that natives must be a PARTNER in forest planning, not merely another presenter to wood supply committees.

So we can also note that Stephen Ginnish, Chair of NAFA, states unequivocally that third party management of crown land is completely opposed by First Nations members. Now, we can also note that third party management is opposed by virtually EVERYBODY who presented-except for industry. We can also note that third party management is now the norm at the Department of Natural Resources.

So we see that when we discuss these things and find out the facts, there are very simple steps that can be done to 'bridge the gap' between natives and non natives. We can first note that a significant similarity exists between native and non-natives, and the only ones 'on the other side'- is industry and our own government.

12:32 AM


Anonymous said...
I see Spinks is still around with his misguided and misleading views. Sloganist style such as poor can pull themselves out of poverty. His examples are exceptions and not the rule. Some from poor can make it but not the majority. Do not blame the poor. The hurdles are simply too many and that is when society and government's role comes in. Take an enlightened approach.

Chinese students: All attacks on them were racially motivated. It is odd to assume that someone threw stuff and Chinese students happened to be in the way everytime.

CBC: the best news. The least biased media outlet compared to all others. Thank God we have CBC.

Natives: They were wronged for centuries and continue to be wronged.

9:59 AM


Spinks said...
5.3% of the allowable cut seems fair. The aboriginal population in NB is 1 to 1.5%, I believe although I stand to be corrected. Seems reasonable. We do have to all live together no matter what transgressions were made in the past. Probably an argument for a bit of a higher percentage given the high unemployment on First Nations but I wouldn't suspect much more.

11:47 AM


vivenewbrunswick said...
It isn't based on YOUR idea of fairness. In fact, that was the argument before, that since there are hardly any natives (once we killed them all off) then they shouldn't get ANY of the land, we'll simply hire some of them if they will work for it. The plan was to 'integrate' them into society and then all the land would be everybody's. That didn't work, thank god, and its never morally justified when trying forcibly integrate another culture.

So the colonial mindset is exemplified PERFECTLY above, because it ASSUMES that natives are the same as any other minority and their access should represent their demographics.

This is NOT an 'equal opportunity' debate. The above argument, even if it were reasonable, does not take into account future population growth and most importantly CONTROL. Natives do not WANT our forestry system, in fact a good percentage of european descent New Brunswickers don't want it either. That 5% does not include control, that merely means that we will let a certain amount of them work in the forestry industry. The allowable cut does not mean we 'set aside' a certain amount of acreage for them to manage-they dont' get the rights of private woodcutters who themselves have very strict rules in how they cut. The are simply 'brought into the machine'.

Human rights have NOTHING to do with demographics, look it up in the UN and canadian charter. The one with the whip ALWAYS assumes they are being fair, its when you try to walk a mile in their shoes that the colonial mindset finally departs. These are issues of justice and rights, not issues of governmental policy. I hate to sound derogatory, but essentially the definition of a narrow mind is one that only sees issues within certain parameters. Take the blinders off and actually LISTEN to some natives and you'll hear a whole different story.

12:39 PM

THE IRVINGS WILL CAUSE A REVOLUTION BY THE PEOPLE????

I received this private email last night!!! I always said that to become a Loyal Irving employee? You must dedicate your life and soul. Looks famillar???




Hi

I really agreed with the comments about Hilter and others like that who murder or hurt others can be nice people.

They also have several other sides that can be very disheartening and greedy.

People can't understand that good people do bad things all the time.

Please pay fair share of taxes and stop changing the laws for the rich and people in power.

People will some day take things into their own hands when they are desperate.

They have already started I'm sure.

People won't be able to pay for essentials and can't expect help from anyone so more violence will occur.

New Brunswick is beginning a whole new image which will be alot worse then anyone can image.

Nothing is being done now for people who need help.

But if we listen to our Mayor of Saint John, Premier, Ministers and some MLA's we are prospering and growing.

Yes deeper in dept and and all taxed out.

We thought we could retire in this province but the closer we get to that time, the more we wonder where we get our money.

Very concerned and uncertain of what will happen in the next ten years.

Sign...

?????

TWO DIFFERENT CITIES BUT TWO DIFFERENT COUNTRIES!!!!!

I found this old column that was suppose to be printed as a guest column in the Irving paper but was denied by the Irvings!!! Here's the column!!!


Two different Cities but two different Countries?



In the late 80s, I began to work at the shipyard in Saint John. It was 10 years of good money and a very high standard of living.


A few workers would take the bus to work and we would say - You take the bus??? With all that money you make???

I remember a few workers couldn’t understand the reason that some of our taxes would go towards the welfare system!

The good old days came to an abrupt end on July 19th, 1996.




The Shipyard closed its doors and many workers received a rude awakening. Carolyn McNaulty at Romeo House < Soup Kitchen > received many phone calls from many former shipyard workers in need of help.

It was a very difficult financial adjustment.

The days of going to the restaurants were over and months afterwards, many would instead go to the Soup Kitchen.

Saint John always had their share of poor citizens but after the closure of the Shipyard? The numbers grew.

On June 17, 2003, I began my six months tent protest in front of the Legislature and quickly learned there’s a big difference in attitude between the City of Saint John and Fredericton.

The Loyalist City has a Blue Collar attitude therefore more open minded than the Capital.



During my first evening, I heard someone shouting at an individual.

The reason? He was going through a garbage bin collecting empties.

Of course, in Saint John this would be a normal picture and no one will condemn the act.

On July 2nd, I decided to go to Officer’s Square and watch the morning sunrise.

While walking near a dumpster someone popped their head out like a Jack in the box. He had a cardboard box over his head.

He was collecting empty bottles from the celebration of the evening before. He said that he makes only makes $264.00 an month and that’s not enough to survive on.



He came by my tent and told me that he collected $92.00 in bottles and went home happy!

It’s called –Survival!

I would soon found out there was a Soup Kitchen located in the Western Part of the City.

Every evening, I would make my little walk to this needy place.

Once there, I notice that the volunteers were very friendly and George Pierse is really in charge of the going on around the Kitchen.

They served two meals a day and I might add you can eat all your stomach can take.

While in Saint John, The soup Kitchen would serve you one meal a day between 10:00am and 1:00pm! Even poor people do get hungry in the evenings.

I might add that the St-Andrew-St-David Church serves dinner once a month and the place is full of poor people. Many would ask for seconds to take home.



The summer of 2003, I read in the paper that former Mayor - Shirley McAlary announced that the opening of the Harbour Passage was a huge success because they gave away 500 to 800 hotdogs!



Excuse me? PEOPLE ARE HUNGRY!!!

Why do some poor families go hungry in one City while the other is full? That’s the emotional question?



I would soon find out the Shelter and the Soup Kitchen are the area of the less Fortunate. The poor souls can do their drugs or alcohol around the building.

No one will bother them as long they stay in that area!



Compare to Saint John this is a good idea. It’s their property and the Police won’t bother anyone.

I would soon find out that the Transit system is very bad in the Capital compare to Saint John.

I heard a sad story of a young woman who had an interview for a job but she couldn’t attend because she had to wait 3 hours for the next bus!

Of course, the attitude must be the same of my shipyard days?

They must say- You take the bus??? What’s wrong with you? Don’t you have any bureaucratic friends?

The bus system is much better in Saint John.

The Food bank in the Capital is located in a high class neighborhood.< never been
there >

In Saint John these helpful locations are located in the area of the poor population.

In the Capital, the homeless have no place to go so they can escape the cold winter winds.< except the shelters >



In Saint John, the Salvation Army has a place where these poor individual can have a coffee or play some pool!

Once a person is evicted from a mall? There’s not too many place a person can go.



The Salvation Army in Saint John would charge $7.50 a night for accommodation compare to the Capital who will take someone free of charge for a few
evenings.

In the Capital, if a person is down on their luck, They have to lower their pride and asked the Government for assistance.

They have open cubicles at the Family Services building where everyone can hear your personal business compare to Saint John were these private conversations are done in a private atmosphere!!

I could go on and on.

Yes! We do live in two different Cities and we have our different way of the matter the poor are too be treated but from the point I see it?

It sure looks like we’re living in two different countries!

THE IRVINGS FAMILY??? DON'T FOOL AROUND WITH THEM!!!

CHARLES'S PERSON OF THE WEEK!!!

Maybe you can help me on this one???? I don't know the name of our person of the week!!!! Strange!!!!





As I wrote in the past, I rode a ten speed bike across Canada and the United States! I know a beautiful site when I see one.

My person of the week goes out to the individual who came out with this wonderful idea! It used to be a train bridge but they changed it to a walking trail! Who's the genius who came out with this brainstorm??? Do you know? Please let me know?



During my protest, I would stand on the deck of the bridge and asked myself- How long am I going to stay in that tent. The Legislature is located in the background!



So this mysterious guy is my person of the week!!!

MARY KEITH < IRVING ROBOT > WAS AT THE NEWS CONFERENCE!!!

I was told that when Bernard Lord held his news conference on Point Lepreau.

Mary Keith < Irving robot > was there.

I guess the Irving media quickly surrounded their boss for her positive feedback on the issue of Point Lepreau!

I’m confuse!!! < not the first time > In today’s Irving papers!


The Irvings posted huge stories that the cranes at the Shipyard will be remove by September to make way for the Green Industry.

But they let it be known that the Irvings bureaucrats will work very hard in the Capital so they get the ok from the Lord Government.
Why would Mary Keith support Point Lepreau?

The Irving’s bureaucrats must be working real hard in the Capital so the Irvings will make Millions from Point Lapreau!

I feel really bad for the citizens of Saint John!

They have no news whatsoever in the Irving papers. All they read are good praising news from the Irving Empire!

It’s makes a people sick!

Of course, during the weekend these good Irving’s soldiers will praise the words of the Irving robot - Mary Keith!

Hey? If someone ever sees that woman smile? Please let me know…

No picture in this blog either. Sorry about that! Do you like the blog better with out the pictures?

LNG and now this???? Sure is a very good year for the Irving Empire!!!

Hey? They have the ok to spread their racists views in New Brunswick so who can stop them! Many one day someone will cross that thin line but it won't be moi!!!

Long live the evil Irving Empire!!!!!

NEW BRUNSWICK RACIST MEMBERS OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION SHOULD BE IN MUSEUM OF SHAME IN WINNIPEG!!!!

Here I am on a rainy Thursday evening with keyboard on my lap.

Boy? We need the rain. It might cool off a little. This little series on boarders or roomers rights really set me back on some issues.

Last week it was hot!!

Remember this blog at the end of May??????CharlesBlog


Well? I’m not complaining but I was in need of a fan and I got carried away a little.

I was in this bureaucrat office and I saw this fan turned off and unplug.

I was so desperate for a fan that I asked the bureaucrat if I could borrow the life saver?

My God? Asking bureaucrats for electrical fans now? If that person would have said ok? They could have lose their job???

What was I thinking?

I am cracking up!!!

Anyway, I was in an area and I notice this huge fan in a box!

I asked the guy- What is that fan doing in a box?

The guy told me that it didn’t work!

I bought the fan home and I fixed it in 5 minutes.

I seen the guy afterwards and asked- Do you wish me to kiss your hand? Feet or butt?

My God? That huge fan does the trick and I’m very grateful!

There's a big difference between living in Saint John and the Capital but I still love here!

Ok…A few weeks ago, I read in the National Post that there’s a museum for Human Rights in Canada.

You can visit the site at

target="_blank">CharlesBlog

It's located in Winnipeg and there’s also a section for the Human
Rights of Shame!

I guess the British are in there because of the Acadians being deported in 1755!

I know you know what’s coming and here it goes!

How come those racist members of the New Brunswick Human Rights Commission are not in there?

We have a commission who will turn against a person who makes a complaint that their rights are being violated!!!!

The complainant becomes the victim!!!

Only here in New Brunswick!!!

These racist Irving employees will escort the victim to the door!

In return, these racist members will call the Police for protection once they go out in public.

Their main goal is to put the poor in jail and this was proven when Susan Butterfield work in an undercover sting to set up this poor protester.

Look at the picture? Female officer Bragg against the wall and another Black guy were near ready to arrest me!

What other Human Rights Commission will allowed the Irvings to assault the minorities in this province?

I told this story on many occasions in front of many audiences but these bureaucrat or Irving bureaucrats stick together like glue!

When this first happen to me? I made a complaint to the Canadian Human Rights.

They sent me a letter telling me that they felt sorry for me!

But we have a convicted thief - Carl White who stole from the Irvings in the 80 and now is looking after their interest.

He’s the only Human Rights Case worker in the Southern part of the Province and the Irvings have him by the who know what!

I wish the Lord Government would announce an inquiry on those racists members but it won’t happen!

I also wish that Bernard Lord would call a quick election so he would be eliminated off the political map!

He should call a quick election as suggested by the Irving’s paper!

I pray that once the Election is on the way?

I hope the Irvings papers give their support to Bernard Lord because that will surely be the final nail on the coffin for the Premier.

The Liberals are going to be in power for a very long time because New Brunswickers will never forget the ignorance of Bernard Lord towards the issue of Ritalin, Methadone and VLT’S.

Lets not forget Coleson Cove with the Billion dollar deal!

I know one thing is for certain.

Once Shawn Graham is elected Premier?

These issues will be address!

The drugging and the killing of our children must be put to a stop!

Hey? I have been fighting with the P.C.’s ever since the first day Bernard got elected!

Before he got elected? He promised me that he would do a study on Ritalin but he lied!!!

I dedicated the last 6 years of my life on this issue but it’s worth it!

The battle will continue till the next election!

I see myself sitting down in front of the Heath and Education Committee and say- Thank God for Shawn Graham!

Bernard Lord will go down in history as the Premier who totally ignore the pleas of the Children in New Brunswick!

The issue of prescription drug use is a major problem in this Province but Bernard don’t care!!!!

POINT LEPREAU IS DEAD!!!!!

This is my prediction 14 hours before Bernard Lord news conference at 10:00am!

I didn't try to get some info but I will make a prediction.

I say that Point Lepreau will not be refurbished!!!

If they go ahead with it? It will be triple the price they say it will cost.

Bernard is going to go on a rampage against Paul Martin and I don't understand why? Could it be that he truly believes that he can be leader of the Federal Party one day?

What's your prediction?

THIS IS THE KIND OF GOOD NEWS I LOVE TO READ!!!!!!

Hi Charles, I find your site interesting…I can’t say I always agree with your opinions however freedom of speech is alive in Canada. Be careful with that character who is running your rooming house….sounds like he is not dealing with a full deck.



I just wanted to let you know that when my 18 year old was 6 years old the school system tried to pressure me into putting Adam on Ritalin. Adam has cerebral palsy and learning disabilities. He marked his early milestones later than most children:



Started walking without walkers and leg braces at 5 years of age
Only began to zipper and tie his clothing on his own in grade 4
Due to his hard work and fighting physical limitations began to ride a 2 –wheel bike at the beginning of grade 6.


Adam does not write, but prints, but despite all of this we REFUSED to put him on Ritalin as I was concerned about the long-term affects. I felt that this was nothing more than a babysitting tool for the teachers. They tried to guilt me by saying it would make life better for Adam.



Well, on June 27th, 2005 Adam graduated from Simonds High School. He graduated from the regular program (with the only modification in Math). Adam may not have been at the top of the class, neither was he at the bottom! He works and is well liked and respected by all. He thinks of others before himself and is caring and compassionate and we didn’t need Ritalin to get him to this point in his life!

Keep the fight...

sign

?????

BERNARD LORD TO SHORTEN OMBUSDMAN'S TERM????

NEW BRUNSWICK PROVINCIAL LIBERALS SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF THEMSELVES!!!

Yes, the Provincial Liberal Party should be ashamed of themselves!!

The information Highway is quite a tool.

It came a long way during the last 10 years.

I wanted to write a blog on the great Lou Murphy.

For you newcomers? Lou Murphy was the greatest politician Saint Johners has seen for a really long time!

Elsie Wayne don’t even come close to this great elected official.



I googled Lou Murphy name but couldn’t get any pictures.

By the way? It will be 10 years ago that he died on October 2st, 2005!



I visited his death bed a few days before he died! He was a great man! My final words were - You were a great man Lou! You helped a lot of people! Good bye!

Anyway, I asked the Liberal Party if they had a picture of Lou?

After a few weeks of bugging them?

I didn’t get any! There were no pictures to be found of the great Lou Murphy beside the pictures of every elected on the wall of the Legislature.

Finally, I made my way to the Library and asked the Liberian if they could help me?

The staff at the Library of the Legislature are very good to me!

They’re a fine group of professionals.

MLA’S come and go from the Legislature but these government workers are always there!

We walked in the back of the room and in the back of the file Cabinet were these pictures of the great Lou Murphy!

They were newspapers clippings of his death!

Finally, I could post his pictures in the information Highway!

Lou will be remembered for the rest of times beside Murphyville.




Pictures are from MurphyVille and this is Donny Coholan!!!

Donnie runs MurphyVille during the Christmas Holidays!



Great work Donny!!!

The reason the Liberals should be ashamed of themselves?

Once you go into their building? There should be a huge picture of the great Lou Murphy at the entrance.

It would be a good reminder to our future young elected Liberals of how they should act on behalf of the people!

Yes, Lou Murphy was a great man and I’m very honoured that I had the chance to meet this fine human being!



If Lou could see me writing this blog? He would be proud of me!!! Therefore the Liberals should do the same action!!!

PRESCRIPTION DRUG PROBLEM IN SAINT JOHN???? NOOOO!!!

I have been saying this for the last 5 years but no one listen to me anyway!!!



NB Telegraph-Journal | Saint John
As published on page B2 on July 27, 2005

Police cite prescription-drug abuse as robberies jump 54 per cent

BY DAVID SHIPLEY
Telegraph-Journal

Increasing abuse of prescription drugs is one of the major reasons behind a rise in robberies in the Saint John area, police say.


There was a 54 per cent increase in robberies in the Saint John area in 2004 compared to 2003, according to the latest information from the Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics, a branch of Statistics Canada.

In 2004 there were 63 robberies per 100,000 people, giving the Saint John area about 91 robberies for its population of 145,000. In 2003 there were 41 robberies per 100,000.

In 2004 there were about 91 robberies reported in the Saint John area.

With prescription painkiller abuse on the rise, addicts are turning to robbery for cash to pay for drugs such as Oxycontin and Dilaudid, said Acting Inspector Bill Hanley of the Saint John Police Force's Criminal Investigations Division.

'When people are in dire straits and are looking for fast cash to deal with their habit, then robbery is the way they usually go," said Acting Insp.. Hanley, adding that during break and enters criminals are not always sure what they will get.

"These are people that are addicted and in very, very rough shape," he said, adding that prescription drug abuse has begun to overshadow abuse of drugs such as crack cocaine.

To combat the rise in robberies resulting from drug addictions the police are talking with community groups to develop long-term solutions, he said.

The Saint John census metropolitan area is a 3,360-square kilometer land mass reaching from Lepreau and Petersville to St. Martins and Hampton Parish.

It includes Grand Bay-Westfield, Saint John, Rothesay, Quispamsis and Hampton.

Though robberies were on the rise in 2004, there was an overall decline in the crime rate and significant declines in break and enters and motor vehicle thefts.

Acting Insp.. Hanley said police were pleased with the overall decline in the area's crime rate, which was down 8.3 per cent in 2004.

Among the crimes on the decline last year were break and enters, down 15 per cent, and motor vehicle thefts, down 42 per cent.

Acting Insp.. Hanley credited the drop to a community policing initiative undertaken by patrol officers who went door to door advising citizens to call them if they see something suspicious going on at a neighbour's home rather than assuming everything is OK.

Officers also distributed information pamphlets advising people on how they can help reduce the number of break and enters.

The decrease in motor vehicles is the result of newer cars and trucks being equipped with vehicle anti-theft devices which prevent criminals from stealing them without first stealing the keys, Acting Insp.. Hanley said.

"I'm sure that's driving down that number."

HERMENEGILDE CHIASSON SAYS - THE QUEEN SHOULDN'T APOLOGIZES!!!

Herménégilde Chiasson,Lieutenant-Governor of New Brunswick says the Queen shouldn't apologize for the deportation of the Acadians in 1755!

I believe the Queen should say they are sorry for what they did to the Acadians!

What do you think??? I will asked the guy myself face to face when I see him???? Read this blog for more info?

BERNARD LORD KNOWS HOW TO RUN THE ECONOMY!!!!

ALIEN WARNS NEW BRUNSWICKERS! THEY DON'T WANT HIM!!!

WHY DO WE HAVE SO MANY AUTISTIC CHILDREN IN NEW BRUNSWICK????

This is a little buddy of mine that I took care of a few weeks ago. I bought him at the Soup Kitchen and he worked there for a while. I just wanted to give him an eye opener on the real world!

His brother is sadly Autistic.

I do understand only certain issues will be debated in great length in this blog!

But my question is this????

How come we have so many Autistic cases during the last 20 years in New Brunswick? What should be done with these kids? What would do the proper way to educate these poor souls???

FRED-FM TO DEBUT THURSDAY MORNING AT 5:30AM AT 92.3!!!!

On Thursday, July 28th at 6pm, Mayor Brad Woodside will flick the switch
officially launching "Fredericton's Classic Rock 92.3
Fred-Fm"...Fredericton's newest and hottest radio station.



From Thursday evening until the morning of Tuesday, August 3, Fred-Fm
will broadcast continuous Classic Rock music.

At 5:30 am, Tuesday, August 3, Fred-Fm will begin it's first day of
regular programming with the "Rudy and Mars" show. Listen at 5 minutes to the
hour and 25 minutes after the hour for Fred Headlines.

Holding down the fort middays from 9-2 will be Juanita...The Queen of
Classic Rock.

Tom Shock drives you home from 2 till 6pm. Catch your afternoon news
fix with Amal Newman and/or Joelle Worrell.

Farley entertains you evenings...6 till midnight.

For more information about us and how to get free stuff, check out our
website....

www.fredfm.ca

Thanks for listening and enjoy the tunes.

Dennis Melanson

BERNARD LORD SUPPORTERS ARE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PICTURE!!!

MOLLY'S IS THE PLACE TO BE!!!

Just for the record? No one paid me to write this little blog.



During my 6 months protest in front of the Legislature, I would always walk downtown especially at night.

The Capital is beautiful in the evenings. There’s no hills to walk up and it’s peaceful.

I would always walked by the many restaurants or stores on Queen Street.

I remembered one place in front of Officer’s Square call - Molly’s!!!

I walked in there on a few occasions but didn’t really noticed much until this morning.

I bumped into an old friend and we wanted to have a conversation in private so he suggested Molly’s?

I said- Sure! Why not???

I was in for a huge big surprise.

Once inside, it was pretty dark but the guy kept on walking through the building until he directed me in the back.

Once outside, I noticed a cool water fountain, nice chairs, garden and many huge umbrellas over the table so a person could escape the hot City sun.



I might add there’s good food such as Sandwiches and Soups. They always have specialties of the house. They also have any alcohol drinks you want. I might add that the coffee is fantastic. It's from another country!!!

The main reason that I decided to write about this place is the privacy a couple or anyone can have.



I remember one day, one politician wanted to chat with me but it was very difficult to have a conversation in private because all the restaurants are in the open and of course we could be distracted by other people.

In this case? It’s sort of a paradise centre on Queen Street.

A person doesn’t notice the place from the street!

It’s beautiful!!!!

I would suggest to anyone who wishes to have a meeting or chat in private over a couple of drinks?

Molly’s on Queen Street is the place to be!!!

My God! What a nice set up they have in that area.

Once again???? For the record?

Molly’s never paid me to write this blog about their fine place. They don’t even know that I’m writing this story!!!

I saw it with my own eyes and I was very impressed.

I believe that other citizens should have the right to know there’s a private paradise centre on Queen Street!!

Molly’s is located across from Officer's Square!!!

Molly's is the place to be!!!

By the way? If you go? Please let me know because I’m curious to know if I’m the only one who feels this way?

LORD GOVERNMENT- WE IGNORE THE POOR BECAUSE THEY WILL DIE FASTER! THEY WON'T BE A BURDEN!!!

This will be the final part on the issue of the rights or boarders and roomers in New Brunswick.

I forgot to mention one story.

When Tim Smith and I went to see the Rentalman Peter Kessels.


Peter first told us that I should go see a lawyer!!!

I quickly answered - Excuse me? When you live in a place like where I live? How the hell am I suppose to afford a lawyer?

Yesteerday, I made a stopover over the rentalman office.

The receptionist asked me what I wanted to see the head macho for?

Once I told her that I wanted to chat about roomers rights?

She quickly told me that wasn’t any concerns to this office.

Now? These are Government employees.

I could tell that she has already answered this kind of question in the past.

I did have a a 10 minutes meeting with Peter Kessels

I left the face to face meeting with a mixe message.

He did tell me that we do have rights and if I felt that I wasn’t treated right?

I should called the Police.



But he did say something that I found interesting or frightening.

He told me that they receive around 5 to 6 calls a week concerning boarders or roomers rights!

That’s scary!!! This tell me that there’s a lot of boarders and roomers being mentally or physically abuse around this province and there’s no where to turned to!

I point blank asked the guy - Where can these poor people turned to in case of a major problem like I’m having?

Tenants are denied the washrooms or other issues.

He told me that I should approached an advocate group and maybe lobbied the Government.

He reminded me that I should have numbers on my side.

I reminded the rentalman that once a person is poor? They lose all the energy to fight.

Which reminds me? I haven't heard from Family Services on this issue? I wonder why?

But I did learned that this Department is run by the Justice Department.

I am told that the Government could put in place someone to look into these issues but I’m certain that this will not happen because it’s Brad Green in charge of the Justice Department.

This guy is way off base once it comes to the poor.



I approached Bard Green last year about a case of a poor individual in his riding.

I gave him the phone number but he never called the person.

Let them eat cake is the memo of the Lord Government I guess but I will continue to educate the public on this issue.

The Lord Government will never pay attention to this act because I believe that I know the answer?

If a poor is on welfare and they live in a contaminated House?

They won’t complain because they are very fortunate to have a roof over their head.

Like my place? I guess there’s six people who died while living here so maybe the Government will not grant these people rights because they will die faster therefore saving them a lot of money in the long run.

Yes, New Brunswick is a third world country when it comes of the way the poor New Brunswickers are treated and the scary taught that they will not act!

They will let them die!



These people cannot afford a damage deposit so therefore they are force to stay in one place.

It’s just like a prison or an exacution chamber just waiting to die.

Myself, I always say - I’ll move next month and the month arrive and I say I will the next month!

That’s my darn ADHD in motion!

Always let things go by but it’s my faith that keeps me going and nothing else matters.

It’s not a bad place but to have a former homeless individual treat the tenants like they’re animals is not right!

I am very surprised that I haven’t lost my cool with this guy yet! I guess that my six months protest in front of the Legislature really helped me mentally because I don’t lose my temper as I used to and this is a very good thing!!!!

It’s a darn shame that we do not hear from the rest of the poor people in this province but then again?

They cannot afford the damage deposit never mind a computer.

I would love to see Bernard Lord living in these conditions for 24 hours!!!



Yes, Life is indeed an very sad sake of affair especially when you have a Government who doesn’t give a darn about the poor people in this Province!

God Bless them all!!!!